Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:57:15.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compact multiband printed-IFA on electromagnetic band-gap structures for wireless applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2013

Dalia M. Elsheakh*
Affiliation:
Microstrip Department, Electronics Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. Phone: +(202)33310513
Esmat A. Abdallah
Affiliation:
Microstrip Department, Electronics Research Institute, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. Phone: +(202)33310513
*
Corresponding author: D. M. Elsheakh Email: daliaelsheakh@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fourth generation mobiles require multi-standard operating handsets with small physical size as well as increasing demand for higher data rates. Compact multi-band printed inverted-F antennas (IFA) for available wireless communications are proposed in this paper. New design of printed IFA based on uniplanar compact electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structure concept is proposed. A printed-IFA with L-load shaped over an artificial ground plane is designed as the main antenna to cover most wireless applications such as GSM, LTE, UMTS, Bluetooth, Wimax, and WLAN. The multi-band is created by means of an EBG structure that is used as a ground plane. Different shapes of uniplanar EBG such as ring, split ring resonator, and spiral rather than mushroom-like structure are investigated. The proposed antenna is built on the uniplanar EBG ground plane with size of 35 × 45 mm2, which is suitable for most of the mobile devices.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Configuration of (a) conventional IFA, (b) L-loaded IFA, and (c) meandered L-loaded IFA.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated |S11| of the design antenna procedures with conventional ground.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Different unit cell shapes of EBG ground plane mushroom, SRR, ring, and spiral.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Different shapes of EBG structures (a) mushroom, (b) SRR (c) ring, and (d) spiral.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The transmission response for EBG ground, mushroom, SRR, ring, and spiral.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Printed meander L-loaded IFA with different EBG configurations (a) SRR, (b) ring, and (c) spiral.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. |S11 | of the printed IFA antenna on different uniplanar EBG ground plane shapes.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. |S11 | of the printed L-loaded IFA antenna on different uniplanar EBG ground plane shapes.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Comparison of| S11 | of the printed meandered L-loaded IFA antenna on different uniplanar EBG ground plane shapes.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Comparison between measured and simulated |S11| of L-loaded IFA antenna with and without meandered shape on ring EBG ground plane.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Comparison between measured and simulated |S11| of meandered L-loaded IFA antenna with and without meandered shape on spiral EBG ground plane.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Simulated antenna gain for the meandered L-loaded printed IFA with and without EBG ground plane.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Fabricated antennas, top layer: (a) L-printed-IFA, (b) meander loaded printed IFA, bottom layers: (c) ring-EBG ground plane, and (d) spiral-EBG ground plane.

Figure 13

Table 1. Simulated antenna parameters.

Figure 14

Table 2. Simulated radiation patterns, antenna with conventional ground , antenna with ring EBG ground , and Spiral EBG ground . Axes are shown in Fig. 1.