Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:46:36.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mitochondria during sea urchin oogenesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2017

Maria Agnello*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, Palermo 90128, Italy.
Maria Carmela Roccheri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni Morici
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Anna Maria Rinaldi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
*
All correspondence to: Maria Agnello. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 16, Palermo 90128, Italy. Tel: +39 091 238 97 419. Fax: +39 091 65 77 210. E-mail: maria.agnello@unipa.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sea urchin represents an ideal model for studies on fertilization and early development, but the achievement of egg competence and mitochondrial behaviour during oogenesis remain to be enlightened. Oocytes of echinoid, such as sea urchin, unlike other echinoderms and other systems, complete meiotic maturation before fertilization. Mitochondria, the powerhouse of eukaryotic cells, contain a multi-copy of the maternally inherited genome, and are involved directly at several levels in the reproductive processes, as their functional status influences the quality of oocytes and contributes to fertilization and embryogenesis. In the present paper, we report our latest data on mitochondrial distribution, content and activity during Paracentrotus lividus oogenesis. The analyses were carried out using confocal microscopy, in vivo incubating oocytes at different maturation stages with specific probes for mitochondria and mtDNA, and by immunodetection of Hsp56, a well known mitochondrial marker. Results show a parallel rise of mitochondrial mass and activity, and, especially in the larger oocytes, close to germinal vesicle (GV) breakdown, a considerable increase in organelle activity around the GV, undoubtedly for an energetic aim. In the mature eggs, mitochondrial activity decreases, in agreement with their basal metabolism. Further and significant information was achieved by studying the mitochondrial chaperonin Hsp56 and mtDNA. Results show a high increase of both Hsp56 and mtDNA. Taken together these results demonstrate that during oogenesis a parallel rise of different mitochondrial parameters, such as mass, activity, Hsp56 and mtDNA occurs, highlighting important tools in the establishment of developmental competence.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1 In vivo incubation with MTG and MTO: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes, at different sizes, and mature eggs, captured by CLSM. In green: the mitochondria population stained with MTG. In red: active mitochondria stained with MTO. Bottom: merge of green and red fluorescence. (a1–a3): 20 µm oocytes; (b1–b3): 30 µm oocytes; (c1–c3): 40 µm oocytes; (d1–d3): 60 µm oocytes; (e1–e3): 80 µm oocytes; (f1–f3): 90 µm oocytes; (g1–g3): 90 µm mature egg; (h1, h2): negative controls after oligomycin incubation; (h3): merge of MTG and MTO signals in the zygote, 20 min after fertilization. Bar represents 50 µm.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Quantification of fluorescence signals, after incubation of oocytes and eggs with MTG and MTO. In the abscissa (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs respectively. Ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Quantification of fluorescent signals after incubation with MTG and MTO: equatorial optical sections of a representative oocyte captured by CLSM. (A, B) Green and red signals in grey scale. (C) Merge of green and red fluorescence in RGB colours; in the bottom correspondent plot profiles. Abscissa: distance, measured in inches, along the diameter of oocyte; ordinate: intensity values of incorporated fluorescent probes in different areas of an equatorial optical section of the 90 µm oocyte, measured as arbitrary units. Bar represents 50 µm.

Figure 3

Figure 4 In situ detection of fluorescent signals after PicoGreen dsDNA incubation: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes and eggs, captured by CLSM. (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs, respectively; i: control after incubation with DNase. Bar represents 50 µm. Graph: quantification of intensity values for mtDNA fluorescence, results obtained by subtracting, through Image J software, the nuclear fluorescence. (a−h) In the abscissa: same samples showed in the images; ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.

Figure 4

Figure 5 In situ detection of Hsp56 after immunofluorescence with the antibody anti-hsp60: equatorial optical sections of representative oocytes and eggs, captured by CLSM. (a−h): 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 90 µm oocytes, 90 µm mature and fertilized eggs, respectively. (i): Negative control in which the primary antibody was omitted. Bar represents 50 µm. Graph: quantification of intensity values for Hsp56. (a−h) In the abscissa: same samples showed in the images; ordinate: intensity values, referred to as arbitrary units. Data were reported as a mean of triplicate experiments.