Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T08:27:47.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the couple dynamics of wall-mounted flexible plates in tandem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2018

Y. Jin
Affiliation:
Mechanical Science and Engineering Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
J.-T. Kim
Affiliation:
Mechanical Science and Engineering Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Z. Mao
Affiliation:
Mechanical Science and Engineering Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USAState Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering and Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
L. P. Chamorro*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Science and Engineering Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USACivil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USAAerospace Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: lpchamo@illinois.edu

Abstract

The dynamics of two rectangular, flexible plates of low aspect ratio $h/b$ (height/width= 4) was experimentally investigated in tandem arrangements under uniform flows at various Cauchy numbers $Ca=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{f}bU_{0}^{2}h^{3}/(EI)\in [15,77]$ (where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{f}$ is the fluid density, $U_{0}$ is the incoming flow velocity, $E$ is the Young’s modulus and $I$ is the second moment of the area) and spacings $s_{x}=\unicode[STIX]{x0394}x/h=0.5$, 1 and 2. Planar particle image velocimetry (PIV) and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) were used to characterize the surrounding flow field and oscillations of the wall-mounted structures. Results show that the oscillations of the upstream plate were dominated by its natural frequency. However, the motions of the downstream plate were significantly modulated by the induced flow and coherent motions shed from the upstream structure. Such modulation led to highly correlated motions between the plates with similar amplitude in the case $s_{x}=0.5$, to comparatively larger oscillation amplitude of the downstream plate in the intermediate separation $s_{x}=1$, and roughly decoupled interaction for $s_{x}=2$. Despite that the intensity of the oscillations of the upstream plate increased monotonically with $Ca$, this was not the case for the downstream plate at $s_{x}=1$ and 2 due to flow fluctuations, vortex shedding and large structure deformation; as a result, it exhibited a local minimum. Supported with measurements, a mathematical model was derived to quantitatively explain this behaviour.

JFM classification

Information

Type
JFM Rapids
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1.(a) Layout and geometry of the flexible plates; (b) basic schematic of the experimental set-up.

Figure 1

Figure 2.(a) Time-averaged tip position ($X_{0},Y_{0}$) of the upstream ($P_{u}$) and downstream ($P_{d}$) plates for $Ca\in [15,77]$; (b) streamwise velocity distribution $U/U_{0}$ at $Ca=15$; (c) $U/U_{0}$ at $Ca=30$. Cases with $s_{x}=0.5$.

Figure 2

Figure 3.(a) Intensity of the tip motions $I_{tip}$ across $Ca$ for the two plates; (b) cross-correlation function $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{p_{u},p_{d}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F})$ for selected $Ca$; (c) 2D compensated spectra of the tip displacements of the $P_{u}$ plate; (d) same as (c) for the $P_{d}$ plate. Cases with $s_{x}=0.5$.

Figure 3

Figure 4.Time-averaged tip position ($X_{0},Y_{0}$) of the upstream ($P_{u}$) and downstream ($P_{d}$) plates for $Ca\in [15,77]$; (b) streamwise velocity distribution $U/U_{0}$ at $Ca=15$; (c) $U/U_{0}$ at $Ca=30$. Cases with $s_{x}=1$.

Figure 4

Figure 5.(a) Intensity of the tip motions $I_{tip}$ across $Ca$ for the two plates; (b) cross-correlation function $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{p_{u},p_{d}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F})$ for selected $Ca$; (c) 2D compensated spectra of the tip displacements of the $P_{u}$ plate; (d) same as (c) for the $P_{d}$ plate. Cases with $s_{x}=1$.

Figure 5

Figure 6.(a) Turbulence kinetic energy ($TKE$) distribution for $Ca=15$; (b) same as (a) but for $Ca=30$; (c) average intensity of the velocity normal to the plate within a circular region centred at the tip with radius $R=\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}h$ for various $\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}$. Cases with $s_{x}=1$.

Figure 6

Figure 7.(a) Local bending stiffness $\text{d}s^{\ast }/\text{d}p^{\ast }$ as a function of $X_{0}/h$; (b) driven-harmonic-oscillator frequency response function $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$ for the plate across $Ca$; (c) modelled and measured tip oscillation intensity $I_{tip}/\bar{I}_{tip}$. Cases with $s_{x}=1$.

Figure 7

Figure 8.(a) Time-averaged tip position ($X_{0},Y_{0}$) of the upstream ($P_{u}$) and downstream ($P_{d}$) plates for $Ca\in [15,77]$; (b) streamwise velocity distribution $U/U_{0}$ at $Ca=15$; (c) $U/U_{0}$ at $Ca=30$. Cases with $s_{x}=2$.

Figure 8

Figure 9.(a) Intensity of the tip motions $I_{tip}$ across $Ca$ for the two plates; (b) cross-correlation function $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{p_{u},p_{d}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F})$ for selected $Ca$; (c) 2D compensated spectra of the tip displacements of the $P_{u}$ plate; (d) same as (c) for the $P_{d}$ plate. Cases with $s_{x}=2$.

Figure 9

Figure 10.(a) Turbulence kinetic energy ($TKE$) distribution for $Ca=15$; (b) same as (a) but $Ca=30$; (c) modelled and measured tip oscillation intensity $I_{tip}/\bar{I}_{tip}$. Cases with $s_{x}=2$.