Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T22:56:57.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Complex ages of five colour and morphology populations of zircon from the Jabal Radwa alkali granite, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2025

John N. Aleinikoff*
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
Douglas B. Stoeser
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
Edward A. du Bray
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
Christopher Holm-Denoma
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
Heather Lowers
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
Jay Thompson
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
*
Corresponding author: J.N. Aleinikoff; Email: aleinikoffjohn@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Jabal Radwa pluton (referred to here as the Radwa alkali granite), northwestern Arabian Shield, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, is a near-circular exposure of peralkaline granite. Previous TIMS U–Pb age determinations of multigrain zircon fractions suggested an age of ∼480 Ma, at least 100 m.y. younger than the youngest known rocks of the Arabian Shield.

A single sample of the Radwa alkali granite contains dark brown, green, blue, tan and yellow colour populations of zircon, plus yellow titanite. The ages of dark brown zircon were unobtainable by SHRIMP due to large matrix effects caused by high concentrations of REE and other trace elements. Green and blue zircon grains were determined to be ∼518 Ma. Tan zircon forms prismatic crystals that resemble those typical of igneous zircon. Three analytical investigations for tan zircon resulted in a SHRIMP age of 501.3 ± 3.9 and LA-ICP-MS ages of 506.7 ± 7.8 and 501.2 ± 5.4 Ma, confirming the uncharacteristically young age of this granite. Yellow zircon yielded a LA-ICP-MS age of 493 ± 13 Ma. Dark brown, green and blue zircon are considered to be xenocrysts, whereas tan and yellow zircon are igneous in origin.

REE distribution patterns define two groups of zircon. Group 1 is composed of tan, yellow and dark brown zircon that have HREE-enriched patterns typical of igneous zircon. Group 2 is composed of green and blue zircon that have essentially horizontal REE patterns typical of hydrothermal zircon.

Because essentially all Proterozoic magmatism in the Arabian Shield ended by ∼570 Ma, magmatism recorded by the Radwa alkali granite might represent igneous activity associated with the Cadomian orogeny and southward subduction beneath the northern edge of Gondwana.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Copyright
© U.S. Gov’t Work in Public Domain, 2025.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Simplified geological map of the Radwa alkali granite pluton and surrounding metasedimentary rocks (modified from Pellaton, 1979). The inset shows location of the pluton in the Arabian Shield, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The labelled basement units are described in the text.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Petrography of sample 111618 (Radwa alkali granite). (a) SEM full thin-section scan, showing predominant perthitic alkali feldspar (Afs) and quartz (Qtz). (b) High magnification optical view (crossed polars) optimised by adjustment of contrast and brightness to show the texture of perthitic alkali feldspar crystals; note the pervasive, weak sericitic alteration. Contact between mafic silicate minerals and perthitic alkali feldspar plus quartz, shown by red lines. (c) Slightly higher magnification view (in plane-polarised light) of part (b) showing the textural relationship of arfvedsonite (Arf) and aegirine (Aeg). Note the irregular, somewhat altered grain boundaries of arfvedsonite.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) images showing the crystal structure of the five zircon colour populations in sample 111618. Red dots show the locations of the EBSD analytical spots (grains imaged in incandescent transmitted light). Kikuchi bands patterns confirm that all grains are zircon: (a) tan zircon core; (b) green zircon; (c) blue zircon; (d) yellow zircon; (e) dark brown zircon core; (f) R33 standard zircon; R33 also used for SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology. Abbreviation: MAD (mean angular deviation) is the goodness of fit of the solution to the reference pattern.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Images of five zircon colour populations. The images in the left-hand column are by transmitted light photomicroscopy, those in middle column are by SEM cathodoluminescence and those in right-hand column are secondary electron images by SEM.

Figure 4

Table 1. Characteristics of zircon, titanite and synchysite from Radwa alkali granite

Figure 5

Figure 5. Transmitted light (left) and cathodoluminescence (right) image pairs showing distinct rims on zircon grains: (a) dark brown zircon cores overgrown by green (or tan) zircon rims; (b) tan zircon cores with oscillatory zoning, overgrown by unzoned dark (in CL) rims.

Figure 6

Figure 6. SiO2 vs. ZrO2 EPMA of five colour populations of zircon. Compositions of dark brown and yellow zircon display considerable variation (parts a, g), whereas green, blue and tan zircon yield coherent data clusters with minimal variation (parts c–e). Distinct rims on brown and tan zircon grains were analysed separately (parts b,f).

Figure 7

Figure 7. SHRIMP isotopic data for zircon from sample 111618, Radwa alkali granite. The figures in the left column are Tera-Wasserburg concordia plots; those in the right column are plots of UO/U versus relative analysis time for both standard zircon (filled squares) and zircon from sample 111618 (coloured circles). Grey error ellipses on figures in the left column correspond to analyses with UO/U values which are outside of the acceptable range and were excluded from age calculations: (a,b) dark brown zircon – all analyses yielded unacceptable UO/U, which precluded an age calculation from these data for dark brown zircon; (c,d) green zircon – thirteen (of 26) analyses were excluded (based on UO/U systematics) from the age calculation; (e,f) blue zircon – eight (of 24) analyses were excluded (based on UO/U systematics) from the age calculation.

Figure 8

Figure 8. SHRIMP isotopic data for zircon from sample 111618, Radwa alkali granite. Figures in the left-column are Tera-Wasserburg concordia plots, figures in the right column are plots of UO/U versus relative analysis time for both standard zircon (filled squares) and zircon from sample 111618 (coloured circles): (a,b) tan zircon – UO/U for all sample analyses are commensurate with the standard; the inset in (a) shows weighted average plot of 206Pb/238U ages (± 2 sigma); (c,d) yellow zircon – all analyses yielded unacceptable UO/U, which precludes an age calculation from these data.

Figure 9

Figure 9. LA-ICP-MS isotopic data, on Tera-Wasserburg concordia plots, for five zircon colour populations from sample 111618, Radwa alkali granite. Data shown by dashed error ellipses were excluded from age calculations: (a) data for dark brown zircon; discordant data result in calculation of an imprecise lower intercept age; (b) data for green zircon; discordant results preclude calculation of a lower intercept age; (c) data for blue zircon, resulting in calculation of a lower intercept age; (d) data for tan zircon analysed during session 1. Blue ellipse corresponds to the calculated Concordia Age; (e) data for tan zircon analysed during session 2; the blue ellipse corresponds to the calculated Concordia Age; (f) data for yellow zircon, resulting in calculation of a lower intercept age.

Figure 10

Figure 10. BSE (left) and transmitted light (right) images of titanite from sample 111618, Radwa alkali granite: (a) unzoned, anhedral grain; (b) faintly zoned grain with small white overgrowth; (c) unzoned core with oscillatory zoned mantle; (d) oscillatory zoned core and mantle, overgrown by splotchy zoned outer domain; (e) Concordia plot of LA-ICP-MS data for titanite. Data corresponding to dashed ellipses were excluded from the age calculation.

Figure 11

Figure 11. REE distribution patterns for five zircon colour populations from sample 111618, Radwa alkali granite: (a) REE patterns for dark brown zircon; (b) unusual horizontal REE patterns (i.e. relatively unfractionated) for green zircon; (c) unusual horizontal REE patterns (i.e. relatively unfractionated). See text for further discussion of REE abundances in green and blue zircon; (d) tan zircon. Cores and rims have parallel REE patterns, rims have greater total REE abundances. Cores and rims are HREE-enriched and have small negative Eu anomalies that are somewhat atypical of igneous zircon; (e) REE patterns for yellow zircon are characterised by moderate negative Eu anomalies and HREE-enrichment.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Trace-element geochemistry of five zircon colour populations from sample 111618, Radwa alkali granite: (a) Total REE (ppm) versus Th (ppm), showing that the REE and Th contents of dark brown, green, blue and yellow zircon populations are distinctly greater than in tan zircon; (b) Th/U versus Yb/Gd, showing that dark brown, green blue and yellow zircon populations have elevated Th/U (due to high Th contents) and generally lower Yb/Gd relative to tan zircon; (c) Hf (ppm) versus Y (ppm); (d) U (ppm) versus Th/U. Tan and dark brown zircon have similar U contents that are distinctly elevated relative to those of green, blue and yellow zircon populations.

Figure 13

Table 2. Age summary for Radwa alkali granite

Figure 14

Figure 13. LA-ICP-MS trace-element contents of green, blue, tan and dark brown zircons from sample 111618, Radwa alkali granite. The labelled peaks are elements for which there are significant differences between values for green and blue zircon (green and blue lines, respectively). The data for dark brown zircon (brown lines) show enrichment in nearly all elements compared to other colours. The data for the tan euhedral zircon (dashed black lines) are shown for comparison.

Supplementary material: File

Aleinikoff et al. supplementary material 1

Aleinikoff et al. supplementary material
Download Aleinikoff et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 476.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Aleinikoff et al. supplementary material 2

Aleinikoff et al. supplementary material
Download Aleinikoff et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 29.7 KB