Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:58:57.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical and functional responses of intestinal helminths in three rajid skates: evidence for competition between parasites?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2012

HASEEB S. RANDHAWA*
Affiliation:
Ecology Degree Programme, Department of Botany, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand9054
*
*Corresponding author: Tel: +64 3 471 6146. E-mail: haseeb.randhawa@otago.ac.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Host-parasite interactions generally involve communities of parasites. Within these communities, species will co-exist and/or interact with one another in a manner either benefiting the species involved or to the detriment of one or more of the species. At the level of helminth infracommunities, evidence for intra- and inter-specific competition includes numerical responses, i.e. those regulating helminth intensity of infection, and functional responses, i.e. where the presence of competitors modifies the realised niche of infrapopulations. The objectives of this study are to assess the numerical and functional responses of helminths in infracommunities from 3 rajid skates using general linear models. Despite a lack of numerical responses, functional responses to intra- and inter-specific interactions were observed. A positive correlation between the number of individuals in an infrapopulation and its niche breadth (functional response) was observed for the tapeworms Pseudanthobothrium spp. and Echeneibothrium spp., in all their respective hosts, and for the nematode Pseudanisakis sp. in the little skate. Evidence for inter-specific competition includes niche shifts in Pseudanthobothrium purtoni (ex little skate) and Pseudanisakis sp. (ex thorny skate) in the presence of Pseudanisakis sp. and the tapeworm Grillotia sp., respectively. These results are consistent with other studies in providing evidence for competition between helminths of skates.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of the host distribution, prevalence, intensity of infection, average site of attachment, and niche breadth for helminths included in this study

(BF, Bay of Fundy; N, Nematoda; NS, North Sea; R, Rhinebothriidea; T, Tetraphyllidea; Tr, Trypanorhyncha.)
Figure 1

Table 2. Predictor variable relative importance weights [w+(i)], ranks, weighted model average parameter estimates, and 95% confidence interval for Niche breadth and Average position

(Parameter estimates in bold indicate those bounded away from ‘0’.)
Figure 2

Fig. 1. Relationships between niche breadth and the abundance of helminths in the little skate (Leucoraja erinacea): (a) Pseudanthobothrium purtoni, (b) Echeneibothrium vernetae (intensity of infection for E. vernetae), and (c) E. vernetae (abundance of P. purtoni). The lines represent the best fit from simple linear regressions: (a) r = 0·6461, P < 0·0001; (b) r = 0·3859, P < 0·0001; and (c) r = 0·2137, P = 0·0135.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of the average position (whorl number) of Pseudanthobothrium purtoni infecting the little skate (Leucoraja erinacea) in the presence (open bars) or absence (full bars) of the nematode Pseudanisakis sp., expressed as the proportion (percentage) of the infrapopulations occupying each whorl. The preferred site of attachment of Pseudanisakis sp. is whorl 4.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Relationships between the intensity of infection of helminths and their niche breadth in the thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata): (a) Pseudanthobothrium hanseni and (b) Echeneibothrium dubium abyssorum. The lines represent the best fit from simple linear regressions: (a) r = 0·5148, P < 0·0001 and (b) r = 0·7524, P = 0·0012.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Relationship between the average position (whorl number) of Echeneibothrium dubium abyssorum infrapopulations in the thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) and host total length (cm). The line represents the best fit from a simple linear regression: r = 0·5782, P = 0·0240).