Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:58:17.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagnostic flexible versus rigid bronchoscopy for the assessment of tracheomalacia in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

J Choi*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
H Dharmarajan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
J Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
K A Dunsky
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
T J Vece
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics – Pulmonology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
E H Chiou
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics – Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
J Ongkasuwan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Jonathan Choi, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza Suite NA-102, Houston, TX 77030, USA E-mail: choi.s.jonathan@gmail.com Fax: +1 713 798 3403
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This project compares the degree of tracheal collapse determined by rigid and flexible bronchoscopy in paediatric patients with tracheomalacia.

Methods

A total of nine patients with tracheomalacia underwent both rigid and flexible video bronchoscopy. All patients were breathing spontaneously. Cross-sectional images of the airway were processed using the ImageJ program and analysed via colour histogram mode technique in order to delineate the luminal area. Paired t-tests (conducted using Stata software version 13.0) quantified differences between rigid and flexible bronchoscopes regarding the ratios of luminal pixels at maximum airway collapse to expansion. Correlation between both techniques in terms of airway collapse to expansion ratios was determined by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient (R).

Results

The difference in ratios of maximum collapse to expansion between rigid and flexible bronchoscopy was not statistically significant (p = 0.4656) and was positively correlated (R = 0.523).

Conclusion

The ratios suggest that rigid and flexible bronchoscopy are equally efficacious in assessing tracheomalacia severity, and may be used interchangeably in a clinical setting.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Pre- and (b) post-ImageJ processed images of flexible bronchoscopy, and (c) pre- and (d) post-ImageJ processed images of rigid bronchoscopy, from patient six taken during luminal collapse. Yellow lines outline the region used to measure luminal area.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Scatter plot of rigid bronchoscopy versus flexible bronchoscopy maximum airway collapse to expansion ratio. The Pearson coefficient was calculated to be 0.523, indicating a positive correlation between the diagnostic methods.

Figure 2

Table 1. Rigid and flexible bronchoscopy data