Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:51:42.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biogeographic and latitudinal patterns of demersal fishes in the Mexican Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2014

Deivis S. Palacios-Salgado*
Affiliation:
Escuela Nacional de Ingeniería Pesquera, Colección Ictiológica (ENIP-UAN), Apartado Postal 10, San Blas, Nayarit 63740, México
V.H. Cruz-Escalona
Affiliation:
Departamento de Pesquerías y Biología Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (CICIMAR-IPN), Apdo. Postal 592, La Paz, Baja California Sur C.P. 23000, México
M.J. Zetina-Rejón
Affiliation:
Departamento de Pesquerías y Biología Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (CICIMAR-IPN), Apdo. Postal 592, La Paz, Baja California Sur C.P. 23000, México
F. Arreguín-Sánchez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Pesquerías y Biología Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (CICIMAR-IPN), Apdo. Postal 592, La Paz, Baja California Sur C.P. 23000, México
J.T. Nieto-Navarro
Affiliation:
Escuela Nacional de Ingeniería Pesquera, Colección Ictiológica (ENIP-UAN), Apartado Postal 10, San Blas, Nayarit 63740, México
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: D.S. Palacios-Salgado, Escuela Nacional de Ingeniería Pesquera, Colección Ictiológica (ENIP-UAN), Apartado Postal 10, San Blas, Nayarit 63740, México email: palaciossalgado@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Latitudinal patterns of composition, biogeographic affinity and indicators of taxonomic diversity are described for the by-catch fish community in five typical shrimping areas in the Mexican Pacific (Upper Gulf of California, Sinaloa-Nayarit, Jalisco-Colima, Michoacán-Guerrero and Gulf of Tehuantepec). The taxonomic composition included two classes, 20 orders, 65 families, 147 genera and 292 species. The family Sciaenidae was the best represented with 33 species, whereas at the genus level, Anchoa was represented with eight species. A high percentage of the species showed wide distribution ranges (30.2% for Cortez Province ~ Panamic Province; 21.3% for San Diego Province ~ Panamic Province); nevertheless, each ecosystem included a characteristic combination of species, apparently related to the physiographic conditions of the ecosystems. Species richness showed a pronounced decrease from the Upper Gulf of California, which has warm-temperate features, to the Gulf of Tehuantepec, which has tropical conditions; this is an opposite trend to that observed in the taxonomic diversity indicators, suggesting that a taxonomic redundancy was present in tropical areas and higher taxonomic diversity was present in the Upper Gulf of California, despite the lower species richness. This is explained by the prevailing environmental conditions and isolation processes generated during the formation of the Gulf of California.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of the five areas of study. A: Upper Gulf of California, B: Sinaloa-Nayarit, C: Jalisco-Colima, D: Michoacán-Guerrero and E: Gulf of Tehuantepec. The shaded area represents the extent of the continental shelf.

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of the cruises along the coast of the Upper Gulf of California (Nava-Romo, 1994), Sinaloa and Nayarit, Jalisco and Colima (Mariscal-Romero & van der Heiden, 2006) Michoacán and Guerrero (Amézcua-Linares, 1996) and in the Gulf of Tehuantepec (Tapia-García & García-Abad, 1998).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Biogeographic affinity of the fish species of the five ecosystems (PA, Aleutian Province; PO, Oregonian Province; PS, San Diego Province; PC, Cortez Province; PM, Mexicana Province; PP, Panamic Province; PPCH, Peruvian-Chilean Province; PMAG, Magellan Province; CT, Circumtropical; T, Transpacific; AN, Anfiamerican). Rearranged in a gradient from north to south.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Latitudinal trend in family (a, b), genus (c) and species richness (mean±SD for cruise) (d) of fish of the five ecosystems. A: Upper Gulf of California; B: Sinaloa-Nayarit; C: Jalisco-Colima; D: Michoacán-Guerrero, and E: Gulf of Tehuantepec.

Figure 4

Table 2. Taxonomic composition of the five ecosystems.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Relationship between the average taxonomic distinctness index (A) and the variation in taxonomic distinctness (B) vs the species richness of the five ecosystems (Upper Gulf of California: ▲; Sinaloa-Nayarit: ◇; Jalisco-Colima: ○; Michoacán-Guerrero: *; Gulf of Tehuantepec: ●). The average (dotted line) and confidence intervals of 95% (solid lines) are shown for 999 random permutations of pairs from the list of species.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Dendrogram of similarity of the fish community of the five ecosystems, ordered from north to south (Upper Gulf of California: ▲; Sinaloa-Nayarit: ◇; Jalisco-Colima: ○; Michoacán-Guerrero: *; Gulf of Tehuantepec: ●) calculated with the Bray–Curtis similarity coefficient.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). The distances represent the ranks of the dissimilarities among the five ecosystems (Upper Gulf of California: ▲; Sinaloa-Nayarit: ◇; Jalisco-Colima: ○; Michoacán-Guerrero: *; Gulf of Tehuantepec: ●) in two dimensions with a low factor stress of 0.1. The ellipses represent the per cent similarity calculated with the Bray–Curtis similarity coefficient (Black = 50%, Grey = 60%).

Supplementary material: File

Palacios-Salgado Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Download Palacios-Salgado Supplementary Material(File)
File 96.4 KB