Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:40:57.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hardening and crystallization in monatomic metallic glass during elastic cycling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2015

Ronggen Cao
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Yun Deng*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
Chuang Deng*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 5V6, Canada
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: dengc@ad.umanitoba.ca

Abstract

While conventional metallic glass (MG) is usually an alloy that contains at least two types of different elements, monatomic metallic glass (MMG) in body-centered cubic metals has recently been vitrified experimentally through ultrafast quenching. In this research, MMG in Ta was vitrified by molecular dynamics simulations and used as a model system to explore the atomistic mechanism of hardening in MG under cyclic loading well below the yield point. It was found that significant structural ordering was caused during the elastic cycling without accumulating apparent plastic strain, which ultimately led to the crystallization of MG that has been long conjectured but rarely directly proved before. It was also revealed that tensile stresses were more likely to induce structural ordering and crystallization in MG than compressive stresses.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Atomistic configuration of the as-quenched Ta sample at 300 K. (b) RDF of the crystalline and as-quenched Ta samples at 300 K. (c) Evolution of the atomic volume of Ta during the quenching and reheating at different rates. The atoms in (a) were colored according to CNA.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. (a) Atomistic configuration of the Ta MMG with free surfaces in the x-direction under cyclic loading. (b) The stress versus time during the cyclic loading. (c) The stress versus strain during the cyclic loading. (d) The stress–strain curves of the pre-cycled Ta MMG samples during monotonic tensile loading. The inset indicates the change of the maximum tensile strength due to the elastic cycling. (e) The average tensile stress between 4.25 and 5.5% tensile strain as a function of the number of elastic cycles. The atoms in (a) were colored according to CNA.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. The atomistic configuration of Ta MMG samples with (a) free boundaries and a crack, (c) free boundaries, and (e) periodic boundaries in x-direction. The inset in (a), (c), and (e) shows the corresponding stress evolution during the cycling in each Ta MMG sample. (b), (d), and (f) show the formation of a nanocrystal due to the cycling in each Ta MMG sample, as indicated by the arrow. The atoms were colored according to CNA.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. The evolution of the average atomic energy in Ta MMG samples with different cycling amplitudes. The inset shows the zoomed view between 0.8 and 1.2 ns.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. The stress versus (a) time and (b) strain during the elastic cycling of the Ta-SPP sample at T = 300 K. The atomistic configuration showing the formation of nanocrystals in (c) Ta-SPP sample at T = 300 K and (d) Ta-SPP-crack sample at T = 50 K during the elastic cycling. The atoms in (c) and (d) were colored by CNA.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. The RDF of (a) Cu and (b) Ta at different temperatures during the rapid quenching.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. The evolution of atomic volume during the rapid quenching of liquid Cu at different rates. The circular region shows the nucleated nanocrystal in the sample quenched at the rate of 1.7 K/ps. The atoms were colored according to CNA and noncrystalline atoms have been removed for clarity.