Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T05:26:14.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geophysical studies of floating ice by remote sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

W. J. Campbell
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, Washington 98416, U.S.A.
W. F. Weeks
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, U.S.A.
R. O. Ramseier
Affiliation:
Department of the Environment, 562 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E7, Canada
P. Gloersen
Affiliation:
NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of recent remote-sensing techniques as applied to geophysical studies of floating ice. The current increase in scientific interest in floating ice has occurred during a time of rapid evolution of both remote-sensing platforms and sensors. Mesoscale and macroscale studies of floating ice are discussed under three sensor categories: visual, passive microwave, and active microwave. The specific studies that are reviewed primarily investigate ice drift and deformation, and ice type and ice roughness identification and distribution.

Résumé

Résumé

Cette étude présente une revue des techniques récentes de télédétection dans leurs applications aux recherches sur la glace flottante. Le développement actuel de l’intérêt scientifique porté aux glaces flottantes a coïncidé avec une période de rapide évolution tant des capteurs que des porteurs en télédétection. Les éludes à moyenne et grande échelle des glaces flottantes sont discutées au regard de trois catégories de capteurs: visuels, passifs à courtes longueurs d’onde, actifs à courtes longueurs d’onde. Les études spécifiques qui sont inventoriées en premier lieu concernent la dérive et la déformation des glaces, l’identification et la distribution des types de glace et des rugosités de ces glaces.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag wird ein Überblick über den Einsatz neuerer Fernerkundungsverfahren bei geophysikalischen Untersuchungen von Treibeis gegeben. Die Zunahme des wissenschaftlichen Interesses an Treibeis fällt mit der raschen Weiterentwicklung von Fluggeräten und Sensoren der Fernerkundung zusammen. Untersuchungen mittleren und grossen Masstabs von schwimmendem Eis werden im Hinblick auf drei Sensoren-gruppen diskutiert: sichtbarer Bereich, passive und aktive Mikrowellen. Die hier betrachteten Studien sind hauptsächlich sowohl auf die Eisbewegung und -deformation als auch auf die Identifizierung und Verteilung des Typs und der Rauhigkeit des Eises gerichtet.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1975
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Enlarged portions of ERTS-1 images 1239-21461-7 and 1242-22032-7, showing the old fracture patterns that were utilized in specifying strain-array points (Crowder and others, 1974). The first image (a) was obtained on 19 March 1973 end the second (b) on 22 March 1973. The width of each image is 34 km.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.ERTS-1 multispectral image 1242-22032-7 (Band 7) taken 22 March 1973, showing the deformation of the off-shore pack near Barrow, Alaska (Crowder and others, 1974; Hibler and others, in press).

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Ice drift displacement vectors as determined from sequential ERTS imagery for the time interval 6-7 March in the vicinity of the Bering Strait. Each vector represents a change in position of either an individual floe or a recognizable point on a larger ice mass. The scale of the vectors is the same as the map scale. The general ice motion is always toward the south. The dotted line indicates the edge of the fast ice (Shapiro and Burns, in press).

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Ice drift vector mop of the eastern Beaufort Sea, 24-28 July 1973, and Amundsen Gulf, 12-16 July 1973 (Ramseier and others, in press).

Figure 4

Fig. 5.Visual imagery obtained by lite Defense Meteorological Satellite Program over Bering Sea—Bering Strait-Chukchi Sea region during the BESEX remote-sensing experiment, 18 February 1973. Note that the wind direction is from the north-east as revealed by the roll vortex clouds. This has produced large “open water—thin ice” areas to the lee of the Chukotsky and Seward Peninsulas and Saint Lawrence Island.

Figure 5

Fig. 6.Hand-held Hasselblad photograph of the Gulf of St. Lawrence taken from Skylab-4 on 20 January 1974. Note the shift in the fracture patterns around Anticosti Island mid the continuous shore lead along the south coast of Quebec (Campbell and others, in press [b]).

Figure 6

Fig. 8.Ice motion as deduced from studies of the sequential microwave mosaics as shown in Figure 7 (Campbell and others, in press [a].

Figure 7

Fig. 10.Near minimum and near maximum Arctic sea ice boundaries for 1973 based on ESMR imagery (Gloersen and others, 1974[a]).

Figure 8

Fig. 14.SLR image of the Wainwright—Icy Cape portion of the north coast of Alaska (top of picture is south) taken 28 April 1974. The ice areas producing bright returns correspond either to ridges or rubble fields. Newly formed leads (covered with skim ice) are shown by their low return and characteristic pattern

Figure 9

Fig. 15.SLR image of the same area shown in Figure 14 but taken three days later (1 April 1974). Note the striking change in lead configuration