Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:14:19.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Sound of Magic? Bells in Roman Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2018

Hella Eckardt
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Readingh.eckardt@reading.ac.uk
Sandie Williams
Affiliation:
High Wycombe, Bucks. sandie.williams2williams@btinternet.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bells are recorded in many published excavation reports from Roman sites, but there has been no previous study of the British material. This paper explores the significance of bells in the Roman world from both a ritual and a functional perspective. We create a first typology of Romano-British bells, provide an understanding of their chronology and examine any spatial and social differences in their use. Special attention is paid to bells from funerary or ritual contexts in order to explore the symbolic significance of these small objects. Bells from other parts of the Roman world are considered to provide comparisons with those from Roman Britain. The paper demonstrates that small bells were used as protective charms and may have been preferentially placed into the graves of children and young women. The paper identifies a new, probably Roman type of bell that has no parallels within the Empire, although similar pieces occur in first- and second-century graves in the Black Sea region.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Terminology and common loop shapes. (Original images by Sandie Williams and Amy Atkins)

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Bell typology: Type 1: Quadrangular bells (after No. 32, Colchester: Crummy 1992, fig. 5.51.1663); Type 2: Domed bells (after No. 92, Coventina's Well: Allason-Jones and McKay 1985, fig. 67; and No. 57, Colchester: Crummy 1983, fig. 54.1811); Type 3: Conical bells (after No. 102, Trentholme Drive, York: Wenham 1968, fig. 36.7); Type 4: Tulip bells (after No. 3, Loughor: Marvell and Owen-John 1997, fig. 101.158); Type 5: Shouldered bells (after No. 9, Catterick: Wilson 2002, fig. 301.16); Type 6: Iron bells (after No. 109, Beadlam: Neal 1996, fig. 40.96); Type 7: Miscellaneous and fragmentary bells (after No. 282, Cold Kitchen Hill: unpublished, Devizes Museum DZSWS:2004.240.2).Rumbler bells, not Roman (after No. 23, Verulamium: Frere 1984, fig. 21.195).

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Openwork bells from West Clandon (SUR-B48E74), Fincham (NMS-E837B5), Chippenham (SF-2C7AE4), Chilcomb (HAMP-AF9143) and Great Barton (SF-A755C5).

Figure 3

FIG. 4. The social distribution of all recorded Romano-British bells (total = 303).

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Density map of all recorded bells. (Produced by Rob Fry)

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Distribution of Type 8 openwork bells compared to Norse bells.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Bells with triangular cut-outs from the Black Sea region: Ust-Kamyanka (after Simonenko et al. 2008, pl. 42d), Krasnodar (after Simonenko et al. 2008, pl. 178.6) and Ust'Labinsk (after Nowakowski 1988, fig. 24.12).

Figure 7

FIG. 8. The distribution of perforated bells in the Black Sea region.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Bust of Mercury from Orange, France. (By kind permission of the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris)

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Grave 278 at Colchester. (After Crummy2010, fig. 9)

Figure 10

TABLE 1. OPENWORK BELLS FROM BRITAIN RECORDED BY THE PAS

Figure 11

TABLE 2. COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGIES

Figure 12

TABLE 3. OPENWORK BELLS FROM THE BLACK SEA REGION(this is a sample, given the difficulties of accessing the relevant literature)

Figure 13

TABLE 4. BURIALS WITH BELLS FROM ROMAN BRITAIN