Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T01:00:17.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of polyurethanes synthesized with castor oil polyols for biomedical devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2019

Yomaira L. Uscátegui
Affiliation:
Doctoral Program in Bioscience, Research Group on Energy, Materials and Environment, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca 53753, Colombia
Luis E. Díaz
Affiliation:
Research Group on Bioprospecting, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca 53753, Colombia
Manuel F. Valero*
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Program, Research Group on Energy, Materials and Environment, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca 53753, Colombia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: manuelvv@unisabana.edu.co

Abstract

Polyurethanes (PUs) were synthesized with polyols derived from castor oil and isophorone diisocyanate. The materials were evaluated for their mechanical properties using stress–strain curves, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and contact angle analysis. The biological response of the materials was evaluated by determining their cell viability in vitro, antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and biological response in vivo of PUs by means of implanting them in Wistar rats. The cell proliferation on the materials was analyzed using mouse fibroblast L929, human fibroblast MRC-5, and adult human dermal fibroblast (HDFa) cells by the ISO 10993-5 method. The materials showed no toxic effects and promoted cell proliferation. Experiments performed in vivo for 30 days in mice showed that the materials neither affected the wound healing process nor caused adverse effects or severe injuries in the dorsal mid-cervical tissue or organs on histological evaluation. PUs synthesized can be used in biomedical devices.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

TABLE I: Mechanical properties of PUs.

Figure 1

Figure 1: TGs of the synthesized PUs. (a) TG curves of PUs. (b) DTG curves of PUs.

Figure 2

Figure 2: PU contact angles. Notes: The contact angle is presented as the mean ± SD (n = 10). Bars with equal letters (a) do not differ between polyols (P > 0.05).

Figure 3

Figure 3: Cell viability at 24 h. (a) L929 mouse fibroblasts, (b) MRC-5 human fibroblasts, and (c) HDFa cells. Notes: Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Bars with different letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences between polyols (P < 0.05).

Figure 4

TABLE II: Bacterial inhibition of PUs.

Figure 5

Figure 4: Tissue images of three of the groups of mice at day 30 of the experiment. (a) Skin with the CO-SM material, (b) skin with the CO-M2 material, and (c) skin with the PP material.

Figure 6

TABLE III: Lesion score percentages from histopathological diagnoses.

Figure 7

Figure 5: Classification of the lesions presented in the histopathological analysis of the animals. Note: The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5) and correspond to the scores by two different pathologists.

Figure 8

Figure 6: Macroscopic description of lesions presented in animals. (a) Slight thickening of the epidermis (arrow) and moderate pyogranulomatous dermatitis in response to the foreign body (asterisk) composed of CO-M2 material (H&E 20× stain). (b) Moderate pyogranulomatous dermatitis in response to the foreign body composed of CO-M2 material (arrow), with the presence of epithelioid cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, plasma cells, PMN-eosinophils, and neutrophils (asterisk) (H&E 200× stain). (c) Mild multifocal lymphohistiocytic dermatitis associated with the adnexa and adipose tissue (arrows) with PP commercial material (H&E 80× stain).