Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T02:49:23.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential distribution prediction of two destructive rice weevils in China based on an ensemble model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2025

Xueping Shi
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, P. R. China
Mingli Yu
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, P. R. China
Yongli Fu
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, P. R. China
Jinyang Wang
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, P. R. China
Faliang Qin
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, P. R. China
Xingya Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, P. R. China
*
Corresponding author: Xingya Wang; Email: wangxingya20081@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rice water weevils (RWWs) (Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus) and rice weevils (RW) (Echinocnemus squameus) (both Coleoptera: Curculionidae) are major rice pests that cause significant economic losses in China. Understanding their potential distribution areas is crucial for effective management. This study used the Biomod2 package in R to simulate and predict the current and future potential distributions, changes in suitable areas, shifts in distribution centres, and overlaps under climate change for both pests under three greenhouse gas emission scenarios. By 2023, the suitable areas for RWWs and RWs were 538.52 × 104 km2 and 376.05 × 104 km2, respectively. The suitable area for the former pest expanded southwestward and northeastward across China, whereas the latter spread mainly into Northeast China. The suitable area for RWWs is projected to remain stable, whereas that for RWs is expected to decline. The distribution centroid of RWWs is anticipated to shift toward southeastern or southwestern Shaanxi, whereas RWs are likely to migrate toward central-eastern or northeastern Shaanxi. The niche overlap between the two pests is high (Schoener’s D = 0.658, I = 0.816), with overlap concentrated in central, eastern, and southern China. The key factors influencing their distributions include precipitation of the wettest month (Bio13), mean temperature of the warmest quarter (Bio10), and precipitation of the driest month (Bio14). This study provides a theoretical basis for the prediction of the potential distribution of both pests, which offers valuable insights for the development of effective pest control strategies in China.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Evaluation indices of individual prediction models for Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus and Echinocnemus squameus in China during different occurrence periods and future climate scenarios. (A: 1988–2003, B: 1988–2013, C: 1988–2023, D: SSP126, E: SSP245, F: SSP585, G: 1954–2003, H: 1954–2013, I: 1954–2023, J: SSP126, K: SSP245, l: SSP585).Notes: AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; TSS, true skill statistic.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Current geographical distributions of Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus and Echinocnemus squameus in China, as predicted via ensemble models (EMs). (A–C: Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus; D–F: Echinocnemus squameus).Notes: TA, total suitable area; MA, marginal area; SA, suitable area; OA, optimal suitable area.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Potential geographical distributions of Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus and Echinocnemus squameus in China in the 2050s, as predicted via ensemble models (EMs). (A–C: Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus; D–F: Echinocnemus squameus).Notes: TA, total suitable area; MA, marginal area; SA, suitable area; OA, optimal suitable area.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Overlapping areas between Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus (A) and Echinocnemus squameus (B) in China under current and future climates (2050s). (A: 1954–2003; B: 1954–2013; C: 1954–2023; D: SSP126; E: SSP245; F: SSP585).

Figure 4

Table 1. Overlapping area (OA) of potential geographical distribution of the Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus (A) and Echinocnemus squameus (B) under the current and future (2050s) climate conditions (unit: × 104 km2)

Figure 5

Figure 5. Migration of the centre of the potential geographical distribution of Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus (A) and Echinocnemus squameus (B). Color coding for distribution centres: Green circle: Current climate scenario (1954/1988–2003); Yellow circle: Current climate scenario (1954/1988–2013); Red circle: Current climate scenario (1954/1988–2023); Blue circle: Future climate scenario (2050s SSP126); Purple circle: Future climate scenario (2050s SSP245); Pink circle: Future climate scenario (2050s SSP585).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Ecological niches and niche similarity of Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus and Echinocnemus squameus. (A) Ecological niches under current climatic conditions. (B) Ecological niche similarity between L. Oryzophilus and E. Squameus. Color coding: red: climatic niche of L. Oryzophilus; green: climatic niche of E. Squameus; blue: niche overlap; red arrows: centroids of the realised ecological niches of each species.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Contribution of each environmental variable to Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus in the current (A) and future (B) scenarios and to Echinocnemus squameus in the current (C) and future (D) scenarios.

Supplementary material: File

Shi et al. supplementary material 1

Shi et al. supplementary material
Download Shi et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 58.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shi et al. supplementary material 2

Shi et al. supplementary material
Download Shi et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 476.5 KB