Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:16:14.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metal organic framework-modified nitrogen-doped graphene oxygen reduction reaction catalyst synthesized by nanoscale high-energy wet ball-milling structural and electrochemical characterization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2017

Shiqiang Zhuang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey 07102, USA
Bharath Babu Nunna
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey 07102, USA
Eon Soo Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey 07102, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Eon Soo Lee at eonsoo.lee@njit.edu

Abstract

Nitrogen-doped graphene (N-G) is a promising non-platinum group metal catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. A new N-G/metal organic framework (MOF) catalyst is derived by the modification of MOF on N-G catalysts to enhance the electrochemical performance of N-G by increasing the surface area and porosity in this paper. The characterization confirmed that the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface areas of N-G/MOF catalysts are 13–66 times larger than the original N-G catalyst. The highest current density (5.02 mA/cm2) and electron transfer number (3.93) of N-G/MOFs are higher than the N-G catalyst. The current density of N-G/MOF catalyst is even higher than 10 wt% Pt/C catalyst.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. A sketch of the experimental synthesis process of N-G/MOF.

Figure 1

Table I. The list of three experimental conditions of N-G/MOF samples.

Figure 2

Figure 2. SEM images of (a) BM-N-G-16-500, (b) ZIF-8, (c) N-G/MOF-200, (d) N-G/MOF-350, (e) N-G/MOF-500, and (f) N-G/MOF-650.

Figure 3

Figure 3. TEM images of (a) BM-N-G-16-500, (b) N-G/MOF-200, (c) N-G/MOF-350, (d) N-G/MOF-500, and (e) N-G/MOF-650.

Figure 4

Table II. The Zetasizer result: particle sizes of N-G/MOF catalysts generated by different grinding speeds.

Figure 5

Figure 4. (a) BET surface area of original N-G and four N-G/MOF samples with different grinding speeds, (b) the pore volume of original N-G and four N-G/MOF samples with different grinding speeds, and (c) average pore size of original N-G and four N-G/MOF samples with different grinding speeds.

Figure 6

Figure 5. RDE results of (a) current density-comparison among four N-G/MOF catalysts, (b) current density-comparison between BM-N-G-16-500, N-G/MOF-350, and 10 wt% Pt/C, and (c) electron transfer number-comparison between BM-N-G-16-500, N-G/MOF-350, and 10 wt% Pt/C.

Supplementary material: File

Zhuang et al supplementary material 1

Zhuang et al supplementary material

Download Zhuang et al supplementary material 1(File)
File 362.4 KB