Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:34:57.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primary tracheoesophageal puncture and cricopharyngeal myotomy in stapler-assisted total laryngectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

D M Beswick  and
E J Damrose
D M Beswick
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA
E J Damrose*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Edward J Damrose, Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 801 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Fax: +1 650 725 8502 E-mail: edamrose@stanford.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the utility of the hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure in stapler-assisted laryngectomy.

Methods:

Patients who underwent total laryngectomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2015 were reviewed. The interventions assessed were surgical creation of a tracheoesophageal puncture and placement of a voice prosthesis. The outcomes measured included voicing ability and valve failure.

Results:

Thirty-nine patients underwent total laryngectomy or pharyngolaryngectomy. Of these, nine underwent stapler-assisted laryngectomy; seven of the nine patients underwent concurrent stapler-assisted laryngectomy, cricopharyngeal myotomy and a hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure. These seven patients were the focus of this review. Successful voicing and oral alimentation was achieved in all patients. Mean time to phonation was 30 days (range, 7–77 days) and mean time to first valve change was 90 days (range, 35–117 days).

Conclusion:

Primary tracheoesophageal puncture with concurrent voice prosthesis placement and cricopharyngeal myotomy is easily performed with stapler-assisted laryngectomy. The hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure is a simple method that enables a single operator to achieve primary tracheoesophageal puncture and valve placement; in addition, it facilitates concurrent cricopharyngeal myotomy.

Keywords

LarynxLaryngectomySurgical StaplersPuncturesVoiceNeoplasms

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 130 , Issue 7 , July 2016 , pp. 686 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Introduction

Tracheoesophageal puncture is an important part of voice rehabilitation for the total laryngectomy patient, and was originally described as a secondary procedure following laryngectomy.Reference Singer and Blom1 Within two years of Singer and Blom's ground-breaking paper,Reference Singer and Blom1 it was noted that tracheoesophageal puncture could be performed primarily.Reference Maves and Lingeman2–Reference Lau, Wei, Ho and Lam5 Primary tracheoesophageal puncture can eliminate the need for a second procedure following laryngectomy and can facilitate more rapid acquisition of tracheoesophageal speech. Following laryngectomy and prior to manual suture closure of the pharynx, the puncture is created and maintained with a feeding tube or other catheter, with voice prosthesis placement taking place at a later date. To facilitate acquisition of fluent tracheoesophageal speech, cricopharyngeal myotomy is frequently performed concurrently.Reference Elmiyeh, Dwivedi, Jallali, Chisholm, Kazi and Clarke6

In concert with these developments in voice restoration, Halevy and Sade reported the first use of staplers in performing total laryngectomy in 1983.Reference Halevy and Sade7 In stapler-assisted laryngectomy, a linear stapler is used to cut and close the pharynx, with concomitant excision of the larynx. This shortens operative time, simplifies and standardises pharyngeal closure, prevents salivary spillage and wound contamination, and affords fistula rates comparable to or better than those for conventional pharyngeal closure via suture.Reference Wolfensberger and Simmen8–Reference Dedivitis, Aires, Pfuetzenreiter, Castro and Guimarães17

Following stapler-assisted laryngectomy, the pharynx is closed; therefore, the surgeon must rely on endoscopic methods for creation of the tracheoesophageal puncture. Leahy and Tufano described a flexible fibre-optic technique for tracheoesophageal puncture creation used concurrently with stapler-assisted laryngectomy in 2010, but to date no further work in this regard has been published.Reference Leahy and Tufano18

Herein, we describe our initial experience with a method that combines stapler-assisted laryngectomy and primary tracheoesophageal puncture, with concurrent prosthesis placement and cricopharyngeal myotomy. This method of tracheoesophageal puncture has been published previously and is referred to as the hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure.Reference Damrose, Cho and Goode19

Materials and methods

This study was conducted with the approval of the Stanford University Medical Center Institutional Review Board.

Patients

The charts of patients who underwent total laryngectomy and a hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure between January 2009 and March 2015 were reviewed. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, surgical data, complications, ability to achieve voicing and time to valve failure.

Procedure

The feeding tube port from the Blom–Singer tracheoesophageal puncture set is removed, and the Provox® Guidewire is coapted to the remnant guidewire and dilator to create the hybrid device (Figure 1), as previously described.Reference Damrose, Cho and Goode19

Fig. 1

(a) Provox Guidewire (left) and InHealth Technologies dilator (right). (b) Provox Guidewire coapted to the InHealth Technologies dilator to create the hybrid device.

To facilitate cricopharyngeal myotomy after completing stapler-assisted laryngectomy, a 7.0 wire-reinforced endotracheal tube is passed carefully via the mouth, and advanced sequentially into the pharynx then the oesophagus. The cuff is inflated proximal to the stoma and inferior to the staple line, and residual muscle is cut with a number 15 blade to perform a complete myotomy (Figure 2).

Fig. 2

Cricopharyngeal myotomy is performed after inserting endotracheal tube and inflating cuff.

The puncture needle and jacket taken from the Blom–Singer tracheoesophageal puncture set is used to create the puncture in the lumen of the endotracheal tube (Figure 3). The needle and endotracheal tube are withdrawn, leaving the jacket in place in the puncture site.

Fig. 3

The puncture needle and jacket taken from the Blom–Singer tracheoesophageal puncture set is used to puncture the lumen of the endotracheal tube.

The wire end of the Blom–Singer tracheoesophageal puncture device is passed in a retrograde fashion, delivering the jacket, wire, dilator and Provox Guidewire through the mouth. The Provox Guidewire is detached from the Blom–Singer tracheoesophageal puncture set, and the indwelling voice prosthesis, either Atos Provox or InHealth Technologies®, is then inserted onto the Provox Guidewire. The valve is then passed in an anterograde fashion and inserted into the puncture site (Figure 4).

Fig. 4

The valve is passed in an anterograde fashion and inserted into the puncture site.

Results

Thirty-nine patients underwent total laryngectomy performed by the senior author (EJD) for malignancy of the larynx and/or pharynx, with either primary or secondary tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration. Of these, nine patients underwent stapler-assisted laryngectomy; seven of these nine patients concurrently underwent a hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure and stapler-assisted laryngectomy with cricopharyngeal myotomy. These seven patients were the focus of this review.

Demographic and clinical data are shown in Table I. Five of the seven patients (71 per cent) had undergone prior radiation therapy. None of the patients had a history of hypothyroidism or had undergone prior chemotherapy. The procedure was successfully attempted and accomplished in all patients. The average length of hospital stay was 6 days (range, 2–10 days). One patient developed a pharyngocutaneous fistula and one patient developed a haematoma. No patient required a subsequent operative procedure to replace or repair their tracheoesophageal prosthesis.

Table I

Demographic and clinical data*

*For the seven patients who underwent stapler-assisted laryngectomy with hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture

All seven patients achieved voicing. Mean time to first documented phonation was 30 days (range, 7–77 days). Mean time to first valve change was 90 days (range, 35–177 days) and mean follow-up time was 118 months (range, 88–145 months). The most common reason for valve change was leakage through the prosthesis.

Discussion

The utility of staplers for pharyngeal closure was originally recognised in 1969, when they were used in the resection of hypopharyngeal diverticulae,Reference Hoehn and Payne20 but it was not until 1983 that Halevy and Sade described their applicability in the performance of total laryngectomy.Reference Halevy and Sade7 Stapler-assisted total laryngectomy affords simultaneous laryngeal excision with pharyngeal closure, shortening and simplifying the procedure. The fistulisation rates are equivalent or superior to those of conventional closure. Furthermore, sealing the pharynx and resecting the larynx concurrently eliminates the risk of salivary wound contamination, and theoretically reduces the risk of tumour seeding.Reference Wolfensberger and Simmen8–Reference Dedivitis, Aires, Pfuetzenreiter, Castro and Guimarães17

In conventional laryngectomy and pharyngeal closure, the puncture is created and any residual cricopharyngeal muscle is cut prior to closing the pharynx. This method allows easy creation of the puncture with placement under direct visualisation by a single operator. With stapler-assisted laryngectomy, however, the pharyngeal and oesophageal lumen cannot be accessed through the neck, and therefore endoscopic techniques must be employed.

In the only publication to address primary tracheoesophageal puncture in patients undergoing stapler-assisted laryngectomy, Leahy and Tufano described a two-operator method using a flexible fibre-optic oesophagogastroduodenoscope passed into the cervical esophagus.Reference Leahy and Tufano18 Following transillumination and insufflation, a guidewire and breakaway dilator system were employed to create the puncture, with patency of the tract maintained by the final introduction of a red rubber catheter. Voice prosthesis placement was then undertaken two to three weeks later in clinic, with all patients achieving alaryngeal speech.

Cricopharyngeal myotomy is frequently performed with or after laryngectomy to enhance phonation. Phonation enhancement is the result of optimisation of the vibrations of the pharyngoesophageal segment used in tracheoesophageal speech.Reference Hamaker, Singer, Blom and Daniels3–Reference Elmiyeh, Dwivedi, Jallali, Chisholm, Kazi and Clarke6 In the hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure, a cuffed endotracheal tube is used to facilitate myotomy. As described by Chodosh in 1975 for the treatment of dysphagia secondary to cricopharyngeal spasm, the tube is easily advanced along the pharynx and cervical oesophagus.Reference Chodosh21 Cuff inflation allows ready distension of the target muscle fibres and a firm platform on which to carefully section them.Reference Chodosh21 When passed along the pharynx following stapler-assisted laryngectomy, the stapled suture line is more than strong enough to allow passage of the tube without fear of perforation. The endotracheal tube is also helpful for creation of the puncture.

  • • The utility of primary hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure in stapler-assisted laryngectomy with cricopharyngeal myotomy has not been previously evaluated

  • • This retrospective review demonstrates that the procedure is successful in this population, including voicing outcomes

  • • The hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure is simple, and a single operator can achieve primary tracheoesophageal puncture and valve placement

  • • In addition, the procedure facilitates concurrent cricopharyngeal myotomy

It is possible to puncture directly into the lumen of the endotracheal tube using a needle, as originally described by Maniglia in 1982,Reference Maniglia22 and subsequently with slight modification by Cannon in 2001.Reference Cannon23 This obviates the risk of perforating the posterior oesophagus and subsequently allows passage of a guidewire into the pharynx. In our experience with the hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure, the tip of the endotracheal tube can be readily seen as a dimple in the tracheoesophageal party wall, and allows for precise puncture placement. Leahy and Tufano readily recognised the advantages of stapler-assisted laryngectomy over conventional pharyngeal closure, and theorised that primary tracheoesophageal puncture was still possible in these patients.Reference Leahy and Tufano18

This particular study is a retrospective review of a new technique and is subject to bias. In addition, the number of patients included is not large. Nonetheless, it is evident that the hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure affords several additional advantages over conventional pharyngeal closure. This is a single-operator as opposed to a two-operator procedure. It allows for concomitant puncture and valve placement. In addition, it enables the easy accomplishment of pharyngeal myotomy. Overall, it is helpful in the acquisition of fluent tracheoesophageal speech.

Conclusion

The hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure is a simple and reliable method of performing tracheoesophageal puncture with simultaneous placement of a voice prosthesis. The technique is readily applicable for use in stapler-assisted total laryngectomy through the insertion of an endotracheal tube into the sealed pharynx. This manoeuvre not only assists puncture and valve placement but also enables concomitant cricopharyngeal myotomy. The staple line is more than robust to permit the passage of the tube. Combining the hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure and stapler-assisted laryngectomy may help to simplify and optimise the techniques of total laryngectomy and primary tracheoesophageal puncture.

Footnotes

Presented at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings, 14–18 May 2014, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

References

1Singer, MI, Blom, ED.An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89:529–33Google Scholar
2Maves, MD, Lingeman, RE.Primary vocal rehabilitation using the Blom-Singer and Panje voice prostheses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982;91:458–60Google Scholar
3Hamaker, RC, Singer, MI, Blom, ED, Daniels, HA.Primary voice restoration at laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:182–6Google Scholar
4Juarbe, C, Shemen, L, Eberle, R, Klatsky, I, Fox, M.Primary tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration. Am J Surg 1986;152:464–6Google Scholar
5Lau, WF, Wei, WI, Ho, CM, Lam, KH.Immediate tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration in laryngopharyngeal resection. Am J Surg 1988;156:269–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Elmiyeh, B, Dwivedi, RC, Jallali, N, Chisholm, EJ, Kazi, R, Clarke, PM et al. Surgical voice restoration after total laryngectomy: an overview. Indian J Cancer 2010;47:239–47Google Scholar
7Halevy, A, Sade, J.The use of thoracoabdominal staplers in ENT surgery. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1983;237:185–90Google Scholar
8Wolfensberger, M, Simmen, D.Staple closure of the hypopharynx after diverticulectomy and total laryngectomy. Dysphagia 1991;6:26–9Google Scholar
9Bedrin, L, Ginsburg, G, Horowitz, Z, Talmi, YP.25-year experience of using a linear stapler in laryngectomy. Head Neck 2005;27:1073–109Google Scholar
10Altissimi, G, Frenguelli, A.Linear stapler closure of the pharynx during total laryngectomy: a 15-year experience (from closed technique to semi-closed technique). Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2007;27:118–22Google ScholarPubMed
11Ahsan, F, Ah-See, KW, Hussain, A.Stapled closed technique for laryngectomy and pharyngeal repair. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:1245–8Google Scholar
12Gonçalves, AJ, de Souza, JA Jr, Menezes, MB, Kavabata, NK, Suehara, AB, Lehn, CN.Pharyngocutaneous fistulae following total laryngectomy comparison between manual and mechanical sutures. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:1793–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Calli, C, Pinar, E, Oncel, S.Pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy: less common with mechanical stapler closure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120:339–44Google Scholar
14Sannikorn, P, Pornniwes, N.Comparison of outcomes for staple and conventional closure of the pharynx following total laryngectomy. J Med Assoc Thai 2013;96(suppl 3):S89–93Google Scholar
15Zhang, X, Liu, Z, Li, Q, Liu, X, Li, H, Liu, W et al. Using a linear stapler for pharyngeal closure in total laryngectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1467–71Google Scholar
16Aires, FT, Dedivitis, RA, Castro, MA, Bernardo, WM, Cernea, CR.Efficacy of stapler pharyngeal closure after total laryngectomy: a systematic review. Head Neck 2014;36:739–42Google Scholar
17Dedivitis, RA, Aires, FT, Pfuetzenreiter, EG Jr, Castro, MA, Guimarães, AV.Stapler suture of the pharynx after total laryngectomy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2014;34:94–8Google Scholar
18Leahy, KP, Tufano, RP.Primary tracheoesophageal puncture in stapler-assisted total laryngectomy. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2010;72:124–6Google Scholar
19Damrose, EJ, Cho, DY, Goode, RL.The hybrid tracheoesophageal puncture procedure: indications and outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2014;123:584–90Google Scholar
20Hoehn, JG, Payne, WS.Resection of pharyngoesophageal diverticulum using stapling device. Mayo Clin Proc 1969;44:738–41Google Scholar
21Chodosh, PL.Cricopharyngeal myotomy in the treatment of dysphagia. Laryngoscope 1975;85:1862–73Google Scholar
22Maniglia, AJ.Vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: a flexible fiberoptic endoscopic technique for tracheoesophageal fistula. Laryngoscope 1982;92:1437–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Cannon, CR.Using an endotracheal tube in difficult secondary tracheoesophageal puncture: a novel technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:117–19Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 (a) Provox Guidewire (left) and InHealth Technologies dilator (right). (b) Provox Guidewire coapted to the InHealth Technologies dilator to create the hybrid device.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Cricopharyngeal myotomy is performed after inserting endotracheal tube and inflating cuff.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 The puncture needle and jacket taken from the Blom–Singer tracheoesophageal puncture set is used to puncture the lumen of the endotracheal tube.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 The valve is passed in an anterograde fashion and inserted into the puncture site.

Figure 4

Table I Demographic and clinical data*