Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:19:37.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and temperature-dependent phase transitions of lead-free Bi1/2Na1/2TiO3–Bi1/2K1/2TiO3–K0.5Na0.5NbO3 piezoceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2012

Eva-Maria Anton*
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Ljubomira Ana Schmitt
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Geosciences, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Manuel Hinterstein
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffwissenschaft, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Joe Trodahl
Affiliation:
MacDiarmid Institute of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
Ben Kowalski
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Wook Jo
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Hans-Joachim Kleebe
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Geosciences, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Jürgen Rödel
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Jacob L. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: anton@ceramics.tu-darmstadt.de

Abstract

Structure and phase transitions of (1 − y)((1 − x)Bi1/2Na1/2TiO3–xBi1/2K1/2TiO3)–yK0.5Na0.5NbO3 (x; y) piezoceramics (0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.4; 0 ≤ y ≤ 0.05) were investigated by transmission electron microscopy, neutron diffraction, temperature-dependent x-ray diffraction, and Raman spectroscopy. The local crystallographic structure at room temperature (RT) does not change by adding K0.5Na0.5NbO3 to Bi1/2Na1/2TiO3–xBi1/2K1/2TiO3 for x = 0.2 and 0.4. The average crystal structure and microstructure on the other hand develop from mainly long-range polar order with ferroelectric domains to short-range order with polar nanoregions displaying a more pronounced relaxor character. The (0.1; 0) and (0.1; 0.02) compositions exhibit monoclinic Cc space group symmetry, which transform into Cc + P4bm at 185 and 130 °C, respectively. This high temperature phase is stable at RT for the morphotropic phase boundary compositions of (0.1; 0.05) and all compositions with x = 0.2. For the compositions of (0.1; 0) and (0.1; 0.02), local structural changes on heating are evidenced by Raman; for all other compositions, changes in the long-range average crystal structure were observed.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

FIG. 1. BF images of (a) BNT–0.2BKT, (b) (BNT–0.2BKT)–0.02KNN, (c) BNT–0.4BKT, and (d) (BNT–0.4BKT)–0.05KNN. The insets show enlarged grains of the respective composition. Scale bars are the same for all main figures and all insets, respectively.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. SAED pattern of the <310>c zone for (a) (0.2; 0) revealing strong ½{ooe} and weak ½{ooo} SSRs, (b) SAED pattern for the same (0.2; 0) composition also revealing both SSRs, but with inverse intensities. SAED patterns for (c) (0.2; 0.02) and (d) (0.2; 0.05) reveal strong ½{ooe} and weak ½{ooo} SSRs.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. SAED patterns of the <310>c zone for (a) (0.4; 0) revealing both ½{ooo} and ½{ooe} SSRs. In the SAED patterns for (b) (0.4; 0.02) and (c) (0.4; 0.05), only ½{ooe} SSR is observed.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Room temperature XRD patterns. (a) The entire 2θ range for (BNT–0.1BKT)–yKNN and (b) a selected 2θ range to magnify the ½{311}c and {111}c reflections. (c) A selected 2θ range for (BNT–0.2BKT)–yKNN to show the {111}c and {200}c reflections and (d) for (BNT–0.4BKT)–yKNN to enlarge the {200}c reflections.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. a) Room temperature neutron diffraction pattern and (b) phase fractions for (BNT–0.1BKT)–yKNN.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Biso of the A-site cations for (BNT–0.1BKT)–yKNN.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Room temperature Raman spectra for (a) (BNT–0.1BKT)–yKNN, (b) (BNT–0.2BKT)–yKNN, and (c) (BNT–0.4BKT)–yKNN.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Temperature-dependent evolution of the XRD reflections {110}c, {002}c, {111}c, and the SSR ½{311}c for (a) BNT–0.1BKT, (b) BNT–0.2BKT, and (c) BNT–0.4BKT.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Refined pseudocubic lattice constants for (a) BNT–0.1BKT, (b) BNT–0.2BKT, and (c) BNT–0.4BKT. The insets show the c/a ratio of the tetragonal phase.

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Temperature-dependent Raman spectra for (a) BNT–0.1BKT, (b) BNT–0.2BKT, and (c) BNT–0.4BKT.

Figure 10

FIG. 11. Frequencies of selected Raman modes as obtained by a fit with four Lorentzian lines. (a) BNT–0.1BKT, (b) BNT–0.2BKT, and (c) BNT–0.4BKT.

Figure 11

FIG. 12. Comparison of the phase transition temperature of BNT–0.1BKT and (BNT–0.1BKT)–0.02KNN as revealed by a discontinuous frequency shift of a Raman mode.

Figure 12

TABLE I. Summary of the structure and phase transitions (PT) of (BNT-xBKT)-yKNN from room temperature (RT) up to high temperatures (HT) of 500 °C. FE: ferroelectric domains, PNR: polar nanoregions.

Supplementary material: File

Anton Supplementary Material

Tables

Download Anton Supplementary Material(File)
File 724.5 KB