Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:40:29.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Serve or Conserve: Mission, Strategy, and Multi-Level Nonprofit Change During the Great Recession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Aaron Horvath Open the ORCID record for Aaron Horvath [Opens in a new window] ,
Christof Brandtner  and
Walter W. Powell
Aaron Horvath*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Christof Brandtner
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Walter W. Powell
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
*
ahorvath@stanford.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Change is frequently afoot in the nonprofit sector, both in the wider institutional environment in which nonprofits operate and within the organizations themselves. Environmental transformations—funding sources, supply and demand for collective goods, and administrative norms—create the circumstances in which organizations operate. Internally, change involves the alteration of goals, practices, and personnel. To explore how multiple aspects of change intersect across levels, we ask how organizations’ practices influence their experience of and reaction to changes in the environment. Turning open systems theories inside out, we argue that internal planning, routines, and missions give rise to organizational mindsets that imbue evolving environmental circumstances with meaning. We illustrate our argument using a unique longitudinal dataset of 196 representative 501(c)(3) public charities in the San Francisco Bay Area from 2005 to 2015 to assess both accelerators and obstacles of change. Empirically, we investigate predictors of organizational insolvency and the ability to serve constituents in the wake of the Great Recession. We find that strategic planning decreases the likelihood of insolvency whereas an orientation toward the needy increases spending. We conclude with our contributions to understanding of multi-level organizational change and nonprofit strategy.

Keywords

Organizational changeGreat RecessionStrategic outlookPoverty mindsetInsolvencyResilience

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Volume 29 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 976 - 993
Copyright
Copyright © International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allison, G. T. (1969). Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 689–718. doi: 10.2307/1954423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backman, E. V., & Rathgeb-Smith, S. (2000). Healthy organizations, unhealthy communities?. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(4), 355–373. doi: 10.1002/nml.10402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandtner, C., Horvath, A., & Powell, W. W. (2017). From iron cage to glass house: Rationalization, receptivity, and intercalation in the nonprofit sector, 2005–2015. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Brest, P., & Harvey, H. (2008). Money well spent: A strategic plan for smart philanthropy. New York: Bloomberg Press.Google Scholar
Bromley, P., Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2012). Decoupling revisited: Common Pressures, divergent strategies in the U.S. nonprofit sector. Management (France), 15(5), 468–501.Google Scholar
Brown, M. S., McKeever, B., Dietz, N., Koulish, J., & Pollak, T. (2013). The impact of the Great Recession on the number of charities. Washington: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavisrock.Google Scholar
Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2012). Build, borrow, or buy: Solving the growth dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, D. A., & Stater, K. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 947–966. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mun025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167–199. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. (2010). Wither the turn? The ambiguous nature of nonprofits’ commercial revenue. Social Forces, 89(1), 145–161. doi: 10.1353/sof.2010.0058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28(5), 773–786. doi: 10.1177/0170840606077620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1992). A summary of basic concepts. In A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.) (pp. 114–27). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 28, 21–42. doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000028006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?. Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency?. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. doi: 10.1086/231294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. doi: 10.2307/3556620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D. P. (1998). Measuring the unmeasurable: Empirical Studies of nonprofit organization effectiveness from 1977 to 1997. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(2), 183–202. doi: 10.1177/0899764098272005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 96–116. doi: 10.2307/2657291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268. doi: 10.1177/0899764099283002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press doi: 10.4159/9780674037403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangl, M. (2010). Causal inference in sociological research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 21–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74. doi: 10.1177/0003122409357044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674038288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organization. In Powell, W. W. (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, H., & Bromley, T. (2015). Internal and external determinants of formal plans in the nonprofit sector. International Public Management Journal, 18(4), 568–588. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2015.1038671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, L., & Kelly, N. J. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14(2), 186–205. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpj006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1998). How affirmative action became diversity management employer response to antidiscrimination law, 1961 to 1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(7), 960–984. doi: 10.1177/0002764298041007008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecy, J. D., Schmitz, H. P., & Swedlund, H. (2012). Non-governmental and not-for-profit organizational effectiveness: A modern synthesis. Voluntas, 23(2), 434–457. doi: 10.1007/s11266-011-9204-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubove, R. (1965). The professional altruist: The emergence of social work as a career, 1880–1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674420939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2011). Managerialism and beyond: Discourses of civil society organization and their governance implications. Voluntas, 22(4), 731–754. doi: 10.1007/s11266-011-9202-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86. doi: 10.1177/0899764014561796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 563–577. doi: 10.2307/2392340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messinger, S. L. (1955). Organizational transformation: A case study of a declining social movement. American Sociological Review, 20(1), 3–10. doi: 10.2307/2088192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340. doi: 10.1086/226550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., & Simsa, R. (2013). Entwicklungsperspektiven des Nonprofit-Sektors. In Simsa, R., Meyer, M., & Badelt, C. (Eds.), Handbuch der Nonprofit-Organisation (3rd ed.). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
Minkoff, D. C., & Powell, W. W. (2006). Nonprofit mission: Constancy, responsiveness, or deflection?. In Powell, W. W., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrang, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mohr, J. (1994). Soldiers, mothers, tramps, and others: Discourse roles in the 1907 New York City charity directory. Poetics, 22(4), 327–357. doi: 10.1016/0304-422X(94)90013-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. doi: 10.5465/19416520802211644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oster, S. M. (1995). Strategic management for nonprofit organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195085037.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peek, J., & Rosengren, E. S. (2000). Collateral damage: Effects of the Japanese bank crisis on real activity in the United States. American Economic Review, 90(1), 30–45. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.1.30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 194–208. doi: 10.2307/2091811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Rerup, C., et al. (2017). Opening the black box: The microfoundations of institutions. In Greenwood, R., et al. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132–1205. doi: 10.1086/421508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rangan, V. K. (2004). Lofty missions, down-to-earth plans. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 112–119.Google ScholarPubMed
Rerup, C., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577–610. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.61968107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L., et al. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In Greenwood, R., et al. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sills, D. L. (1957). The volunteers, means and ends in a national organization. North Stratford, NH: Ayer Publishers.Google Scholar
Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & Meinhard, A. G. (1991). Institutional change and ecological dynamics. In Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In March, J. P. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, V. (1989). Social movement continuity: The Women’s Movement in Abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 761–775. doi: 10.2307/2117752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. In Roth, G. & Wittich, C. (Eds.), Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1639–1660. doi: 10.1177/0170840606068343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, K., & Waeger, D. (2017). Organizations as polities: An open systems perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 886–918. doi: 10.5465/annals.2015.0152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K.E. (1993). “The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster.” Administrative Science Quarterly 628–52.10.2307/2393339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in and age of uncertainty (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674045064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). To profit or not to profit. New York: Cambridge University Press doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511625947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, J., Boenigk, S., & Jegers, M. (2014). Seven trade-offs in measuring nonprofit performance and effectiveness. Voluntas, 25(6), 1648–1670. doi: 10.1007/s11266-014-9446-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., & Aldrich, H. E. (2013). More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 441–488. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2013.781862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zald, M. N., & Denton, P. (1963). From evangelism to general service: The transformation of the YMCA. American Journal of Sociology, 8(2), 214–234.Google Scholar