Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:18:12.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Facile preparation of macro-mesoporous zirconium titanate monoliths via a sol–gel reaction accompanied by phase separation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

Mingliang Sun
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cluster Science of Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102488, China
Tianbo Zhao*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cluster Science of Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102488, China
Zhaofei Ma
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cluster Science of Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102488, China
Zunfeng Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cluster Science of Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102488, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: bit_bipt@126.com

Abstract

Macro-mesoporous zirconium titanate monoliths have been successfully prepared via a sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation, with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) as a phase separation inducer and N-methylformamide (NFA) as a gelation accelerator. The size and morphology of macropores are controlled by the PEO and NFA amount. By choosing appropriate starting composition, the co-continuous structure could be obtained. The as-dried gel is amorphous, the pore size is in the range of 0.05–0.5 μm, the porosity is 46%, and the surface area is 111 m2/g. After heat treatment at 500 °C, the gel transforms into the phase ZrTiO4, the macropore diameter decreases slightly, the porosity increases to 63%, and the surface area decreases to 40 m2/g. Moreover, the macroporous structure is well maintained, and the skeleton becomes dense and smooth. The samples have macropores, mesopores, and micropores before and after heat treatment.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

TABLE I: Starting compositions of the samples (in grams).

Figure 1

Figure 1: (a–g) SEM images of dried gels prepared with varied PEO amount: (a) ZT-1, (b) ZT-2, (c) ZT-3, (d) ZT-4, (e) ZT-5, (f) ZT-6, and (g) ZT-7. (h) Appearance of a dried gel ZT-5.

Figure 2

Figure 2: (a–c) SEM images of dried gels prepared with varied NFA amount: (a) ZT-8, (b) ZT-9, and (c) ZT-10.

Figure 3

Figure 3: (a–c) TG-DTA curves. (d) FT-IR spectra of the dried gel ZT-5 (red line) and PEO (black line).

Figure 4

Figure 4: The sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation of the ZrO2–TiO2 system.

Figure 5

Figure 5: (a) XRD patterns of sample ZT-5 heat treated at different temperatures. (b) SEM image, (c) EDS, and (d–f) two-dimensional maps for Zr, Ti, and O, respectively, of ZT-5 heat treated at 500 °C.

Figure 6

Figure 6: (a) XPS survey spectrum and (b, c) detailed XPS spectra of Zr 3d and Ti 2p, respectively, of ZT-5 heat treated at 500 °C.

Figure 7

Figure 7: TEM and HRTEM images of ZT-5 before (a, b) and after (c, d) heat treatment at 500 °C.

Figure 8

Figure 8: (a, b) Macropore size distributions, (c) nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms, and (d) DFT pore size distributions of sample ZT-5 heat treated at various temperatures.

Figure 9

TABLE II: Structural properties of as-dried and heat-treated ZT-5.