Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:47:57.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary Evaluation of Natural Antibacterial Clays for Treating Wound Infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Lynda B. Williams*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
Suzannah M. Schmidt-Malan
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Dept. of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Robin Patel
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Dept. of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Dept. of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: lynda.williams@asu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The overuse of antibiotics in medicine has led to concerns over management of wound infections where antibiotic-resistant bacteria are involved. Wound infections exhibit both acquired and biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance; innovative non-antibiotic therapeutic and preventive treatments are needed to limit emergence of conventional antimicrobial resistance and to address biofilm-associated resistance. Toward this goal, natural antibacterial clays have been identified that are effective at killing drug-resistant human pathogens in planktonic and biofilm states, in vitro. To move toward clinical testing of antibacterial clays, the present study was conducted to evaluate the topical application of a natural antibacterial clay to wounds in mice experimentally infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Five preliminary animal trials were conducted to test various methods of applying hydrated antibacterial clay to infected wounds. None of the experiments yielded significantly reduced MRSA infection in vivo, compared to controls. Several hypotheses were tested to explore the diminished clay antibacterial activity in vivo including: (1) pH and Eh of mineral-bacterial suspensions may differ in wound fluids compared to growth media; (2) antibacterial reactants may complex with components of the wound; (3) hydrated clays may dry out in the wound; and (4) limited dissolved oxygen may reduce Fenton reactions. Ancillary in vitro tests were performed to explore these hypotheses. Results indicate that the clay application to wounds may require enhanced oxidation and possibly a longer treatment regimen. The experimental results foster understanding of the natural clay–bacterial interactions in wounds and may improve designs for medicinal applications.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 2021
Figure 0

Table 1 Bacterial biofilm species studied (modified from Caflisch et al., 2018)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Results of the OMT Blue clay and aqueous leachate (200 mg clay/mL, shaken 24 h) treatment of established staphylococcal biofilms. Error bars are from triplicate independent experiments, with statistical significance p < 0.05

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Structural schematic of smectite showing layered tetrahedral (green) and octahedral (yellow) sheets of the silicate framework. Blue spheres represent interlayer hydrated metal ions attracted to the basal planes (modified from Williams et al., 2009)

Figure 3

Fig. 3. SIMS ion images across an Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) cell. a12C14N image of a single cell indicating cross section A-A’; b cross-section showing the distribution of Al/CN before (blue) and after (red) treatment with antibacterial clay; c cross-section showing the distribution of Fe/CN (modified from Londoño et al., 2017)

Figure 4

Table 2 List of experimental groups including: the inoculant, infection time, wound punch size used for culture at end of treatment, clay concentration used, frequency and length of treatment, and the rationale for each experiment

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Photograph of established Staphylococcus aureus (IDRL-6169) wound infection.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Culture results of five animal experiments, where infected mice were treated with OMT-Blue clay, compared to controls and untreated infected wounds, over 5 days, with daily changes of wound dressing. Graphs a–e represent experiments 1–5 (Table 2). Black box = range; red lines = average; blue lines = standard deviation of each experiment (n = 3)

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Animal wound sizes over 5 days of treatment with the OMT Blue clay, compared to controls and untreated infected wounds. Graphs a–e represent experiments 1–5 (Table 2). Black box = range; red lines = average; blue lines = standard deviation of each experiment (n = 3)

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Purulence assessments over 5 days of treatment with the OMT Blue clay, compared to controls and untreated infected wounds. Graphs a–e represent experiments 1–5 (Table 2). Black box = range; red lines = average; blue lines = standard deviation of each experiment (n = 3)

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Comparison of pH-Eh trends over time for a 100 mg/mL OMT Blue clay suspension compared to standard reference minerals smectite (SWy-1) and illite (IMt-1) from the Source Clays Repository of The Clay Minerals Society (www.clays.org)

Figure 10

Table 3 Mineral suspension and leachate pH-Eh changes after incubation with Staphylococcus aureus (IDRL-6169) over 24 h at 37°C

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Results showing the effect of components of simulated wound fluid (SWF) on planktonic Staphylococcus aureus (IDRL-6169) reduction in the presence of the OMT Blue and Red (control) clays over 24 h

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Results showing the effect of components of SWF in the presence of OMT Blue and Red (control) clays on reducing Staphylococcus aureus (IDRL-6169) biofilms over 24 h

Figure 13

Table 4 Effect of fetal calf serum (FCS) simulated wound fluid (SWF) and blood on the pH-Eh of clay and bacterial suspensions incubated 24 h at 37°C

Figure 14

Table 5 Comparison of the pH-Eh of OMT Blue and Red clays equilibrated with hydrogel (HG) and deionized water (DIW) for 24 h

Figure 15

Fig. 11. Comparison of OMT Blue and Red (control) clays reacted with Staphylococcus aureus (IDRL-6169) biofilms in deionized water and hydrogel for 24 h at 37°C

Figure 16

Fig. 12. Treatment of the OMT Blue clay with chitosan or lithium incorporation in the octahedral sheet did not change the activity of the clay in reducing Staphylococcus aureus (IDRL-6169) biofilms