Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T02:05:33.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mapping Optimum Nitrogen Crop Uptake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

J. Villodre*
Affiliation:
GIS and Remote Sensing Group. Instituto de Desarrollo Regional. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Campus Universitario SN. Albacete (Spain)
I. Campos
Affiliation:
GIS and Remote Sensing Group. Instituto de Desarrollo Regional. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Campus Universitario SN. Albacete (Spain)
H. Lopez-Corcoles
Affiliation:
Instituto Técnico Agronómico de Albacete (ITAP) Avda. Gregorio Arcos 19, 02005 Albacete (Spain)
J. Gonzalez-Piqueras
Affiliation:
GIS and Remote Sensing Group. Instituto de Desarrollo Regional. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Campus Universitario SN. Albacete (Spain)
L. González
Affiliation:
GIS and Remote Sensing Group. Instituto de Desarrollo Regional. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Campus Universitario SN. Albacete (Spain)
V. Bodas
Affiliation:
Aliara Agrícola S.L. Calle Matadero 11. 45600. Talavera de La Reina (Toledo). Spain
S. Sanchez-Prieto
Affiliation:
GIS and Remote Sensing Group. Instituto de Desarrollo Regional. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Campus Universitario SN. Albacete (Spain)
A. Osann
Affiliation:
GIS and Remote Sensing Group. Instituto de Desarrollo Regional. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Campus Universitario SN. Albacete (Spain)
A. Calera
Affiliation:
GIS and Remote Sensing Group. Instituto de Desarrollo Regional. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Campus Universitario SN. Albacete (Spain)

Abstract

This work proposes a methodology that uses remote sensing (RS) images to obtain optimum nitrogen crop uptake (Nuptake) maps, for the all pixels in the image included in the field during the entire growing season. The Nuptake was determined from relationship between critical nitrogen concentration (Nc) and biomass where biomass was estimated by a crop growth model based on the water use efficiency. The paper proposes the use of this methodology in commercial wheat farm. The results are discussed with respect to field measurements of crop biomass and N concentration on different dates and in zones with different nitrogen treatments from 8 commercial wheat farms in Albacete, Spain during 2015 and 2016.

Figure 0

Table 1 Characteristics of the fields monitored: Management, crop and variety, season monitored, sample plots, fertilizer applied per treatment, irrigation applied and sampling dates.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Sampling plots (black polygon) and PPM from the different commercial fields used for trials. The red band is N treatment F0 and the blue band is N treatment F2. Treatment in the rest of commercial field is F1.

Figure 2

Figure 2 a) Correlation between nitrogen (N) concentration and biomass along the growing cycle for the fields analyzed in this work. The dotted lines represent the maximum (upper line), critical (middle line) and minimum (lower line) values of N concentration for wheat according with Justes et al. (1994). The solid line represent the relationship obtained for the experimental data. b) selection of the experimental data for the plots with optimum management and productions.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Temporal evolution of the optimum nitrogen absorption (Nuptake) in the field number 5 in three selected dates during 2016.