Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:34:42.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micromechanical modeling of fatigue crack initiation in polycrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2017

Martin Boeff
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44801, Germany
Hamad ul Hassan*
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44801, Germany
Alexander Hartmaier
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum 44801, Germany
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: Hamad.ulhassan@rub.de

Abstract

Fatigue is an important mechanism for the failure of components in many engineering applications and a significant proportion of the fatigue life is spent in the crack initiation phase. Although a large number of research work addresses fatigue life and fatigue crack growth, the problem of modeling crack initiation remains a major challenge in the scientific and engineering community. In the present work, a micromechanical model is developed and applied to study fatigue crack initiation. In particular, the effect of different hardening mechanisms on fatigue crack initiation is investigated. To accomplish this, a model describing the evolution of the particular dislocation structures observed under cyclic plastic deformation is implemented and applied on randomly generated representative microstructures to investigate fatigue crack initiation. Finally, a method is presented to calculate the S–N curve for the polycrystalline materials. With this work, it is demonstrated how the micromechanical modeling can support the understanding of damage and failure mechanisms occurring during fatigue.

Figure 0

TABLE I. Material parameters for ferrite are taken from Inal et al. (elastic)44 and Mahmoody45 (isotropic), while the channel evolution parameters are approximated from Ref. 40 and the kinematic hardening parameters are chosen without reference for this parametric study.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. Schematic sketch of the algorithm to estimate the fatigue crack initiation lifetime.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. Visualisation of global stress–strain hysteresis for the RVE is shown in figure (a) while the evolution of maximum and minimum stress amplitude is shown in figure (b).

Figure 3

FIG. 3. The accumulated plastic slip distribution of set 1 is given in (a1–c1), while the accumulated plastic slip distribution of set 2 is given in (a2–c2) for 20, 50, and 100 cycles, respectively. The strain amplitude is εa = 0.25%.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Visualisation of the accumulated plastic slip along the path defined in Fig. 3(a1) after 5, 20, 50, 100 loading cycles for the model using the material parameter set 1 in (a) and for the parameter set 2 in (b). Note that the y-axis showing the accumulated plastic slip has a different scale.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. Visualisation of the channel fraction for three different strain amplitudes as given in the legends. For the three strain amplitudes, the situation is plotted when the volume fraction reached fCh = 0.95 locally for the first time. Subfigure (a) shows the distribution for εa = 0.125% after 200 cycles, subfigure (b) for εa = 0.175% for 116 cycles and subfigure (c) for εa = 0.375% after 22 cycles.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. Saturated global stress–strain cycle (a) εa = 0.075% (b) εa = 0.375%. The local values (thin orange points) and the complete grain averaged values (thick red points) are plotted at the maximum and the minimum applied strain level.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. Visualisation of fatigue crack initiation diagram with applied stress amplitude plotted over determined crack initiation cycle. Figure (a) shows the raw data for 10 different RVEs, while figure (b) shows the mean value with a band of maximum deviation. Note that the simulations are strain controlled, such that there is a small variation in the homogenised stress amplitudes in figure (a).