Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T15:14:12.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Target technology development for the research of high energy density physics and inertial fusion at the RFNC–VNIIEF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2009

V.M. Izgorodin*
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
F.M. Abzaev
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
A.P. Balyaev
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
A.V. Bessarab
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
I.N. Cherkesova
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
V.V. Chulkov
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
D.Yu. Fenoshin
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
S.G. Garanin
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
V.G. Gogolev
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
A.G. Golubinsky
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
Yu.V. Ignat'ev
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
D.A. Irinichev
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
A.E. Lachtikov
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
A.P. Morovov
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
V.V. Nazarov
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
G.P. Nikolaev
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
A.P. Pepelyaev
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
A.V. Pinegin
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
I.M. Rojz
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
V.N. Romaev
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
E.Yu. Solomatina
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
M.G. Vasin
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
A.V. Veselov
Affiliation:
The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: V.M. Izgorodin, The Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF), 607190 Sarov, Mira Street 37, Nizhniy Novgorod region, Russia. E-mail: izgorodin@otd13.vniief.ru

Abstract

Results in some directions of the target technology for research on high energy density and laser fusion at the Russian Federal Nuclear Centre–All-Russia Research Institute of Experimental Physics for the last three years are presented. The results of development of optical and X-ray methods of characterization and manufacturing techniques of targets for studying the equation-of-state at high pressures and the condensed rare gas targets for the influence of pulse-repeated laser irradiation are given.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the profiler based on scanning white light technique and the Linnik interferometer MII-4.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Intensity from single pixel during scan.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Reconstructed shell surfaces (100 µm × 70 µm). (a) The interference pattern on external and internal surfaces of the shell of 330 µm diameter and 3.1 µm thick wall. (b) 3D image of a segment of the shell with 330 µm diameter and 3.1 µm thick wall. (c) 3D image of a segment of the shell with 310 µm diameter and 3.6 µm thick wall.

Figure 3

Table 1. Parameters of shells

Figure 4

Fig. 4. The scheme of measurements of gas amount in microspheres.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Spectrum of X-ray radiation of the target filled with T and argon.

Figure 6

Table 2. Definition of gas pressure in microspheres

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Spectrum of X-ray radiation of the shells filled with sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).

Figure 8

Table 3. Results of comparison of calculated and experimental value of factor k

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Dependence of a relative mistake of film thickness measurement by RFA (1) and absorptive (2) methods.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Scheme of measurement of film parameters. (1) the X-ray tube, (2) secondary target, (3, 3a) X-ray detectors, (4) sample, (5) collimator, (6) scanning diaphragm, (7) diaphragm.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Intensity of fluorescence of a Pb film (1) and copper mandrel (2) in various points of scanning (excitation from side of Pb film).

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Intensity of characteristic radiation quantum of a secondary target past the Cu-Al sample depending on scanning coordinates. (1) target from germanium (ЕКa = 9.88 кэВ), (2) target from nickel (ЕКa = 7.47 кэВ).

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Impulse number dependence on time received by the counter (sample set 1).

Figure 14

Fig. 12. Impulse number dependence on time received by the counter (sample set 2).

Figure 15

Fig. 13. Impulse number dependence on time received by the counter (sample set 3).

Figure 16

Table 4. Factors values in Eq. (9)

Figure 17

Fig. 14. Radiation power spectrum of sample set 2 (not covered).

Figure 18

Fig. 15. Radiation power spectrum of sample set 3 (covered).

Figure 19

Table 5. Calculated values of T concentration in the samples (1018 sm−3)

Figure 20

Table 6. Average T concentration values for different samples (1018 cm−3)

Figure 21

Fig. 16. Experimental and calculated spectra of β-electrons braking radiation in microsphere.

Figure 22

Table 7. Estimated concentration of T in time right after saturation (1018 cm−3)

Figure 23

Fig. 17. The scheme of EOS target. On the left is an arrangement of layers, on the right is disposition of a target on the holder: (1) the holder, (2) target, (3) aperture for adjustment.

Figure 24

Fig. 18. Microinterferograms of base plate surface ((a) before pressing, (b) after pressing).

Figure 25

Fig. 19. 3D image of a step surface with height 11.2 µm .

Figure 26

Fig. 20. 3D images of steps on Al foil made by means of two-level matrixes, the width of a mean plane is 100 µm, steps heights are: (a) 9.7 and 16.5 µm, (b) 7.4 and 6 µm, (c) 3 and 10 µm.

Figure 27

Fig. 21. Interferogram received on micro-interferometer MII-4 of the target with Al and Cu steps (heights 7 and 5 µm ) on a Cu base plate (thickness 40 µm ).

Figure 28

Fig. 22. Surface structures of the copper film (a) and the Pb film (b), measured with an AFM.

Figure 29

Fig. 23. Interference fringes received by micro-interferometer МII-4 on a surface of an Al layer with thickness12.6 µm deposited on a glass substrate (a) and polished NaCl substrate (b).

Figure 30

Fig. 24. Surface profile of an aluminum layer with thickness 12.6 µm on NaCl substrate, measured with AFM.

Figure 31

Fig. 25. A three-stage target manufactured by crucible evaporating aluminum with consequent precise displacement of mask.

Figure 32

Fig. 26. Fluorescence intensity of Pb film (the top curve) and copper mandrel (the bottom curve) in various points of scanning (excitation from side of Al film).

Figure 33

Fig. 27. Intensity of characteristic radiation of a secondary target passed through the Pb-Al sample versus scanning coordinate. The bottom curve – a nickel target (ЕКa = 7.472 KeV), the top curve is a zirconium target (ЕКa = 15.746 KeV).

Figure 34

Fig. 28. Instrumental energy spectra of alpha particles at copper film measurement (FWHM is line width on half-height).

Figure 35

Fig. 29. The block diagram of the jet generator. (1) the pipeline, (2) condenser, (3) store of liquefied gas, (4) nozzle, (5) jet.

Figure 36

Table 8. Results of gas flow parameters calculations without condensation

Figure 37

Fig. 30. Dependences of the liquid consumption (a) and gas velocity (b) on distance in the condenser. The curves 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 correspond to temperature of condenser wall of 160, 155, 150, 145 and 140 K.

Figure 38

Fig. 31. Dependences of average temperature (a) and relative radius (b) of a jet on time for initial diameters 20 µm (1) and 40 µm (2).

Figure 39

Table 9. Operating conditions of nozzle unit for different gases

Figure 40

Fig. 32. A view of a condensed noble gases jet under vertical arrangement. (1) Ar, (2) Kr, (3) Xe.

Figure 41

Fig. 33. A looks of jet of 20 mcm diameter under horizontal arrangement. (a) Kr (temperature 130–140 K, pressure 0.4–0.5 MPa), (b) Xe (temperature 170–180 K, pressure 0.4–0.5 MPa).

Figure 42

Fig. 34. Schematic image of temperature fluctuations of nozzle unit and states of jet. The shaded area is transitive when there is a change of aggregative state of jet substance.

Figure 43

Fig. 35. Photos of a Xe jet in liquid (a) and solid (b) state.

Figure 44

Fig. 36. Photo of the liquid Xe outflow through nozzle with three apertures.

Figure 45

Fig. 37. Video of jet failure under action of single laser pulse. (1) jet before pulse, (2) impact of a laser pulse on jet, (3) failure of jet, (4) beginning of jet restoration, (5) restored jet.

Figure 46

Fig. 38. Picture of action of the laser radiation on three liquid jets.