Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T20:08:31.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Insights into stent implantation for coronary artery lesions caused by Kawasaki disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2020

Etsuko Tsuda*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Etsuko Tsuda, MD, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 6-1 Kishibe-shinmachi, Suita-shi, Osaka564-8565, Japan. Tel: +81 6 6170 1070; Fax: +81-6-6170-1782. E-mail: etsuda@ncvc.go.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fifty years have passed since the first report of Kawasaki disease in 1967, and the prevalence of acute coronary syndrome in Kawasaki disease patients with coronary artery lesions exceeding 40 years old has increased. Primary coronary stent implantation is currently an acceptable method in ischaemic coronary heart disease in adults. However, it is unknown whether the stent implantation is effective or not in this population. As the clue to answer this question, I reviewed the references on Kawasaki disease patients who underwent the stent implantations between 1997 and 2019. Thirty-three patients underwent stent implantations for 34 coronary arteries. Adverse effects in the late period were found in 19 (68%) of 28 vessels with follow-up angiograms. There were complete occlusion 9, restenosis 8, and migration 2. A new aneurysm formation was found in 7 (37%) among the 19 vessels, and 6 (86%) of the 7 vessels were drug-eluting stent and 5 were found after the procedure for chronic total occlusion. The adverse effects free-rate at 1 year and 3 years were 57 and 25%, respectively. At present, the usefulness of stent implantation in the long-term results was scarce. Even if primary percutaneous coronary intervention without a stent implantation is performed for acute coronary syndrome, it can be expected to maintain the patency of the culprit lesion for several years. It is better to avoid a stent implantation as long as possible in this population. Knowing the long-term efficacy and complications of stent implantations is important for deciding the procedure.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Primary stenting for acute coronary syndrome

Figure 1

Table 2. Elective coronary stent implantations

Figure 2

Table 3. Stent implantations for chronic total occlusions

Figure 3

Table 4. Covered stents

Figure 4

Figure 1. Coronary angiograms before and after the intracoronary thrombolysis therapy for acute myocardial infarction. (a) Before the intracoronary thrombolysis therapy. (b and c) After the intracoronary thrombolysis therapy. (d) 5 years after the intracoronary thrombolysis therapy.

Figure 5

Figure 2. Coronary angiograms before and after the percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS. (a) Coronary angiogram at the time of the initial visit at 33 years old. (b) Coronary angiogram 3 days after intraaortic balloon pumping was initiated. (c) Coronary angiogram after the aspiration therapy during the second visit. (d) Coronary angiogram after percutaneous balloon angioplasty.

Figure 6

Figure 3. Follow-up coronary angiograms after the percutaneous transluminal coronary rotational atherectomy for localised stenosis in the left circumflex. (Left) Coronary angiograms before and after the transluminal coronary rotational atherectomy. (Right) Sixteen years after the transluminal coronary rotational atherectomy.

Figure 7

Table 5. Stent implantations and adverse effects

Figure 8

Table 6. Adverse effects after stent implantations in follow-up angiograms