Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T08:48:38.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface-area changes of glaciers in the Tibetan Plateau interior area since the 1970s using recent Landsat images and historical maps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Wei Junfeng
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute (CAREERI), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China E-mail: liusy@lzb.ac.cn University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Liu Shiyin
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute (CAREERI), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China E-mail: liusy@lzb.ac.cn
Guo Wanqin
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute (CAREERI), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China E-mail: liusy@lzb.ac.cn
Yao Xiaojun
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute (CAREERI), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China E-mail: liusy@lzb.ac.cn University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Geography and Environment College, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China
Xu Junli
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute (CAREERI), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China E-mail: liusy@lzb.ac.cn University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Bao Weijia
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute (CAREERI), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China E-mail: liusy@lzb.ac.cn University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Jiang Zongli
Affiliation:
Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Clean-Utilization and Mine Environment Protection, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Tibetan Plateau interior area (TPIA), often termed the Qangtang Plateau, is distinguished by many dome-like mountains higher than 6000 ma.s.l. These mountains provide favourable conditions for the development of ice caps and glaciers of extreme continental/subpolar type. According to historical topographic maps (1959–80) and recent Landsat images (2004–11), continuous retreat was observed and the glacierized part of this area decreased by 9.5% (0.27% a–1) with respect to the total glacier area of 8036.4 km2 in the 1970s. Glaciers in the Zhari Namco basin have experienced the highest area shrinkage, with a reduction rate of 0.72% a–1, while the smallest reduction occurred in Bangong Co (0.12% a–1) and Dogai Coying basins (0.11% a–1). A regional gradient of area loss was found, with a larger decrease in the south and a smaller decrease in the north of the plateau. Comparisons indicate glaciers have experienced smaller shrinkage in the TPIA than in surrounding regions. Glacier shrinkage in the TPIA is mainly attributed to an increase in air temperature, while precipitation, glacier size and positive difference of glaciation also played an important role.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2014
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sketch of the study area. The mountains are (1) Caixiong Kangri; (2) Kunlun peak; (3) Tuze Kangri; (4) Songzhiling; (5) Muz Tag peak; (6) Burog Kangri; (7) Zangser Kangri; (8) Kangzhag Ri; (9) Jinyang Kangri; (10) Buka Daban peak; (11) Malan ice cap; (12) Geladaindong peak; (13) Puruog Kangri; (14) Xiyaergang; (15) Mayi Kangri; (16) Duguer; (17) Mugagebo; (18) Qingpagonglong; (19) Xiakangjian; (20) Longger; (21) Kangrinboqe peak; (22) Loinbo Kangri; (23) Bobogawu; (24) Shenzhajiegang; (25) Nyainqentanglha peak.

Figure 1

Table 1. Major datasets used in this study

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Glacier outline mapping. The yellow and white outlines are the results of this study, extracted from CTMs and Landsat separately; the red outline is from the Randolph Glacier Inventory v3.2 (Arendt and others, 2012). The backgrounds are Landsat images.

Figure 3

Table 2. Glacier state and changes in drainage basins during 1970s–2009

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Glacier state and changes in sub-regions during 1970s–2009.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Hypsography of glaciers in drainage basins and sub-regions. The three black lines in each panel depict values of Hmax (up), Hmed (middle) and Hmin (down), respectively.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Characteristics of glacier slope and aspect. (a) Mean slope of glacier number/area (left panel); each bar represents a slope interval of 1° and area <10km2 (right panel). (b) Mean aspect of glacier number (left panel) and area (right panel); each sector represents an aspect interval of 45°.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Glacier characteristics according to area-size classes. (a) Glacier numbers and areas in 1970s and 2009; (b) relative area changes for glaciers with area <10km2.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Advancing glaciers occurring in Kunlun mountains. The yellow and white outlines are the results of this study, extracted from CTMs and Landsat separately; the red outline is from the Randolph Glacier Inventory v3.2 (Arendt and others, 2012).

Figure 9

Table 3. Changes in Hmin of drainage basins and sub-regions

Figure 10

Table 4. Glacier reduction in the TP and surrounding regions

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Lake level change rates in the period 2003–09 (based on Zhang and others, 2011), with glaciers in blue.