Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:19:24.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Causes and implications of Mid- to Late Holocene relative sea-level change in the Gulf of Kachchh, western India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2020

Shubhra Sharma*
Affiliation:
Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad-380009, India
Gaurav Chauhan
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, The K.S.K.V. Kachchh University, Bhuj-370001, India
Anil Dutt Shukla
Affiliation:
Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad-380009, India
Romi Nambiar
Affiliation:
Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad-380009, India
Ravi Bhushan
Affiliation:
Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad-380009, India
Bhawanisingh G. Desai
Affiliation:
Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Raisan Village, Gandhinagar-382009, India
Shilpa Pandey
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeoscience, Lucknow-226007, India
Madhavi Dabhi
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, The K.S.K.V. Kachchh University, Bhuj-370001, India
Subhash Bhandari
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, The K.S.K.V. Kachchh University, Bhuj-370001, India
Suraj Bhosale
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, The K.S.K.V. Kachchh University, Bhuj-370001, India
Abhishek Lakhote
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, The K.S.K.V. Kachchh University, Bhuj-370001, India
Navin Juyal
Affiliation:
Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad-380009, India
*
*Corresponding author at: Department of Geography, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India-221005. E-mail address: shubshubhra@gmail.com; shubhra@bhu.ac.in (S. Sharma).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relict intertidal deposits from the Kharod River Estuary, Gulf of Kachchh, and the distal end of Kori Creek are used to infer the Mid- to Late Holocene relative sea-level (RSL) change in western India. Employing sedimentology, geochemistry, palynology, ichnology, and optical and radiocarbon dating, the study suggests the dominance of fluvial activity between 16.5 ± 1.6 and 9.9 ± 0.7 ka. After ~7 ka (7.3 ± 0.4, 6.8 ± 0.5 ka), the sea level showed a positive tendency until 4.7 ± 0.2 ka. The tectonically corrected Mid-Holocene RSL change is estimated as 1.45 ± 0.33 m between ~7 and ~5 ka. The study suggests that the Mid-Holocene RSL high was due to the meltwater contribution from the Himalayan cryosphere, with subordinate contribution from glacio-isostatic adjustment and crustal subsidence. The Late Holocene tectonically corrected RSL change at ~1 ka (1.1 ± 0.1 ka and 1045 ± 175 cal yr BP) is estimated as 0.53 ± 0.43 m. This is ascribed to monsoon wind-driven tidal ingression that might have affected the tidal amplitude positively. The study suggests that the Mid-Holocene RSL change did not play a deterministic role in the abandonment of the Harappan coastal settlements.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2020
Figure 0

Figure 1. In the inset map of India and (A) Gulf of Kachchh region, the colored dots mark the locations of various studies. The red rectangle marks the location of the enlarged map. (B) Digital Elevation Map of Kachchh peninsula showing major and minor thrusts (modified after Biswas, 2016). Sites investigated in the present study are marked in white circles: the Kharod Estuary (Site-1a), the river section (Site-1b), the India Bridge section (Site-2), and the Nani Cher Estuary section (Site-3). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 1

Figure 2. (color online) Geomorphological maps of Site-1a (Kharod Estuary section), Site-1b (Kharod River section), Site-2 (Indian Bridge), and Site-3 (Nani Cher).

Figure 2

Table 1. Details of intertidal deposits and the chronology that are used as SLIPS (Sea-Level Index Points). For comparison we give RSL estimates from two indicative ranges (IR1 and IR2) following the same protocol (for details see Supplementary Tables S1–S3). RSL1 is estimated using IR1, and RSL2 is estimated using IR2. As can be seen, the RSL does not vary significantly (it fluctuates within the errors). Average RSL values are calculated and corrected for tectonic component from RSL1. All values are in meters above mean sea level (m amsl). At the Kharod Estuary/river and IB sections the uplift rates are 0.13 ± 0.01 mm/yr and 0.2 ± 0.01 mm/yr, respectively.

Figure 3

Table 2. Tide gauge data recorded at the mouth of the Gulf of Kachchh near Okha (west and southwest of the studied sites) (Babu et al., 2005), Mandavi (near Kharod Estuary), and Jakahu port near Kori Creek (Gujarat Maritime Board).

Figure 4

Figure 3. (color online) (A) Cross-section profile generated using Total Station survey data from the Gulf of Kachchh (GK) to the Kharod River section. Low tide mark (LTM) elevation as of April 7, 2017. (B) Field photograph showing locations of Kharod River and estuary sections (Site-1a and Site-1b). (C) Field photographs of the Kharod Estuary and (D) younger beach ridge (YBR) with close-up. (E)–(F) Field photos and cross-section profile at Site-2 near India Bridge.

Figure 5

Figure 4. (A) Close-ups of trace fossils and mud-lined burrow (mlb), which are filled with passive sediments from the upper bioturbated section of unit-III. (B) Close-up of Kharod Estuary section with optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) sample locations (red circles). (C) The stratigraphic details along with the OSL ages. The average differential global positioning system (DGPS) elevation of the modern lower intertidal flat (n = 30) corresponds to Mean Low Water Spring (MLWS) and Mean Low Water Neap (MLWN) range. The high tide (HT) is the level of high tide marked on the day of survey (April). (D) Corg, Ntotal, and C/N ratio obtained on unit-II and -III indicate dominance of marine organic matter. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 6

Figure 5. (A) Close-up field photographs of the Kharod River section with location of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) samples (red circles). (B) Stratigraphic details along with the OSL ages. The average differential global positioning system (DGPS) elevation of the modern middle tidal flat (n = 20) corresponds to Mean Low Water Neap (MLWN) and Mean High Water Neap (MHWN). (C) Corg, Ntotal, and C/N ratio indicate dominance of marine organic matter. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 7

Figure 6. (A) Close-up field photograph of the India Bridge (INB) sediment profile, optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) samples (red circles), and radiocarbon locations samples (yellow circle). The average differential global positioning system (DGPS) elevation (n = 6) of the modern upper tidal flat at Sunda High (white inverted triangle) corresponds to Mean High Water Spring (MHWS) and Mean High Water Neap (MHWN) range. (B) Stratigraphy details along with the OSL ages. Es is also marked considering the low (marine) C/N ratio. (C) Note that units-I and -II showing low Corg, C/N ratio, and relatively high Ntotal suggesting deposition under a distal intertidal environment. Black arrow marks the break in trend (increased aeolian influence). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 8

Figure 7. (A) Field photograph showing the panoramic view of Nani Cher Estuary, location of the section excavated is shown by a white rectangle. (B) Close-up of unit-II showing iron slag in archaeological deposit. (C) Field photograph and (D) stratigraphic details of the section. Note that unit-I continues below the modern intertidal flat. The radiocarbon age (yellow circle) of 3210 ± 155 cal yr BP (Kld-shell) is obtained on Turbinella pyrum (conch shell) collected ~60 cm above the high tide (HT) (May 2017), and the sediment sample (red circle) is dated to 2.9 ± 0.2 ka. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 9

Figure 8. (color online) The plot of upper continental Crust (UCC) (Taylor and McLennan, 1985) normalized trace elements from the Kharod Estuary section (units-II and -III), Kharod River section (unit-V), and modern tidal clay. The normalized trace element values of Kharod River catchment lithology (basalt) and the Indus delta sediments (Keti Bunder; Clift et al., 2010) are also shown.

Figure 10

Table 3. Average values of trace element concentrations from dominant lithology, modern intertidal sediments, and different sedimentary units plotted in Figure 8 are given. The range of concentration is given in parentheses.

Figure 11

Table 4. Details of the samples, number of aliquots used (N), radioactivity details, over dispersion (OD), central age model (CAM) equivalent dose (De), dose rate, and ages obtained for various landforms. Water content used 10 ± 5% (Fuchs et al., 2014).

Figure 12

Table 5. The radiocarbon ages obtained on samples collected from India Bridge and Nani Cher. The reservoir correction age (ΔR ± σ) was 135 ± 86 years (Bhushan et al., 1994; Dutta et al., 2001).

Figure 13

Figure 9. Age-elevation plot of the mid and late sea-level index points (SLIPs) and terrestrial and marine limiting points. The associated errors in RSL and chronology are shown by vertical and horizontal bars, respectively. The Mid-Holocene RSL (~7–5 ka) (blue stippling) is the average of RSL based on SLIPs at Sites-1a and -1b. Based on terrestrial limiting data points, we suggest that the negative tendency might have begun ~4.5 ka. The Late Holocene RSL (~1 ka) (blue stippling) is marked from SLIP at Site-2. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Supplementary material: File

Sharma et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S3 and Tables S1-S4

Download Sharma et al. supplementary material(File)
File 21.1 MB