Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T08:48:56.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Irreducible water saturation in snow: experimental results in a cold laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Cécile Coléou
Affiliation:
Centre d'Études de la Neige, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Météo-France, 38406 Saint-Martin-d'Hères Cedex, France
Bernard Lesaffre
Affiliation:
Centre d'Études de la Neige, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Météo-France, 38406 Saint-Martin-d'Hères Cedex, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The porosity of wet snow is often about 50%; however, liquid water generally fills less than 10% of this pore volume. In order to relate the irreducible water content trapped in snow to its characteristics, we have conducted experiments in a cold laboratory. The results show that irreducible water content, expressed as per cent of mass, depends only on porosity. Experimental studies were restricted to homogeneous wet snow samples. Therefore, we can only achieve a valid result in natural snowpacks when applying to an homogeneous layer of wet snow. Nevertheless, the results may be incorporated into snow-cover energy-balance models to improve the retention and percolation predictions. The thickness of the water-saturated layer observed at the base of the sample in our experiments, was related to the ratio of the mean convex radius of curvature to dry density.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1998
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Description of sample preparation: soaking a snow sample (1), siphoning (2) and storage at 0°C to allow drainage (3).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. A typical snow sample after soaking and draining. Irreducible liquid-water content was measured in the upper layer.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Snow grains from each sample, before (dry) and after (wet) soaking. The distance between the two light black lines is 0.2 mm.

Figure 3

Table 1. Table of measurements for each sample, m.c.r. is the mean convex radius of the grains

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Irreducible liquid-water content vs P / (1 − P) for all experiments. The symbol shape represents the grain shape before wetting; the symbol size is related to the wet-grain size.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Thickness of saturated layer vs the ratio of mean convex radius to dry density for each sample.