Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:44:39.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Short- and long-term outcomes of balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty in children ≤24 months with critical and haemodynamically significant pulmonary valve stenosis: a 20-year single-centre experience in Medellín, Colombia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2026

Andrea Davila-Ruales*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology Fellow, Cardio VID Clinic, Colombia
Sergio Gonzalez-Butron
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology Fellow, Cardio VID Clinic, Colombia
Eliana Cañas
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Cardio VID Clinic, Colombia
Guillermo Aristizabal-Villa
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization, Cardio VID Clinic, Colombia
Rafael Lince-Varela
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization, Cardio VID Clinic, Colombia
*
Corresponding author: Andrea Davila-Ruales; Email: andreadavilar95@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty is the treatment of choice for critical and haemodynamically significant pulmonary stenosis, but long-term outcome data in infants, particularly in Latin America, remain limited. We evaluated long-term outcomes and factors associated with adverse outcomes in children ≤24 months.

Methods:

We retrospectively included consecutive patients ≤24 months who underwent balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty for critical or haemodynamically significant pulmonary stenosis between January 2004 and July 2024. Outcomes included significant restenosis, moderate-or-greater pulmonary regurgitation, pulmonary valve reintervention, and surgical reintervention. Time-to-event outcomes and predictors were assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox regression.

Results:

A total of 129 patients were included (median age 1.5 months; 37.2% with critical pulmonary stenosis). Procedural success was 94.5%. The median right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery gradient decreased from 44 to 7 mmHg (p < 0.001). During a median 7 years follow-up (interquartile range 3–10), significant restenosis occurred in 25.6%, moderate-or-greater pulmonary regurgitation in 19.4%, and 17.8% underwent pulmonary valve reintervention. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated sustained freedom from adverse outcomes throughout follow-up. Univariable Cox regression identified predilation and a higher balloon-to-annulus ratio as factors associated with an increased hazard of significant restenosis and moderate-or-greater pulmonary regurgitation, whereas a larger pulmonary annulus Z-score was associated with a lower hazard of restenosis.

Conclusions:

Ballon pulmonary valvuloplasty is a safe and effective first-line therapy in children ≤24 months, providing sustained haemodynamic improvement and durable long-term outcomes. Patients requiring predilation, larger balloon-to-annulus ratios, or having smaller pulmonary annulus Z-scores may benefit from closer long-term echocardiographic surveillance.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Patient selection and study cohort.

Figure 1

Table 1. Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, and haemodynamic characteristicsTable 1 long description.

Figure 2

Table 2. Immediate invasive haemodynamic results before and after balloon pulmonary valvuloplastyTable 2 long description.

Figure 3

Table 3. Echocardiographic findings at baseline and during follow-up after balloon pulmonary valvuloplastyTable 3 long description.

Figure 4

Table 4. Changes in tricuspid regurgitation after balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty and its association with haemodynamic and clinical outcomesTable 4 long description.

Figure 5

Table 5. Clinical follow-up and pulmonary valve reinterventionsTable 5 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 2. Longitudinal clinical outcomes after balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty in the final analytical cohort.Notes: The diagram summarises the occurrence of pulmonary regurgitation, residual pulmonary stenosis, and subsequent catheter-based or surgical reinterventions during follow-up. Percentages are calculated using the corresponding subgroup denominator. PR = pulmonary regurgitation; PVS = pulmonary valve stenosis; BPV = balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty.

Figure 7

Table 6. Kaplan–Meier estimates of freedom from time-to-event outcomesTable 6 long description.

Figure 8

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier estimates of freedom from time-to-event outcomes.Notes: Kaplan–Meier estimates of freedom from significant pulmonary restenosis (A), moderate-or-greater pulmonary regurgitation (B), pulmonary valve reintervention (C), and surgical reintervention (D) following balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals; tick marks indicate censored observations. The table below each panel displays the number of patients at risk at each time point.

Figure 9

Table 7. Univariable Cox proportional hazards analysis for predictors of time-to-event outcomesTable 7 long description.

Supplementary material: File

Davila-Ruales et al. supplementary material

Davila-Ruales et al. supplementary material
Download Davila-Ruales et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16.2 KB