Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T09:02:00.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multicuspid tooth morphology in a gigantic Palaeocene pycnodont fish: evolutionary and palaeoecological significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2019

Romain Vullo Open the ORCID record for Romain Vullo [Opens in a new window] ,
Nathalie Bardet ,
Emmanuel Gheerbrant  and
Nour-Eddine Jalil
Romain Vullo*
Affiliation:
Univ Rennes, CNRS, Géosciences Rennes, UMR 6118, 35000 Rennes, France
Nathalie Bardet
Affiliation:
CR2P, UMR 7207, MNHN–CNRS–Sorbonne Université, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP38, 75005 Paris, France
Emmanuel Gheerbrant
Affiliation:
CR2P, UMR 7207, MNHN–CNRS–Sorbonne Université, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP38, 75005 Paris, France
Nour-Eddine Jalil
Affiliation:
CR2P, UMR 7207, MNHN–CNRS–Sorbonne Université, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP38, 75005 Paris, France BioDEcos, Department of Geology, FSSM–UCAM, BP2390, Marrakesh, Morocco
*
Author for correspondence: Romain Vullo, Email: romain.vullo@univ-rennes1.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A pycnodont premaxilla bearing a large incisiform tooth with an unusual crown morphology is described from the Palaeocene (Thanetian) phosphate deposits of Morocco. This peculiar tooth shows a broad, fan-shaped multicuspid crown with nine cusps, well adapted for benthic macroalgal scraping. This morph, assigned to a new species of Pycnodus (P. multicuspidatus sp. nov.), emphasizes the phenotypic plasticity of the group and documents an additional trophic specialization among Palaeogene pycnodontiform fishes. In the post-K/Pg boundary marine ecosystem of the Ouled Abdoun Basin, P. multicuspidatus sp. nov. may have opportunistically replaced Maastrichtian fish taxa with a similar front dentition and feeding behaviour, such as the putative specialized pycnodontiforms Stephanodus and Hadrodus.

Keywords

Actinopterygiipycnodontiformesdentitiontrophic specializationPalaeogeneMorocco

Information

Type
Rapid Communication
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 156 , Issue 9 , September 2019 , pp. 1618 - 1622
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

1. Introduction

Multicuspid teeth are known in various, distantly related groups of both extinct and living fishes and are generally indicative of algivorous/herbivorous diets (e.g. Gibson, Reference Gibson2015; Davis et al. Reference Davis, Unmack, Vari and Betancur2016). Despite a rich fossil record and a high ecomorphological diversity, no true multicuspid teeth have been clearly reported among pycnodont fishes, a widespread group known from the Upper Triassic to the Eocene. The anterior dentition of pycnodonts usually consists of monocuspid or slightly bifid prehensile teeth, very flattened and fully incisiform in derived taxa (Nursall, Reference Nursall, Arratia and Viohl1996; Poyato-Ariza & Wenz, Reference Poyato-Ariza and Wenz2002; Kriwet, Reference Kriwet2005; Poyato-Ariza, Reference Poyato-Ariza2005; Poyato-Ariza & Martín-Abad, Reference Poyato-Ariza and Martín-Abad2013). Nevertheless, Kriwet (Reference Kriwet2005: fig. 42e) figured dentary teeth of Nursallia with slightly incised crowns. In addition, the possible pycnodontiform genera Stephanodus and Hadrodus have large, broad incisiform teeth with, respectively, a denticulated occlusal edge (e.g. Zittel, Reference Zittel1888: fig. 310; Cappetta, Reference Cappetta1972: pl. 13, figs 1–3) and a bicuspid crown (e.g. Leidy, Reference Leidy1873: pl. 19, figs 17–20; Bell, Reference Bell1986: fig. 2.4–6).

The well-known Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) and Palaeogene (Danian–Ypresian) phosphate deposits of the Ouled Abdoun Basin (Morocco) have yielded abundant and diverse vertebrate remains, including many marine fish taxa (Arambourg, Reference Arambourg1952; Bardet et al. Reference Bardet, Gheerbrant, Noubhani, Cappetta, Jouve, Bourdon, Pereda Suberbiola, Jalil, Vincent, Houssaye, Solé, Elhoussaini Darif, Adnet, Rage, Lapparent de Broin, Sudre, Bouya, Amaghzaz and Meslouh2017). Among them, pycnodont fishes are well represented, with Phacodus and Eoserrasalmimus in the Maastrichtian, and Pycnodus and Serrasalmimus in the Palaeogene (Arambourg, Reference Arambourg1952; Kriwet, Reference Kriwet2005; Vullo et al. Reference Vullo, Cavin, Khalloufi, Amaghzaz, Bardet, Jalil, Jourani, Khaldoune and Gheerbrant2017). In addition, the enigmatic genera Stephanodus and Hadrodus are two other possible pycnodontiforms present in the Maastrichtian beds of the Ouled Abdoun Basin (Arambourg, Reference Arambourg1952, Reference Arambourg1964). We describe here two large pycnodontid premaxillae, each with one tooth preserved in situ, from the Thanetian of the Ouled Abdoun Basin. Both specimens show a similar incisor-like morphology; however, while the tooth crown of the first specimen (tentatively referred to Pycnodus cf. praecursor) shows a non-incised occlusal margin, the second specimen is characterized by a multicuspid crown and is assigned to a new species (Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov.). These two pycnodont specimens illustrate the evolutionary transition between a typical generalist form and a new, previously undescribed adaptive form. This discovery suggests that the regulatory pathways that govern tooth shape formation and lead to multicuspid teeth in teleostean fishes may also have been present in non-teleost actinopterygians such as pycnodontiforms.

2. Systematic palaeontology

Fig. 1.

Left premaxillae of Pycnodus cf. praecursor (MHNM.KHG229) (a–d) and P. multicuspidatus sp. nov. (holotype MHNM.KHG230) (e–h) from the Palaeocene of the Ouled Abdoun Basin, Morocco, in labial (a, e), lingual (b, f), mesial (c, g) and ventral (occlusal) (d, h) views. Abbreviations: ap – ascending process; blt – base of the (missing) lateral tooth; cs – cusps; of – olfactory fossa; tc – tooth crown; tn – tooth neck. Scale bar: 10 mm.

Material. MHNM.KHG229, a left premaxilla with one tooth preserved, housed at the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Marrakech (MHNM).

Locality and horizon. Sidi Daoui area, Ouled Abdoun Basin, Province of Khouribga, Morocco. Upper Phosphorite Bed IIa – base of the Intercalary Bed II/I interval, Thanetian (Palaeocene) in age (Kocsis et al. Reference Kocsis, Gheerbrant, Mouflih, Cappetta, Yans and Amaghzaz2014).

Description. MHNM.KHG229 is a nearly complete left premaxilla with one tooth preserved (mesial tooth). A second, lateral tooth, broken at its base, was originally present. The preserved tooth crown is wider than high (see Table 1 for measurements). It is spatulate, typically incisiform in shape, with a markedly convex and asymmetrical occlusal margin in labial view. The occlusal margin is continuous, i.e. not incised. The labial face is convex and shows a dozen slight sub-vertical folds. The lingual face is concave and bears three wear facets. There is a high, well-developed tooth neck. The thick, sub-vertical ascending premaxillary process is broken apically (dorsally). There is no fenestra, but a large mesiolingual olfactory fossa is present; this depression was forming part of the nasal capsule, together with the olfactory fossa of the mesethmoid.

Table 1.

Measurements of specimens MHNM.KHG229 and MHNM.KHG230

Remarks. Features of the premaxilla (i.e. two teeth originally present, elongated and almost vertical ascending process, large olfactory fossa for the nasal capsule) combined with the typical incisiform shape of the preserved tooth clearly indicate that MHNM.KHG229 belongs to Pycnodontidae (Poyato-Ariza & Wenz, Reference Poyato-Ariza and Wenz2002; Kriwet, Reference Kriwet2005). The well-developed olfactory fossa is similar in size, shape, and position to the pocket described in the premaxilla of Hadrodus marshi (Gregory, Reference Gregory1950: fig. 1a). By its size, MHNM.KHG229 might correspond to the premaxilla of Pycnodus praecursor, a large to gigantic nominal species from the Palaeocene of Africa (Angola, Niger) known only from isolated dentitions (Dartevelle & Casier, Reference Dartevelle and Casier1949; Cappetta, Reference Cappetta1972). MHNM.KHG229 is therefore tentatively referred to Pycnodus cf. praecursor. A large fragmentary prearticular dentition from Palaeocene of Togo, described as Pycnodus variabilis var. togoensis (Stromer, Reference Stromer1910: fig. 2), might correspond to the same taxon.

It is worth noting that the type species of Pycnodus (i.e. Pycnodus apodus from the early Eocene Bolca Lagerstätte, Italy), known from complete articulated specimens, is the only well-defined species of the genus (Poyato-Ariza & Wenz, Reference Poyato-Ariza and Wenz2002; Poyato-Ariza, Reference Poyato-Ariza2013; Cawley et al. Reference Cawley, Marramà, Carnevale and Kriwet2018). Most of the numerous Palaeogene nominal species based on isolated dentitions and traditionally referred to the genus Pycnodus (e.g. Longbottom, Reference Longbottom1984; for a short review, see Cawley et al. Reference Cawley, Marramà, Carnevale and Kriwet2018) need confirmation of their generic placement (Poyato-Ariza, Reference Poyato-Ariza2013); however, a systematic revision of these tooth-based species is beyond the scope of this paper. Therefore, the two specimens described here are provisionally assigned to Pycnodus.

Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov.

(Fig. 1e–h)

Holotype and only known specimen. MHNM.KHG230, a fragmentary left premaxilla with one tooth preserved, housed at the MHNM.

Locality and horizon. Sidi Daoui area, Ouled Abdoun Basin, Province of Khouribga, Morocco. Upper Phosphorite Bed IIa – base of the Intercalary Bed II/I interval, Thanetian (Palaeocene) in age (Kocsis et al. Reference Kocsis, Gheerbrant, Mouflih, Cappetta, Yans and Amaghzaz2014).

Diagnosis. Large to gigantic species of Pycnodus with incisiform premaxillary teeth characterized by a deeply incised, multicuspid crown (nine triangular cusps in the mesial tooth).

Description. MHNM.KHG230 is a fragmentary left premaxilla with one tooth preserved (mesial tooth). The lateral part of the bone (originally bearing a second, lateral tooth) is broken and worn. The labiolingually compressed, spatulate tooth crown is wider than high (see Table 1 for measurements). The crown is multicuspid, with seven well-defined cusps and a pair of poorly defined lateral cuspules. The cusps are triangular in shape and equally developed, albeit slightly decreasing in size laterally. The cuspidate occlusal margin is markedly convex in labial view. There is a well-developed, lingually inflated tooth neck. The mesiolingual olfactory fossa can be discerned along the thick, poorly preserved ascending premaxillary process. There is no fenestra.

Remarks. With the exception of the well-preserved tooth, MHNM.KHG230 is less complete and more abraded than MHNM.KHG229. Although MHNM.KHG230 clearly differs from MHNM.KHG229 by the multicuspidation of the preserved tooth crown, both specimens are similar in size and gross morphology (see Fig. 1; Table 1). Moreover, MHNM.KHG230 and MHNM.KHG229 share some characters (i.e. asymmetry and proportions of the crown, development of the tooth neck, thickness of the ascending premaxillary process, shape of the olfactory fossa; see Fig. 1), indicating that these two specimens belong to distinct but closely related pycnodontid species.

3. Discussion

3.a. Tooth shape development and evolution

Several studies have argued that only simple genetic changes were required for the rise of multicuspid teeth in the evolution of fishes (Streelman et al. Reference Streelman, Webb, Albertson and Kocher2003; Streelman & Albertson, Reference Streelman and Albertson2006; Jackman et al. Reference Jackman, Davies, Lyons, Stauder, Denton-Schneider, Jowdry, Aigler, Vogel and Stock2013). In their study on living African cichlids, Albertson et al. (Reference Albertson, Streelman and Kocher2003 a) found that interspecific differences in cusp number are determined by approximately one gene, suggesting that this character has the potential to respond to selection extremely quickly. A similar simple genetic basis of evolutionary novelty in the front dentition of pycnodontids can be assumed here, as suggested by the overall resemblance between specimens MHNM.KHG229 and MHNM.KHG230 as well as by the co-occurrence of the ancestral (MHNM.KHG229) and derived (MHNM.KHG230) morphotypes in the Thanetian strata of the Ouled Abdoun Basin. The peculiar tooth morphotype MHNM.KHG230 appears to be directly derived from the plesiomorphic monocuspid tooth morphotype MHNM.KHG229, and this may represent a case of punctuated equilibrium, with speciation between Pycnodus cf. praecursor and Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. by ‘budding cladogenesis’ (Wagner, Reference Wagner2000).

Whether multicuspid teeth have arisen during fish evolution either by concrescence, or by differentiation of tooth germs, is still debated (Trapani et al. Reference Trapani, Yamamoto and Stock2005; Jernvall & Thesleff, Reference Jernvall and Thesleff2012; Jackman et al. Reference Jackman, Davies, Lyons, Stauder, Denton-Schneider, Jowdry, Aigler, Vogel and Stock2013). However, this mainly concerns teleost taxa with numerous minute, closely spaced teeth (Trapani et al. Reference Trapani, Yamamoto and Stock2005; Jackman et al. Reference Jackman, Davies, Lyons, Stauder, Denton-Schneider, Jowdry, Aigler, Vogel and Stock2013). In the fossil record, the oldest evidence of similar increase in cusp number (from mono- or bicuspid to multicuspid small incisiform teeth) is known between two Late Triassic non-teleostean neopterygians, i.e. the dapediids Sargodon (Tintori, 1983, Reference Tintori1998) and Hemicalypterus (Gibson, Reference Gibson2015, Reference Gibson2016).

In pycnodontiform fishes, the number of premaxillary and dentary teeth never exceeds three and five, respectively (Poyato-Ariza & Wenz, Reference Poyato-Ariza and Wenz2002). In Pycnodus and other derived pycnodontids, these bones bear two monocuspid incisiform teeth (Nursall, Reference Nursall, Arratia and Viohl1996; Poyato-Ariza & Wenz, Reference Poyato-Ariza and Wenz2002), except Polazzodus, Sylvienodus and Tergestinia, which have a premaxilla bearing a single tooth (Capasso, Reference Capasso2000; Poyato-Ariza, Reference Poyato-Ariza2010, Reference Poyato-Ariza2013). Therefore, it is obvious that the nine-cusped tooth of Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. described here arose from complex folding of a single tooth germ (Differentiation Theory) rather than from early fusion of several tooth germs (Concrescence Theory). This interpretation is clearly supported by the equally sized premaxillary tooth MHNM.KHG229, which shows a similar overall morphology and differs only by its simple, non-incised crown contour (ancestral condition).

During the development of mammalian teeth, the folding of the enamel epithelium leading to the formation of multicuspid crowns is regulated by signalling centres called secondary enamel knots (Jernvall et al. Reference Jernvall, Kettunen, Karavanova, Martin and Thesleff1994; Vaatokari et al. Reference Vaatokari, Åberg, Jernvall, Keränen and Thesleff1996). The presence of enamel knot-like signalling centres controlling the cusp number in teleostean fishes has been suggested by several authors (Streelman et al. Reference Streelman, Webb, Albertson and Kocher2003; Fraser et al. Reference Fraser, Bloomquist and Streelman2008, Reference Fraser, Bloomquist and Streelman2013; Jernvall & Thesleff, Reference Jernvall and Thesleff2012; Atukorala & Franz-Odendaal, Reference Atukorala and Franz-Odendaal2014; Debiais-Thibaud et al. Reference Debiais-Thibaud, Chiori, Enault, Oulion, Germon, Martinand-Mari, Casane and Borday-Birraux2015). Recently, Smith et al. (Reference Smith, Johanson, Butts, Ericsson, Modrell, Tulenko, Davis and Fraser2015) showed that the development genes shh and bmp4 operating in the dentition of teleosts are similarly expressed in the dentition of the basal actinopterygian Polyodon, thus extending this conserved developmental pattern within the Actinopterygii. Therefore, the evolutionary transition observed between the monocuspid pycnodont tooth MHNM.KHG229 and the multicuspid pycnodont tooth MHNM.KHG230 may be explained by minor genetic changes leading to the formation of secondary enamel knot-like structures in the derived form, as for the difference in cusp number observed today between the adult teeth of two closely related species of cichlid fishes, i.e. Metriaclima zebra and Labeotropheus fuelleborni (Albertson et al. Reference Albertson, Streelman and Kocher2003 a,b; Streelman et al. Reference Streelman, Webb, Albertson and Kocher2003). The symmetrical formation of four lateral cusps on each side of the central cusp of MHNM.KHG230 could be compared with that of the tricuspid teeth of Labeotropheus fuelleborni, which is due to the uniform development of secondary enamel knots (and thus lateral cusps) on both the mesial and distal sides of the central cusp (Streelman et al. Reference Streelman, Webb, Albertson and Kocher2003).

3.b. Feeding habits and palaeoecological implications

The large size of MHNM.KHG230 contrasts with the diminutive size characterizing the multicuspid teeth of many modern fish taxa (Jernvall & Thesleff, Reference Jernvall and Thesleff2012). However, the dental morphology observed in MHNM.KHG230 is strikingly similar to that observed in modern algivorous/herbivorous forms, such the characids Hemigrammus, Hyphessobrycon and Phycocharax (Lima et al. Reference Lima, Wosiacki and Ramos2009; Ohara et al. Reference Ohara, Abrahão and Espíndola2017 a, b), the acanthurid Acanthurus nigrofuscus (Fishelson & Delarea, Reference Fishelson and Delarea2013), the sparid Crenidens (Fishelson et al. Reference Fishelson, Golani and Diamant2014), the terapontid Helotes (Davis et al. Reference Davis, Unmack, Vari and Betancur2016) and the cichlid Labeotropheus (Fraser et al. Reference Fraser, Bloomquist and Streelman2008). Interestingly, a similar tooth morphology is also found in various groups of herbivorous reptiles, such as pareiasaurs (e.g. Jalil & Janvier, Reference Jalil and Janvier2005; Tsuji, Reference Tsuji2013), ankylosaurian dinosaurs (Ősi et al. Reference Ősi, Prondvai, Mallon and Bodor2017), the extinct crocodyliform Simosuchus (Kley et al. Reference Kley, Sertich, Turner, Krause, O’Connor and Georgi2010) and the algae-eating Galápagos marine iguana Amblyrhynchus (Melstrom, Reference Melstrom2017). Among mammals, similar fan-shaped multicuspid incisors are present in an extinct macroscelidid tentatively referred to Miorhynchocyon gariepensis (Senut, Reference Senut2003) and in some hyracoids (De Blieux & Simons, Reference De Blieux and Simons2002).

Although the vomerine and prearticular dentitions of Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. still remain unknown and may have had a crushing function, all the aforementioned morphological similarities clearly indicate that at least one pycnodontine species has evolved an anterior dentition well suited for benthic macroalgal scraping. Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. was likely able to feed on the heavily calcified macroalga Halimeda, a chlorophyte abounding in the shallow marine ramp facies of the Palaeogene formations of the central High Atlas (Dragastan & Herbig, Reference Dragastan and Herbig2007).

The multicuspid incisiform teeth of Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. are rather similar to those of the front dentition of Stephanodus splendens and Hadrodus belinkoi, two putative pycnodontiform taxa occurring in the underlying Maastrichtian strata of the Ouled Abdoun Basin (Arambourg, Reference Arambourg1952, Reference Arambourg1964). However, the incisiform teeth of Stephanodus and Hadrodus can be easily distinguished from those of Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. The incisiform teeth of Stephanodus have a lower crown with a rectilinear or slightly concave occlusal margin showing numerous (up to 14), smaller cuspules (Zittel, Reference Zittel1888: fig. 310; White, Reference White1934: pl. 10, fig. 11; Tabaste, Reference Tabaste1963: pl. 13, fig. 3; Cappetta, Reference Cappetta1972: pl. 13, figs 1–3). The incisiform teeth of Hadrodus are usually bifid, with a crown showing two well-separated and well-developed cusps sometimes flanked by one or two additional cuspules in dentary teeth (Arambourg, Reference Arambourg1964; Bell, Reference Bell1986). In pycnodont fishes, premaxillary and dentary teeth may have distinct crown morphologies (e.g. Szabó et al. Reference Szabó, Gulyás and Ősi2016). As suggested by the dignathic heterodonty observed between premaxillary and dentary teeth of Hadrodus hewletti (Bell, Reference Bell1986: fig. 2.4–6), teeth of Hadrodus belinkoi and Stephanodus splendens may correspond, respectively, to premaxillary and dentary teeth of the same species (with large hook-shaped branchial teeth originally described under the name Ancistrodon libycus; Dames, Reference Dames1883; Arambourg, Reference Arambourg1952). A complete systematic revision of this group of putative pycnodonts is clearly needed but is beyond the scope of this paper; therefore, pending further investigation, Hadrodus belinkoi and Stephanodus splendens are considered here as two distinct taxa.

In the Palaeocene epicontinental seas of Morocco, Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. may have occupied, by opportunistic replacement, the trophic niche filled by Stephanodus and Hadrodus before the K/Pg boundary and vacated by the end-Cretaceous extinction of these two taxa (Fig. 2). This case of parallelism emphasizes the high morphological plasticity of pycnodont fishes and their ability to adapt to sudden palaeoenvironmental and palaeoecological changes (Poyato-Ariza, Reference Poyato-Ariza2005). Pycnodont fishes appear to have been trophically diverse in the Ouled Abdoun Basin ecosystem during the Palaeogene, with generalist, shell-crushing forms (Pycnodus spp., including P. cf. praecursor), a macroalgal scraper (Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov.) and a predatory, flesh-eating form (Serrasalmimus secans).

Fig. 2.

End-Cretaceous extinction of the macroalgal scrapers Stephanodus and Hadrodus (?Pycnodontiformes) followed by opportunistic refilling of vacated ecospace by the Palaeocene pycnodontid Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. Line drawings of Stephanodus and Hadrodus incisiform teeth after Tabaste (Reference Tabaste1963: pl. 13, fig. 3) and Arambourg (Reference Arambourg1964: fig. 1a), respectively. Not to scale.

Author ORCIDs

Romain Vullo, 0000-0002-1900-9991

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Patrick Catto for kindly donating the holotype of the new species described in this paper, and Damien Gendry for his help with the photographs of the specimens. Márton Szabó and an anonymous reviewer provided constructive comments that improved the manuscript. There are no sources of financial support.

References

Agassiz, L (1833) Tableau synoptique des familles, des genres et des espèces de l’ordre des Ganoïdes. In Recherches sur les Poissons Fossiles. 1st ‘Livraison’, Vol. 2, Part I, pp. 1–48. Neuchâtel: Petitpierre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertson, RC, Streelman, JT and Kocher, TD (2003a) Genetic basis of adaptive shape differences in the cichlid head. Journal of Heredity 94, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albertson, RC, Streelman, JT and Kocher, TD (2003b) Directional selection has shaped the oral jaws of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100, 5252–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arambourg, C (1952) Les vertébrés fossiles des gisements de phosphates (Maroc – Algérie – Tunisie). Service Géologique du Maroc, Notes et Mémoires 92, 1–372.Google Scholar
Arambourg, C (1964) Sur la présence d’un poisson du genre Hadrodus dans les phosphates maestrichtiens du Maroc: H. belinkoi nov. sp. Compte Rendu Sommaire des Séances de la Société Géologique de France 1964, 318–19.Google Scholar
Atukorala, ADS and Franz-Odendaal, TM (2014) Spatial and temporal events in tooth development of Astyanax mexicanus . Mechanisms of Development 134, 42–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bardet, N, Gheerbrant, E, Noubhani, A, Cappetta, H, Jouve, S, Bourdon, E, Pereda Suberbiola, X, Jalil, N-E, Vincent, P, Houssaye, A, Solé, F, Elhoussaini Darif, K, Adnet, S, Rage, J-C, Lapparent de Broin, FD, Sudre, J, Bouya, B, Amaghzaz, M and Meslouh, S (2017) Les vertébrés des phosphates crétacés–paléogènes (72,1–47,8 Ma) du Maroc. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France 180, 351–452.Google Scholar
Bell, GL (1986) A pycnodont fish from the Upper Cretaceous of Alabama. Journal of Paleontology 60, 1120–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, LS (1937) A classification of fish-like vertebrates. Bulletin de l’Académie des Sciences de l’URSS, Classe des Sciences Mathématiques et Naturelles (série biologique) 4, 1277–80.Google Scholar
Capasso, L (2000) Tergestinia sorbinii gen. nov., sp. nov., del Paleocene inferiore di Trebiciano, Trieste (Pisces, Pycnodontiformes). Atti del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Trieste 48, 261–89.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H (1972) Les poissons crétacés et tertiaires du Bassin des Iullemmeden (République du Niger). Palaeovertebrata 5, 179–251.Google Scholar
Cawley, JJ, Marramà, G, Carnevale, G and Kriwet, J (2018) A quantitative approach to determine the taxonomic identity and ontogeny of the pycnodontiform fish Pycnodus (Neopterygii, Actinopterygii) from the Eocene of Bolca Lagerstätte, Italy. PeerJ 6, e4809. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cope, ED (1887) Zittel’s Manual of Palaeontology. American Naturalist 21, 1014–19.Google Scholar
Dames, W (1883) Ueber Ancistrodon Debey. Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 4, 655–70.Google Scholar
Dartevelle, E and Casier, E (1949) Les poissons fossiles du Bas-Congo et des régions voisines (deuxième partie). Annales du Musée du Congo Belge A, série 3 2, 201–56.Google Scholar
Davis, AM, Unmack, PJ, Vari, RP and Betancur, RR (2016) Herbivory promotes dental disparification and macroevolutionary dynamics in grunters (Teleostei: Terapontidae), a freshwater adaptive radiation. American Naturalist 187, 320–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debiais-Thibaud, M, Chiori, R, Enault, S, Oulion, S, Germon, I, Martinand-Mari, C, Casane, D and Borday-Birraux, V (2015) Tooth and scale morphogenesis in shark: an alternative process to the mammalian enamel knot system. BMC Evolutionary Biology 15, 292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Blieux, DD and Simons, EL (2002) Cranial and dental anatomy of Antilohyrax pectidens: a Late Eocene hyracoid (Mammalia) from the Fayum, Egypt. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22, 122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragastan, ON and Herbig, H-G (2007) Halimeda (green siphonous algae) from the Paleogene of Morocco – taxonomy, phylogeny and paleoenvironment. Micropaleontology 53, 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishelson, L and Delarea, Y (2013) Comparison of the oral cavity architecture in surgeonfishes (Acanthuridae, Teleostei), with emphasis on the taste buds and jaw ‘retention plates’. Environmental Biology of Fishes 97, 173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishelson, L, Golani, D and Diamant, A (2014) SEM study of the oral cavity of members of the Kyphosidae and Girellidae (Pisces, Teleostei), with remarks on Crenidens (Sparidae), focusing on teeth and taste bud numbers and distribution. Zoology 117, 122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, GJ, Bloomquist, RF and Streelman, JT (2008) A periodic pattern generator for dental diversity. BMC Biology 6, 32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, GJ, Bloomquist, RF and Streelman, JT (2013) Common developmental pathways link tooth shape to regeneration. Developmental Biology 377, 399–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, SZ (2015) Evidence of a specialized feeding niche in a Late Triassic ray-finned fish: evolution of multidenticulate teeth and benthic scraping in †Hemicalypterus . Science of Nature 102, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, SZ (2016) Redescription and phylogenetic placement of †Hemicalypterus weiri Schaeffer, 1967 (Actinopterygii, Neopterygii) from the Triassic Chinle Formation, southwestern United States: new insights into morphology, ecological niche, and phylogeny. PLOS ONE 11, e0163657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, JT (1950) A large pycnodont from the Niobrara Chalk. Postilla 5, 1–10.Google Scholar
Jackman, WR, Davies, SH, Lyons, DB, Stauder, CK, Denton-Schneider, BR, Jowdry, A, Aigler, SR, Vogel, SA and Stock, DW (2013) Manipulation of Fgf and Bmp signaling in teleost fishes suggests potential pathways for the evolutionary origin of multicuspid teeth. Evolution & Development 15, 107–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jalil, N-E and Janvier, P (2005) Les pareiasaures (Amniota, Parareptilia) du Permien supérieur du Bassin d’Argana, Maroc. Geodiversitas 27, 35–132.Google Scholar
Jernvall, J, Kettunen, P, Karavanova, I, Martin, LB and Thesleff, I (1994) Evidence for the role of the enamel knot as a control center in mammalian tooth cusp formation: non-dividing cells express growth stimulating Fgf-4 gene. International Journal of Developmental Biology 38, 463–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Jernvall, J and Thesleff, I (2012) Tooth shape formation and tooth renewal: evolving with the same signals. Development 139, 3487–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kley, NJ, Sertich, JJW, Turner, AH, Krause, DW, O’Connor, PM and Georgi, JA (2010) Craniofacial morphology of Simosuchus clarki (Crocodyliformes: Notosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 10, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30, 13–98.Google Scholar
Kocsis, L, Gheerbrant, E, Mouflih, M, Cappetta, H, Yans, J and Amaghzaz, M (2014) Comprehensive stable isotope investigation of marine biogenic apatite from the late Cretaceous–early Eocene phosphate series of Morocco. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 394, 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriwet, J (2005) A comprehensive study of the skull and dentition of pycnodont fishes. Zitteliana A 45, 135–88.Google Scholar
Leidy, J (1873) Contributions to the extinct vertebrate fauna of the Western Territories. Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories 1, 14–358.Google Scholar
Lima, FCT, Wosiacki, WB and Ramos, CS (2009) Hemigrammus arua, a new species of characid (Characiformes: Characidae) from the lower Amazon, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 7, 153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longbottom, AE (1984) New Tertiary pycnodonts from the Tilemsi valley, Republic of Mali. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology Series 38, 1–26.Google Scholar
Melstrom, KM (2017) The relationship between diet and tooth complexity in living dentigerous saurian. Journal of Morphology 278, 500–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nursall, JR (1996) The phylogeny of pycnodont fishes. In Mesozoic Fishes – Systematics and Paleoecology (eds Arratia, G and Viohl, G), pp. 125–52. Munich: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
Ohara, WM, Abrahão, VP and Espíndola, VC (2017a) Hyphessobrycon platyodus (Teleostei: Characiformes), a new species from the Rio Madeira basin, Brazil, with comments on how multicuspid teeth relate to feeding habits in Characidae. Journal of Fish Biology 91, 835–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohara, WM, Mirande, JM and Lima, FCT (2017b) Phycocharax rasbora, a new genus and species of Brazilian tetra (Characiformes: Characidae) from Serra do Cachimbo, rio Tapajós basin. PLOS ONE 12, e0170648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ősi, A, Prondvai, E, Mallon, J and Bodor, ER (2017) Diversity and convergences in the evolution of feeding adaptations in ankylosaurs (Dinosauria: Ornithischia). Historical Biology 29, 539–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poyato-Ariza, FJ (2005) Pycnodont fishes: morphologic variation, ecomorphologic plasticity and a new interpretation of their evolutionary history. Bulletin of the Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History and Human History A 3, 169–84.Google Scholar
Poyato-Ariza, FJ (2010) Polazzodus, gen. nov., a new pycnodont fish from the Late Cretaceous of northeastern Italy. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30, 650–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poyato-Ariza, FJ (2013) Sylvienodus, a new replacement genus from the Cretaceous pycnodontiform fish ‘Pycnodus’ laveirensis . Comptes Rendus Palevol 12, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poyato-Ariza, FJ and Martín-Abad, H (2013) History of two lineages: comparative analysis of the fossil record in Amiiformes and Pycnodontiformes (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii). Spanish Journal of Palaeontology 28, 79–90.Google Scholar
Poyato-Ariza, FJ and Wenz, S (2002) A new insight into pycnodontiform fishes. Geodiversitas 24, 139–248.Google Scholar
Regan, CT (1923) The skeleton of Lepidosteus, with remarks on the origin and evolution of the lower neopterygian fishes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1923, 445–61.Google Scholar
Senut, B (2003) The Macroscelididae from the Miocene of the Orange River, Namibia. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Namibia 19, 119–41.Google Scholar
Smith, MM, Johanson, Z, Butts, T, Ericsson, R, Modrell, M, Tulenko, FJ, Davis, MC and Fraser, GJ (2015) Making teeth to order: conserved genes reveal an ancient molecular pattern in paddlefish (Actinopterygii). Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282, 20142700. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streelman, JT and Albertson, RC (2006) Evolution of novelty in the cichlid dentition. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Mol Dev Evol) 306B, 216–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streelman, JT, Webb, JF, Albertson, RC and Kocher, TD (2003) The cusp of evolution and development: a model of cichlid tooth shape diversity. Evolution & Development 5, 600–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stromer, E (1910) Reptilien- und Fischreste aus dem marinen Alttertiär von Südtogo (Westafrika). Monatsberichte der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 62, 478–507.Google Scholar
Szabó, M, Gulyás, P and Ősi, A (2016) Late Cretaceous (Santonian) pycnodontid (Actinopterygii, Pycnodontidae) remains from the freshwater deposits of the Csehbánya Formation (Iharkút, Bakony Mountains, Hungary). Annales de Paléontologie 102, 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabaste, N (1963) Etude de restes de poissons du Crétacé saharien. Mémoires de l’Institut Français d’Afrique Noire 68, 437–85.Google Scholar
Tintori, A (1983) Hypsisomatic Semionotidae (Pisces, Actinopterygii) from the Upper Triassic of Lombardy (N. Italy). Rivista Italiana de Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 88, 417–42.Google Scholar
Tintori, A (1998) Fish biodiversity in the marine Norian (Late Triassic) of northern Italy: the first neopterygian radiation. Italian Journal of Zoology 65, 193–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapani, J, Yamamoto, Y and Stock, DW (2005) Ontogenetic transition from unicuspid to multicuspid oral dentition in a teleost fish: Astyanax mexicanus, the Mexican tetra (Ostariophysi: Characidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 145, 523–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuji, LA (2013) Anatomy, cranial ontogeny and phylogenetic relationships of the pareiasaur Deltavjatia rossicus from the Late Permian of central Russia. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 104, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaatokari, A, Åberg, T, Jernvall, J, Keränen, S and Thesleff, I (1996) The enamel knot as a signaling center in the developing mouse tooth. Mechanisms of Development 54, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vullo, R, Cavin, L, Khalloufi, B, Amaghzaz, M, Bardet, N, Jalil, N-E, Jourani, E, Khaldoune, F and Gheerbrant, E (2017) A unique Cretaceous–Paleogene lineage of piranha-jawed pycnodont fishes. Scientific Reports 7, 6802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06792-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, PJ (2000) The quality of the fossil record and the accuracy of phylogenetic inferences about sampling and diversity. Systematic Biology 49, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, EI (1934) Fossil fishes of Sokoto Province. Geological Survey of Nigeria 14, 1–78.Google Scholar
Zittel, KA (1888) Handbuch der Palæontologie. I Abtheilung. Palæozoologie. III Band. Vertebrata (Pisces, Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves). Second Instalment. Munich and Leipzig: Druck und Verlag von R Oldenbourg, 257–436 pp.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Left premaxillae of Pycnodus cf. praecursor (MHNM.KHG229) (a–d) and P. multicuspidatus sp. nov. (holotype MHNM.KHG230) (e–h) from the Palaeocene of the Ouled Abdoun Basin, Morocco, in labial (a, e), lingual (b, f), mesial (c, g) and ventral (occlusal) (d, h) views. Abbreviations: ap – ascending process; blt – base of the (missing) lateral tooth; cs – cusps; of – olfactory fossa; tc – tooth crown; tn – tooth neck. Scale bar: 10 mm.

Figure 1

Table 1. Measurements of specimens MHNM.KHG229 and MHNM.KHG230

Figure 2

Fig. 2. End-Cretaceous extinction of the macroalgal scrapers Stephanodus and Hadrodus (?Pycnodontiformes) followed by opportunistic refilling of vacated ecospace by the Palaeocene pycnodontid Pycnodus multicuspidatus sp. nov. Line drawings of Stephanodus and Hadrodus incisiform teeth after Tabaste (1963: pl. 13, fig. 3) and Arambourg (1964: fig. 1a), respectively. Not to scale.