Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T06:58:01.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do loading path and specimen thickness affect the brittle compressive failure of ice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

A.L. Fortt
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-8000, USA E-mail: andrew.l.fortt@dartmouth.edu
E.M. Schulson
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-8000, USA E-mail: andrew.l.fortt@dartmouth.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Compressive experiments were performed on square (160 mm × 160 mm) prismatic specimens of columnar-grained, S2 freshwater ice, biaxially loaded across the columns at −10°C. The work focused on brittle behavior, achieved by deforming the specimens at an applied strain rate of 4.5 ± 1.2 × 10 3s 1 in the direction of shortening. The results show that the specimen thickness (25–150 mm) has no detectable effect on the terminal failure strength of the ice. Likewise, the strength of the ice when loaded under proportional loading, where the minor stress varies during the test, was similar to that when loaded under a constant minor stress, implying that terminal failure depends only on the stress state and not on the path taken.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2007
Figure 0

Fig. 1.(a) Composite polarized photograph of laboratory-grown freshwater ice specimen microstructure. (b) Schematic representation of loading stage. In the proportional-loading procedure σ22 = Rσ11. In the constant minor stress procedure σ22 is constant.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.The σ11-σ22 loading path for the proportional-loading and constant minor stress procedures.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.(a, b) Stress–time curves from (a) a proportionally loaded test and (b) a constant minor stress test. (c, d) Photographs of a faulted specimen (X3 = ~50 mm) showing conjugate faults from (c) a test performed under proportional loading, corresponding to the stress–time curve in (a), and (d) a test performed under constant minor stress, corresponding to the stress–time curve in (b).

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Failure stresses obtained using the proportional-loading procedure, grouped according to specimen thickness. All specimens possessed dimensions of X1 = X2 = ~160 mm. The value listed in the legend is that for the thickness. Note the different scales on the abscissa and ordinate. (a) X3 = ~25 mm; (b) X3 = ~50 mm; (c) X3 = ~75 mm; and (d) X3 = ~150 mm. All data grouped together.

Figure 4

Table 1.Parametric values obtained from applying a linear trend to the data in each thickness bin and combining all the data (Σ)

Figure 5

Fig. 5.Comparison of failure stresses obtained using the proportional-loading and constant minor stress procedures. Note the different scales on the abscissa and ordinate.