Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T22:09:52.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collective trauma: the case for a multilevel social-ecological perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

D Somasundaram
D Somasundaram*
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Abstracts from ‘Brainwaves’— The Australasian Society for Psychiatric Research Annual Meeting 2006, 6–8 December, Sydney, Australia
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2006, pp. 270 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

Background:

Complex emergencies that follow war and natural disasters have an impact on not only the individual but also on the family, community and society. Just as the mental health effects on the individual psyche can result in nonpathological distress as well as a variety of psychiatric disorders, massive and widespread trauma and loss can impact on family and social processes as well as the collective unconscious causing changes at the family, community and societal levels.

Methods:

This ecological study used qualitative methods of Participatory Action Research in Cambodia and Northern Sri Lanka, while involved in community mental health programmes among the Tamil and Khmer communities. Participant observation, key informant interviews and focus group discussion with community relief and rehabilitation workers and officials were used.

Results:

Fundamental changes in the functioning of the family and the community included the dynamics of single-headed families, lack of trust among members, and changes in significant relationships (mother-child), and childrearing practices. Communities were more dependent, passive, silent, without leadership, mistrustful and suspicious. Additional adverse effects included the breakdown in traditional structures, institutions and familiar ways of life, and deterioration in social norms and ethics. On the positive side, the study observed the emergence of community organizations, enhanced female role and leadership, and a decrease in suicide rates.

Conclusions:

Exposure to conflict, war and disaster impact on family and community dynamics resulting in changes at a collective level. Relief, rehabilitation and development programmes will need to use integrated multilevel approaches.