Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:38:26.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Male wing fanning by the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) produces a courtship song

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

C.A. Villagra*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile
C.F. Pinto
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile
M. Penna
Affiliation:
Programa de Fisiología y Biofísica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile
H.M. Niemeyer*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile
*
*Authors for correspondence Fax: 562 9787445 E-mail: cavillagra@gmail.com, niemeyer@abulafia.ciencias.uchile.cl
*Authors for correspondence Fax: 562 9787445 E-mail: cavillagra@gmail.com, niemeyer@abulafia.ciencias.uchile.cl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We, herein, report evidence that wing fanning by the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) constitutes a courtship song. Complete removal of the forewings or only the distal half of them reduced male copulation success in comparison to intact males. Males that achieved copulation within the observation period produced wing fanning at a higher rate than males that did not copulate. Playback of wing fanning sound altered the behaviour of virgin females, increasing the time they devoted to grooming, as compared with subjects that were exposed to silence or white noise. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the acoustic dimension of the sensory modalities employed by this aphid parasitoid in sexual signalling.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (A) Oscillograms, (B) sonagrams and (C) power spectra of sounds produced by (a) intact, (b) half-dealated and (c) dealated Aphidius ervi males inside the test chamber.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Number of Aphidius ervi males achieving mating or failing to copulate in treatment groups (intact males, half-dealated males and dealated males). Different letters indicate significant differences within each category (▪, copulating; , not copulating).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Wing fanning rate (number of wing fanning events/sec) and (b) courtship duration for intact Aphidius ervi males and half-dealated males. Different letters indicate significant differences at the intra-treatment level (▪, copulating; , not copulating).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Oscillogram, sonogram and power spectrum of the (a) wing fanning and (b) white noise synthetic stimuli.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Proportion of times spent in different behaviours (median and interquartile ranges) by isolated Aphidius ervi females exposed to wing fanning playback, silence and white noise stimuli. Tests lasted 6 min. Letters on top of bars indicate significant differences in inter-treatment comparisons within each behaviour (□, Grooming; , Running; , Quiescent; ▪, Antennation).