Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:37:54.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How to minimize the sampling effort for obtaining reliable estimates of diel and annual CO2 budgets in lichens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2009

Maaike Y. BADER
Affiliation:
Functional Ecology of Plants, Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Oldenburg, P.O. Box 2503, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany. Email: maaike.bader@uni-oldenburg.de
Gerhard ZOTZ
Affiliation:
Functional Ecology of Plants, Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Oldenburg, P.O. Box 2503, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany. Email: maaike.bader@uni-oldenburg.de
Otto L. LANGE
Affiliation:
Department of Botany II, Julius-von-Sachs-Institute for Biosciences, University of Würzburg, Julius-von-Sachs-Platz 3, 97082 Würzburg, Germany.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Estimating carbon budgets for poikilohydric organisms, such as lichens and bryophytes, requires methods other than those for homoiohydric plants due to a strong dependency of carbon gain on fluctuating hydration. This paper provides guidance with respect to optimal sampling strategies for estimating annual carbon budgets of lichens and bryophytes, based on a one-year dataset of half-hourly CO2-exchange readings on the epilithic placodioid lichen Lecanora muralis (syn. Protoparmeliopsis muralis) and tests the effects of reduced sampling frequencies and different temporal sampling schemes on carbon budget estimates. Both fine-scale sampling (measurements within a day) and large-scale sampling (selection of days within a year) are addressed.

Lowering the sampling frequency within a day caused large deviations for 24-h (diel) budget estimates. Averaged over a larger number of days, these errors did not necessarily cause a large deviation in the annual budget estimate. However, the occurrence of extreme deviations in diel budgets could strongly offset the annual budget estimate. To avoid this problem, frequent sampling (c. every 1·5 hours) is necessary for estimating annual budgets. For estimating diel budgets and patterns a more frequent sampling (every c. 0·5 hours, balancing data resolution and disturbance) is often needed.

Sampling fewer than 365 days in a given year inevitably caused estimates to deviate from the ‘true’ carbon budget, i.e. the annual budget based on half-hourly measurements during 365 days. Accuracy increased with total sample frequency, and blocking days caused larger deviations than sampling randomly or regularly spaced single days. Restricting sampling to only one season led to strongly biased estimates. The sampling effort required for a reliable estimate of the annual carbon balance of lichens based on simple extrapolations of diel carbon budgets is impracticably large. For example, a relatively large sample of 52 random days yielded an estimate within 25% of the true annual budget with only 60% certainty. Supporting approaches are therefore suggested, in particular extrapolating diel budgets using ‘weather response types’, possibly aided by diel activity patterns from chlorophyll fluorescence, or modelling CO2 exchange as a function of climatic conditions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Some typical carbon exchange patterns in Lecanora muralis. A–C, diel carbon exchange; A, low activity throughout the day and night (thallus moist but activity limited by suprasaturation depression); B, no activity (carbon gain = 0) until thallus is wetted around midday, then some resaturation respiration followed by high photosynthesis, followed by drying and another rain event, after which the thallus remains moist and active during the following night; C, thallus very wet during the night and morning, then as thallus dries out suprasaturation depression is lifted and photosynthesis peaks, until after further drying activity ceases; D, diel carbon budgets (tAdiel) throughout the year (1995–1996). (For descriptions of more types of diel patterns, see Lange 2003a).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Effect of sampling frequency during a day on eAdiel in Lecanora muralis (y-axis) for 30 random days, ordered chronologically (x-axis). Horizontal bars indicate tAdiel. The two days marked (9 = 2 October 1995, see Fig. 1C, 28 = 4 July 1996) showed a large and directional deviation with increasing measuring interval.

Figure 2

Table 1 Effect of regular sampling throughout the day at various intervals on the deviation (mean ± SD) of the estimated (eAdiel) from the real (tAdiel, based on 0·5-hourly sampling) diel carbon budget and on the estimated annual carbon budget (eAann) in Lecanora muralis. These statistics are based on 30 randomly selected days, or these selected days without two strongly deviating days*. The true annual carbon budget (tAann, based on 365 days of 0·5-hourly sampling) was 21·5 g C m−2 y−1.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Effect of various sampling patterns and intensities (x-axis) on the quality of the resulting annual carbon budget estimate in Lecanora muralis: probabilities of eAann being within 2·5% (black bottom dots), 5%, 10%, 25% and 50% (lightest grey upper dots) of tAann, based on 10 000 permutations. A, randomly drawn single days; B, randomly drawn single days stratified according to season; C, single block of varying length starting on a randomly drawn date; D, one block of varying length per season, starting on random days.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Standard deviations of eAann in Lecanora muralis for different sampling schemes. Based on 10 000 permutations (random days and blocks) or all possible sets of regularly spaced days (e.g. 121 days sampled = one sample every three days, giving only three possible sets). Sampling per season means that eAann was estimated from an equal number of days from each season. The mean of the permutations was always within 2% and the mean of all sets of regularly spaced days was always within 6% of tAann (21·5 g C m−2 y−1).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. The probability of eAann being within 2·5% (○), 5% (●), 10% (□), 25% (■) and 50% (△) of tAann in Lecanora muralis when applying various sampling intensities (A, 12 days/y; B, 24 days/y; C, 52 days/y; D, 104 days/y) distributed over 1 to n blocks (x-axis) starting on randomly drawn days. Based on 10 000 permutations.

Figure 6

Table 2 Effect of regular sampling of days at various intervals throughout the year, from every day to once every four weeks, on the quality of the resulting annual carbon budget estimate (eAann; or tAann for an interval of 1 day) for Lecanora muralis (in g C m−2 y−1). Statistics based on all possible sets of measuring days (e.g. for weekly sampling: Monday through Sunday, n = number of permutations = 7).

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Estimates of the annual carbon budget (eAann) in Lecanora muralis based on various sampling intensities in different seasons; A, randomly drawn single days; B, blocks of days starting on a random day. Means (symbols) and standard deviations (error bars) are based on 10 000 permutations. ‘All seasons’ is a random sampling stratified by season (A), or a block in each season, starting on random days (B). Starting days of blocks were restrained so that the block would not exceed the season. The variation in mean eAann in B is due to the relative over-sampling of days in the middle of these seasons, which happened to have, for instance, relatively low diel carbon balances in autumn and spring.