Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:50:35.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for sex differences in fetal programming of physiological stress reactivity in infancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2014

Florin Tibu
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Jonathan Hill*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Helen Sharp
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Kate Marshall
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Vivette Glover
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Andrew Pickles
Affiliation:
King's College London
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jonathan Hill, Centre for Developmental Science and Disorders, University of Manchester, Room 3.305, Third Floor, Jean McFarlane Building, University Place, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; E-mail: jonathan.hill@manchester.ac.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Associations between low birth weight and prenatal anxiety and later psychopathology may arise from programming effects likely to be adaptive under some, but not other, environmental exposures and modified by sex differences. If physiological reactivity, which also confers vulnerability or resilience in an environment-dependent manner, is associated with birth weight and prenatal anxiety, it will be a candidate to mediate the links with psychopathology. From a general population sample of 1,233 first-time mothers recruited at 20 weeks gestation, a sample of 316 stratified by adversity was assessed at 32 weeks and when their infants were aged 29 weeks (N = 271). Prenatal anxiety was assessed by self-report, birth weight from medical records, and vagal reactivity from respiratory sinus arrhythmia during four nonstressful and one stressful (still-face) procedure. Lower birth weight for gestational age predicted higher vagal reactivity only in girls (interaction term, p = .016), and prenatal maternal anxiety predicted lower vagal reactivity only in boys (interaction term, p = .014). These findings are consistent with sex differences in fetal programming, whereby prenatal risks are associated with increased stress reactivity in females but decreased reactivity in males, with distinctive advantages and penalties for each sex.

Information

Type
Regular Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Sample recruitment.

Figure 1

Table 1. Summary of measures on boys and girls in the intensive sample of mothers and infants

Figure 2

Figure 2. (Color online). Summary of structural equation modeling analysis of effects of fetal growth and maternal anxiety during pregnancy on infants’ baseline vagal tone and vagal response to the still-face (differential item) condition (the negative of vagal withdrawal). Standardized coefficients with bold, p ≤ .05. G, girls; B, boys. The broken lines show differential item effects on the still-face condition. The negative coefficient for the effect of fetal growth in girls (–0.673) reflects increasing vagal withdrawal associated with lower growth. The positive coefficient for the effect of maternal anxiety in boys (0.286) reflects decreasing vagal withdrawal associated with increasing anxiety. Model goodness-of-fit, χ2 (20) = 62.18, comparative fit index = 0.94, root mean square error of approximation = 0.04.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (Color online). Regression lines of the interaction between infant sex and prenatal risk showing increasing vagal withdrawal with decreasing fetal growth (g/weeks gestation at birth) in females (red online, solid) but not males (black, sold), and decreasing vagal withdrawal with increasing maternal anxiety in males (black, dashed) but not in females (red online, dashed).