Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:07:44.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated ferroics for sensing, power, RF, and µ-wave electronics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2018

Yingxue Guo
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Laboratory for Integrated Ferroics, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
Ryan Quinlan
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Laboratory for Integrated Ferroics, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
Neville Sun
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Laboratory for Integrated Ferroics, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
Hwaider Lin*
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Laboratory for Integrated Ferroics, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
Nian Xiang Sun
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Laboratory for Integrated Ferroics, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: lin.hw@husky.neu.edu

Abstract

Strong magnetoelectric (ME) coupling realized in magnetic/ferroelectric multiferroic heterostructures provides great potential for different integrated multiferroic devices for sensing, power, RF, and µ-wave electronics. Here, we present the most recent progress on new integrated multiferroic devices including novel integrated magnetic tunable inductors with a wide operation frequency range; integrated nonreciprocal bandpass filter with dual H- and E-field tunability based on magnetostatics surface waves; dual H- and E-field tunable RF bandpass filters with nanomechanical ME resonators; RF nanomechanical ME resonators with pico-Tesla DC magnetic fields sensitivity; a new antenna miniaturization mechanism, acoustically actuated nanomechanical ME antennas, which successfully miniaturize the magnitude in 1-2 orders with the advantages of the high magnetic field sensitivity, highest antenna gain within all nanoscale antennas at the similar frequency, and ground plane immunity on the metallic surface and the human body.

Information

Type
Invited Feature Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Classification of magnetoelctric coupling.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. (a) Electric field dependence of the transmission coefficient (S21) spectra of the FeGaB/PZN-PT multiferroic heterostructure measured by using the network analyzer and (b) magnetic hysteresis loops of the FeGaB/PZN-PT multiferroic heterostructure under different external electric fields measured by VSM.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. FMR spectra of polycrystalline Terfenol-D/PZN-PT at E = 0 kV/cm (blue) and E = 6 kV/cm (red).

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Comparison between different lengths of the FeGaB/Al2O3 film (200 μm and 500 μm): (a) Inductance and (b) quality Factor.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. High tunability of inductance which reaches up to 150% in about 2–3.5 GHz.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. Measured S-parameters of bandpass filter: (a) S11 with H-field tuning, (b) S11 with E-field tuning, and (c) S12 and S22 under 400 DC magnetic field showing 15.8 dB isolation. The inset shows the optical images.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. (a) Measured return loss S11 and insertion loss S21 at zero bias field, (b) resonance frequency as a function of DC magnetic fields, (c) resonance frequency as a function of DC electric fields. The inset is the optical image and (d) SEM image of the coupled resonators with silicon substrate released.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. (a) Admittance curve of the NEMS sensor at various bias DC magnetic fields, (b) resonance frequency and admittance amplitude at the resonance frequency as a function of DC magnetic field, and (c) sensitivity and linearity of the DC magnetic field sensor with DC bias magnetic field of 5 Oe. The inset shows the zoomed-in part ranging from 50 pT to 4 nT in a magnetically unshielded environment and (d) sensitivity and linearity of the DC magnetic field sensor at zero bias magnetic field in a magnetically unshielded environment.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. (a) Schematic illustration of the ME NPR and the induced ME voltage measurement setup, (b) SEM image of the fabricated ME NPR, and (c) admittance curve and Butterworth–van Dyke model fitting of the ME NPR. The inset shows the simulated in-plane displacement of the nanoplate at resonance peak position excited by HRF, (d) admittance curve of the nonmagnetic Cu/AlN control NPR, (e) ME coupling coefficient (left axis) and the induced ME voltage (right axis) versus the frequency of HRF excitation, and (f) induced voltage versus the frequency of HRF excitation for the nonmagnetic device. The inset illustrates the zoomed-in view of the resonance peak area (red circle).

Figure 9

FIG. 9. (a) Schematic illustration of the ME thin-film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBAR) and the antenna measurement setup, (b) SEM image of the fabricated ME FBAR, (c) return loss (S22) of ME FBAR. The inset shows the simulated out-of-plane displacement of the circular disk at resonance peak position, (d) Return loss (S22) curve of the nonmagnetic Al/AlN control FBAR, (e) transmitting and receiving behavior (S12 and S21) of ME FBAR, and (f) transmitting and receiving behavior (S12 and S21) of the nonmagnetic Al/AlN control FBAR.