Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:52:53.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Petrogenesis and metallogenic potential of the Wulanba granite, southern Great Xing’an Range, NE China: constraints from whole-rock and apatite geochemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2019

Yuan Liu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing102249, China MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Si-Hong Jiang*
Affiliation:
MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Leon Bagas
Affiliation:
MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China Centre for Exploration Targeting, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA6009, Australia
Chun-Liang Chen
Affiliation:
MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Ning Han
Affiliation:
MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing100037, China
Yun-Yang Wan*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing102249, China
*
Author for correspondence: Si-Hong Jiang and Yun-Yang Wan, Emails: jiangsihong1@163.com and wanyunyang@cup.edu.cn
Author for correspondence: Si-Hong Jiang and Yun-Yang Wan, Emails: jiangsihong1@163.com and wanyunyang@cup.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Wulanba granite, consisting of biotite monzogranite and syenogranite, is located in the southern part of the Great Xing’an Range, NE China. Whole-rock major- and trace-element geochemistry suggests the Wulanba granite is a high-K–shoshonitic, slightly peraluminous and highly differentiated I-type granite. The Sr–Nd–Hf isotopes indicate that it originated from partial melting of juvenile crust derived from the depleted mantle with a minor input of old crust. The relatively young T2DM and tDM2 ages indicate it was most likely derived from a Late Neoproterozoic to Early Palaeozoic source. We have demonstrated that the biotite monzogranite is the ore-related intrusion of the Haobugao Zn–Fe mineralization based on the following geological, geochronological and geochemical evidence: (1) the chalcopyrite/pyrite in the biotite monzogranite and the continuous mineralization of drill core ZK2508; (2) the consistence of the emplacement age of the biotite monzogranite (~141–140/138 Ma) with the skarn mineralization age (~142 Ma); and (3) the presence of rich ore-forming elements (Fe–Zn–Cu) in the biotite monzogranite, and the similar Pb compositions of the sulfides from the Haobugao deposit and the biotite monzogranite. Compared to the barren syenogranite, the fertile biotite monzogranite is more oxidized, while the edges of the apatite grains in the biotite monzogranite are more oxidized than the centres. The average F/Cl ratio of the fertile biotite monzogranite (~123.45) is much higher than that of the barren syenogranite (~73.98). We conclude that these differences reflect unique geochemical signatures, and the geochemical composition of the apatite can be used to infer the economic potential of granites.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Simplified geological map showing the location of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt; and (b) geological map of the Great Xing’an Range and its adjacent areas (modified after Liu et al.2017).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Geological map of (a) the Huanggangliang–Ganzhu’ermiao metallogenic belt in the southern part of the Great Xing’an Range; (b) the Wulanba granite and its adjacent areas; and (c) the Haobugao Zn–Fe deposit  (modified after Liu et al.2017).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Photographs and photomicrographs of (a) the biotite monzogranite, 877.30 m, drill core ZK2505 (sample HL14-46); (b) biotite monzogranite with sulfides and chlorite alteration (sample HL14-44); (c) biotite monzogranite containing K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz and biotite (plane-polarized light); (d) sulfides and chlorite alteration in the biotite monzogranite (plane-polarized light); (e) pyrite and chalcopyrite mineralization in the biotite monzogranite (sample HL14-3); (f) the medium- to coarse-grained syenogranite (sample HL13-17); (g) pyrite and chalcopyrite mineralization in the biotite monzogranite (reflected light); and (h) syenogranite containing K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz and partly chloritized biotite (cross-polarized light). Abbreviations of minerals: Qtz – quartz; Kfs – K-feldspar; Chl – chlorite; Pl – plagioclase; Bi – biotite; Py – pyrite; Ccp – chalcopyrite.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a–f) Zircon and (g) apatite U–Pb concordia diagrams.

Figure 4

Fig. 6. Cathodoluminescence images of representative apatite grains from the Wulanba granite. Red numbers represent logfO2 values.

Figure 5

Table 1. Major- and trace-element compositions of the Wulanba granite

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Trace-element plots for the Wulanba granite and apatite. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns (after Taylor & McLennan, 1985); and (b) primitive mantle-normalized spider diagrams (after Sun & McDonough, 1989).

Figure 7

Table 2. EMPA major-element compositions of apatite grains from the Wulanba granite

Figure 8

Fig. 7. (a–c) Correlation between the major-element compositions of the apatite and the whole-rock SiO2 contents; (d) plot of MnO versus SiO2, the magmatic and hydrothermal apatite fields are from Chen et al. (2017); (e) plot of U versus Th for apatite; and (f) plot of Hf versus Zr for apatite.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Histograms of the εHf(t) and tDM2 values of (a, b) the biotite monzogranite; and (c, d) the syenogranite.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Initial ϵHf isotopic values versus the U–Pb ages of the zircon grains from the Wulanba granite. Data for the Early Cretaceous igneous rocks and Middle to Late Jurassic granites are from Ouyang et al. (2015 and references therein). Abbreviations: DM – depleted mantle; CHUR – chondritic uniform reservoir.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. (a) 104*Ga/Al versus (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) discrimination diagram; (b) (Na2O + K2O)/CaO versus (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) discrimination diagram; and (c) TiO2 versus Zr discrimination diagram. A – A-type granite; FG – fractionated I-, S- and M-type granites; OGT – unfractionated I-, S- and M-type granites. The base diagrams for figures (a) and (b) are from Whalen et al. (1987).

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Samples from drill core ZK2508 (∼1000 m) containing biotite monzogranite → mineralized garnet skarn → mineralized tuffaceous slate → mineralized slate from deep to shallow, demonstrating that the biotite granite is the ore-related intrusion.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Lead isotope compositions of the Wulanba granite and sulfides (base map modified after Ouyang et al.2015). Data for the mantle, orogen, and lower and upper crust evolution curves are from Zartman & Doe (1981), data for the Mesozoic intrusive rocks in the SGXR are from Zhao & Zhang (1997), Chu et al. (2001), Xiao et al. (2004), Zhu et al. (2006), Guo et al. (2010) and Jiang et al. (2010), and data for the sulfide minerals in the SGXR are from Ouyang et al. (2015 and references therein).

Figure 14

Fig. 13. (a) Plot of logfO2 versus T (°C) for the Wulanba granite. In this study, the logfO2 values were calculated using the method of Miles et al. (2014) and the temperature is the TZr. The oxygen fugacity buffer data are from Eugster & Wones (1962). MH – magnetite–haematite buffer; NNO – NiNiO; FMQ – fayalite–magnetite–quartz buffer; WM – wustite–magnetite; IW – iron–wustite buffer; IQF – iron–quartz–fayalite. (b) Plot of whole-rock SiO2 (wt %) versus logfO2; (c) F/Cl of the magma versus whole-rock SiO2 (wt %); and (d) plot of F (wt %) versus Cl (wt %) for the apatite. The data for the skarn Cu–Zn–Pb deposits and porphyry Cu deposits are from Zhong et al. (2018).

Supplementary material: File

Liu et al. supplementary material

Liu et al. supplementary material 1

Download Liu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 24.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Liu et al. supplementary material

Liu et al. supplementary material 2

Download Liu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 51.2 KB