Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T21:55:02.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron-beam additive manufacturing of high-temperature metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2016

Lawrence E. Murr
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, USA; lemurr@utep.edu
Shujun Li
Affiliation:
Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; shjli@imr.ac.cn

Abstract

This article overviews electron-beam melting (EBM), including process optimization issues. Examples of EBM-fabricated components described include hexagonal close-packed Ti-6Al-4V, face-centered-cubic René 142 (a Ni-based superalloy), and body-centered-cubic pure iron, corresponding to a melt temperature range from 1375°C to 1630°C. Residual microstructures observed for these fabricated components by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy include equilibrium as well as nonequilibrium features, which illustrate prospects for novel structure–property manipulation in the EBM process. The EBM process relies on available pre-alloyed, precursor powders that are selectively melted layer by layer by a computer-aided design scanned electron beam to form relatively small, but often complex, products or components. Direct metal deposition innovations capable of truly three-dimensional metal printing are described, especially high-temperature metals and alloys for future additive manufacturing technologies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic view of Arcam electron-beam melting (EBM) system. The inset shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of Inconel 625 (Ni-based superalloy) powder typical of precursor powders for EBM. (1) The electron gun (60 kV) and electron optical system; (2) the scanning electron beam; (3) powder cassettes; (4) the build product table. Note: r, powder rake. Magnification marker in the SEM image is 40 μm.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematic rendering of melt (L)–solidification (S) growth in electron-beam melting, which can promote columnar (directional) microstructures. Preferred crystal orientations for face-centered-cubic metals and alloys are also shown. Note: v, scan speed; s, scan lines.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Optical microscope views of electron-beam melting fabricated Ti-6Al-4V components. (a) Double-melt scan to produce large, lens-like α grains (hexagonal close-packed) surrounded by a thin (dark) β (body-centered-cubic) phase. (b) Rapidly cooled thin component section producing closely spaced αʹ platelets (dark). Magnification markers are 25 μm.

Figure 3

Figure 4. 3D sectional view of a René 142 Ni-based superalloy component exhibiting columnar 〈200〉 grains containing cuboidal γʹ phase (face-centered-cubic [fcc]) Ni3 (Al, Ta) precipitates shown in the scanning electron microscope image inset. Precipitates are separated by fcc Ni-Cr (γ phase). Note: B, build direction (the z-direction in Figure 2).8

Figure 4

Figure 5. Transmission electron microscope image showing coherent γ/γʹ cuboidal precipitates in René 142 alloy components shown in the scanning electron microscope inset in Figure 4.8

Figure 5

Figure 6. Equiaxed ferrite (body-centered-cubic [bcc]) grains in a pure iron electron-beam melting component containing δ-phase (bcc) nonequilibrium phase platelets. Note: B, build direction.10

Figure 6

Figure 7. X-ray diffraction spectra corresponding to Figure 6 showing prominent α and δ peaks in vertical and horizontal plane sections.10

Figure 7

Figure 8. Transmission electron microscope image of a ferrite (111) grain showing irregular δ-phase platelets coincident with the A [1$\bar 1$0] and B [$\bar 1$01] directions. The operating reflection is shown at g. Note: GB, grain boundary.10

Figure 8

Figure 9. Schematic diagram representing direct metal droplet deposition described conceptually by Orme and Smith. Reprinted with permission from Reference 12. © 2000 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.