Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T05:23:44.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing the pitting corrosion behavior of prominent Zr-based bulk metallic glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2014

Petre Flaviu Gostin*
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institute for Solid State and Materials Research IFW Dresden, Dresden D-01171, Germany
Dimitri Eigel
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institute for Solid State and Materials Research IFW Dresden, Dresden D-01171, Germany; and Department of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Science, TU Dresden, Dresden D-01069, Germany
Daniel Grell
Affiliation:
Materials Testing, University of Kaiserslautern, Gottlieb-Daimler-Straße, Kaiserslautern D-67663, Germany
Jürgen Eckert
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institute for Solid State and Materials Research IFW Dresden, Dresden D-01171, Germany; and Institute of Materials Science, Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, TU Dresden, Dresden D-01062, Germany
Eberhard Kerscher
Affiliation:
Materials Testing, University of Kaiserslautern, Gottlieb-Daimler-Straße, Kaiserslautern D-67663, Germany
Annett Gebert
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institute for Solid State and Materials Research IFW Dresden, Dresden D-01171, Germany
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: f.p.gostin@ifw-dresden.de

Abstract

Five well-known Zr-based alloys of the systems Zr–Cu–Al–(Ni–Nb, Ni–Ti, Ag) (Cu = 15.4–36 at.%) with the highest glass-forming ability were comparatively analyzed regarding their pitting corrosion resistance and repassivation ability in a chloride-containing solution. Potentiodynamic polarization measurements were conducted in the neutral 0.01 M Na2SO4 + 0.1 M NaCl electrolyte and local corrosion damages were subsequently investigated with high resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM) coupled with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Both pitting and repassivation potential correlate with the Cu concentration, i.e., those potentials decrease with increasing Cu content. Pit morphology is not composition dependent: while initially hemispherical pits then develop an irregular shape and a porous rim. Corrosion products are rich in Cu, O, and often Cl species. A combination of low Cu and high Nb or Ti contents is most beneficial for a high pitting resistance of Zr-based bulk metallic glasses. The bulk glassy Zr57Cu15.4Al10Ni12.6Nb5 (Vit 106) and Zr52.5Cu17.9Al10Ni14.6Ti5 (Vit 105) alloys exhibit the highest pitting resistance.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

TABLE I. The chemical composition of a Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 alloy ingot determined at three random locations in the ingot confirming a high level of compositional homogeneity. The concentration of metallic elements was measured by ICP-OES. Each given value represents the mean of four individual measurements of the same specimen (corresponding to one location). Values in brackets represent standard deviation.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. Representative linear anodic polarization curves of Zr–Cu-based BMGs in 0.01 M Na2SO4 + 0.1 M NaCl solution (scan rate 0.5 mV s−1). Corrosion, pitting, and repassivation potentials (Ecorr, EP, and ER) are indicated by small arrows. The dashed horizontal arrow indicates the tendency of decreasing EP and ER values with increasing Cu content of the bulk glassy alloy.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. Corrosion potential (Ecorr), pitting potential (EP), and repassivation potential (ER) of five Zr–Cu-based BMGs in 0.01 M Na2SO4 + 0.1 M NaCl solution plotted against the Cu concentration in the alloys. The symbols represent mean values of five individual measurements. The error bars represent standard deviation.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. SEM image and EDX mapping of an early state of a growing pit on the cross-section of a Zr52.5Cu17.9Al10Ni14.6Ti5 bulk metallic sample glass (Vit 105). The pit was obtained by linear anodic polarization in 0.01 M Na2SO4 + 0.1 M NaCl solution up to the pitting potential EP (polarization was interrupted at i = 1 mA cm−2).

Figure 4

FIG. 4. SEM image and EDX mapping of a pitted area on the cross-section of a Zr52.5Cu17.9Al10Ni14.6Ti5 bulk metallic glass (Vit 105) sample observed after extensive growth and repassivation. The pit was obtained by linear anodic polarization to the pitting potential EP and subsequent reverse scanning to the repassivation potential ER.