Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:35:20.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural and tribological characterization of Ti–In–N films deposited by magnetron sputter deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2011

Margaret A. Nowicki
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire
James E. Krzanowski*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire
Jose L. Endrino
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: jamesk@cisunix.unh.edu

Abstract

TiN–indium composite films were deposited by simultaneous sputtering of titanium and indium in a mixed Argon/Nitrogen atmosphere and characterized for tribological applications. Film compositions showed a nonlinear behavior as a function of sputter gun power. For films deposited at −50 V bias, and containing less than 29 relative percent indium, the films had a face centered cubic structure, but at higher indium contents (63–82%) the structure was not consistent with either TiN or indium. At −150 V bias, the films had either the TiN structure, In-type structure, or a mixture of the two. Atomic force microscopy images showed the formation of semispherical drops on the surface of the samples deposited at −50 V bias voltage, whereas at −150 V bias voltage the samples exhibited a smooth coating surface with occasional ellipsoidal blisters. Nanoindentation test of the films shows low hardness (5–12 GPa), but tribological testing showed that frictional behavior can be improved by moderate heating before testing, suggesting indium segregation to the surface.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Relative indium concentration versus indium sputter gun power for films deposited at −50 and −150 V substrate bias. The curves show a highly nonlinear relationship between indium concentration and gun power, and also demonstrate a lower indium content in films deposited at the higher bias.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Scanning electron microscope images for films (a) 180-50/150 (29.3% In) and (b) 180-90/150 (79% In). A smooth surface is obtained at the lower indium content but at the higher indium content the film surface appeared very rough.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Atomic force microscopy morphological and phase-contrast images for films (a, b) 180-50/50 (63.1% In) and (d, e) 180-50/150 (29.3% In). (c) Topographical section of line scan shown in Fig 3(a). (f) Topographical section of line scan shown in Fig 3(d).

Figure 3

TABLE I. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of selected samples.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. X-ray diffraction scans for films deposited at −50 V bias. The line positions for TiN (ο) and In (⋄) are shown. For films with 29% indium and below, the peak positions are generally consistent with the rocksalt–TiN structure.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) scans for films deposited at −150 V bias with line positions shown for TiN (ο) and In (⋄). Films with lower indium content show structures similar to TiN, but at higher indium content the hexagonal indium structure dominates.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. XRD scans for films deposited under identical conditions (180 W Ti, 45 W In, and substrate bias of −50 V) but different times. The upper curve is for a film deposited for 90 min, whereas lower scan shows results for a film deposited for 45 min.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. Sample friction coefficient traces for sample 180-40/50 in the as-deposited state (upper curve) and after heating for 10 min at 100 °C and an additional 15 min at 250 °C. In the as-deposited state, the film quickly wears through and gives friction coefficients in the 0.6–0.7 range for the remainder of the test, but after heating a lower friction coefficient is obtained.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. (a) Average friction coefficients for all samples (averaged over all data) for films deposited at −50 V bias and (b) for films deposited at −150 V bias. Separate curves are shown for the as-deposited state, after heating for 10 min at 100 °C, and then an additional 15 min at 250 °C. Films with lower indium contents generally showed reductions in friction coefficients, whereas at higher indium contents little improvement was obtained.

Figure 9

TABLE II. XPS analysis of selected samples subjected to thermal treatments.