Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:56:58.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transoral robotic resection of a large schwannoma in the retropharyngeal space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

A Gungadeen*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
R Lisseter
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
J Manickavasagam
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK
V Paleri
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Anil Gungadeen, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK E-mail: Anil.Gungadeen@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

External approaches have been traditionally used for the complete excision of large retropharyngeal space lesions.

Case report:

This paper describes a case of a large schwannoma of the retropharyngeal space excised transorally with the use of a robotic system. This lesion measured 2.7 × 1.2 cm in axial dimensions and over 5.8 cm in craniocaudal length. The lesion was delivered en bloc with an intact capsule. No peri- or post-operative complications were encountered. The procedure allowed quick resumption of an oral diet and a return to normal activity for the patient.

Conclusion:

This is, to our knowledge, the first report of this technique used in the excision of a large retropharyngeal space mass.

Information

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging scans of the retropharyngeal mass (asterisks), as seen on axial imaging (a) and T2-weighted coronal imaging (b), showing extension from the level of post-nasal space inferiorly beyond the level of the tongue base.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Surgical steps: (a) and (b) show the location of the paramedian incision in relation to the tongue (‘1’ = Maryland forceps, ‘2’ = 5 mm monopolar diathermy), (c) shows further dissection to identify the correct plane, (d) shows delivery of the upper lobe, and (e) shows delivery of multiple lower lobes.