Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:34:34.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Podolian beef production on pasture and in confinement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

A. Braghieri*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni animali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
C. Pacelli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni animali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
G. De Rosa
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta, dell'Ambiente e delle Produzioni animali, Università di Napoli ‘Federico II’, Via Università 133, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy
A. Girolami
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni animali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
P. De Palo
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Zootecnia, Università di Bari, S. P. per Casamassima Km 3, 70010 Valenzano (BA), Italy
F. Napolitano
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni animali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy

Abstract

From February to August 2007 the effect of rearing system (confined (C) v. free ranging (FR)) and season (spring v. summer) was evaluated on behaviour, immune and blood parameters and beef production (experiment 1). From February to August 2008, the effect of rearing system was only evaluated on beef production (experiment 2). A total of 12 Podolian young bulls were used each year. They were slaughtered at 18 and 15 months of age in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Herbage mass and pasture composition were monitored during the 2 years. Pasture availability, in terms of herbage mass and composition, as well as its seasonal development, was similar in the 2 years. In the first experiment, FR animals spent more time walking (P < 0.05), feeding (P < 0.001) and standing (P < 0.01) and showed a lower number of agonistic (P < 0.05) and non-agonistic social interaction than C animals (P < 0.01). Significant lower concentrations of serum urea nitrogen (P < 0.001) and creatinine (P < 0.10) in FR animals indicated a lower protein nutritional status due to inadequate protein availability at pasture. As a consequence, average daily gains (P < 0.05), slaughter weight (P < 0.05) and body condition score (P < 0.01) were lower in grazing animals as compared with C bulls. Cellular immune responsiveness was higher in FR animals (P < 0.05). Similarly, antibody titre to keyhole limpet hemocyanin was higher in FR bulls at the 2nd and 3rd month after antigen injection (P < 0.05), whereas it tended to be higher at the 4th month (P < 0.10). In both experiments, grazing negatively affected meat colour in terms of lightness. Eighteen-month-old bulls also showed lower final weight, weight gain and body conditions when kept outdoor: a possible consequence of nutrient deficits, as suggested by the metabolic status of FR animals. The same animals, however, benefited from FR in terms of natural behaviour expression and immune responsiveness. When the experiment was replicated the subsequent year, on animals slaughtered at 15 months of age, no differences between the performances of FR and C animals were detected. The earlier slaughter age system was also proportionally less dependent on external inputs as grazing was not extended to the dry season when herbage mass availability was lower.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011
Figure 0

Table 1 Ingredients and chemical composition of flour offered to C and FR Podolian young bulls in both experiments (2007 and 2008)

Figure 1

Table 2 Environmental parameters recorded at pasture and in the barn throughout the behavioural observations performed in experiment 1 (2007)

Figure 2

Table 3 Botanical and chemical composition (means ± s.e.) of pasture and hand-plucked samples in experiment 1 (2007)

Figure 3

Table 4 Botanical and chemical composition (means ± s.e.) of pasture in experiment 2 (2008)

Figure 4

Table 5 Ingestive behaviour (means ± s.e.) expressed by free ranging Podolian young bulls during experiment 1 (2007)

Figure 5

Table 6 Activity budget (means ± s.e.) of Podolian young bulls expressed over 6-h periods and recorded in nine sessions during experiment 1 (2007)

Figure 6

Table 7 Other activities (means ± s.e.) of Podolian young bulls observed over 6-h periods and recorded in nine sessions during experiment 1 (2007)

Figure 7

Figure 1 Antibody titres to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) of confined (C) and free range (FR) Podolian young bulls were evaluated before the first antigen administration and then at 30-day intervals using ELISA techniques. Group FR had a humoral immune response constantly higher than group C, with significant differences 2 and 3 months after antigen injection (P < 0.05), whereas differences only tended to be significant at 3 months (P < 0.10) and were not significant at 4 and 5 months.

Figure 8

Table 8 Blood metabolites (means ± s.e.) of C and FR Podolian young bulls in experiment 1 (2007)

Figure 9

Table 9 Performance infra vitam and post-slaughter measurements (means ± s.e.) of Podolian young bulls in experiment 1 (2007)

Figure 10

Table 10 Performance infra vitam and post-slaughter measurements (means ± s.e.) of Podolian young bulls in experiment 2 (2008)