Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:21:11.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lane dynamics in pair-ion plasmas: effect of obstacle and geometric aspect ratio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

Swati Baruah*
Affiliation:
The Assam Kaziranga University, Jorhat-785 006, Assam, India
Vishal K. Prajapati
Affiliation:
The Assam Kaziranga University, Jorhat-785 006, Assam, India
R. Ganesh
Affiliation:
Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar 382428, Gujarat, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: baruah.s1@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lane formation dynamics of driven two-dimensional pair-ion plasmas is investigated in under-damped cases where the effect of particle inertia cannot be neglected. Extensive Langevin dynamics simulations using an OpenMP parallel program are carried out to analyse the effect of obstacle and geometric aspect ratio on lane formation dynamics previously reported in Sarma et al. (Phys. Plasmas, vol. 27, 2020, 012106) and Baruah et al. (J. Plasma Phys., vol. 87, 2021, 905870202). Lanes are found to form when like particles move along or opposite to the applied field direction. Lane order parameter, cumulative order parameter and distribution of the order parameter have been implemented to detect phase transition. The effect of geometric aspect ratio on the stability of lanes is systematically determined in both the presence and absence of an obstacle. Here, a specular reflective boundary condition is implemented to mimic an obstacle. We demonstrate that an obstacle promotes the merging of lanes, and the system gradually transitions to a partially mixed phase with higher value of aspect ratio. The occurrence of lane mixing phenomena at the separation boundary of two oppositely flowing lanes at higher value of aspect ratio is observed. In the presence of an oscillatory electric field, the lane merging tendency is reduced to a large extent as compared to the system where a constant electric field is applied. Furthermore, in the presence of both space- and time-varying electric fields, an appearance of a void is observed on either side of the obstacle. The study finds that the presence of an external magnetic field promotes acceleration of the phase transition process towards the lane mixing phase; it also reveals the existence of electric field drift in the system. Our findings may prove to be useful in understanding the nature of lane dynamics in naturally occurring pair-ion plasma systems as well as their relevance to technological applications that exploit or mitigate self-organization.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. A schematic illustrating specular reflection of particles from an ‘obstacle’ placed in the centre of the simulation domain.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Typical simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system with constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) in the absence of an obstacle are plotted by taking aspect ratio values $L_{y}=L_{x}$, $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The snapshots are recorded at time $t\omega _{pd}=6000$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$. Here, the external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ is applied along the $Y$ direction.

Figure 2

Figure 3. The $Y$-averaged charge profile $\bar {Q}(x,t)$ is plotted corresponding to the instantaneous particle snapshots recorded at $t\omega _{pd}=6000$ as shown in figure 2. The $\bar {Q}(x,t)$ profile is plotted of the 2-D PIP system for constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) in the absence of the obstacle taking aspect ratio values $L_{y}/L_{x}=1, 3, 7, 10, 20$ and $30$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ of the 2-D PIP system for constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) in the absence of the obstacle is plotted by taking aspect ratio values $L_{y}=L_{x}$, $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Typical simulation snapshot of instantaneous particle positions of the 2-D PIP system without the obstacle and in the presence of constant ($\omega =0$) external electric field is plotted. The snapshot shows the breaking of lanes (as indicated by the three circles) due to the friction at the interface between oppositely driven PIP particles. Aspect ratio value used is $L_{y}=9L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\kappa =0.0001$, $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Occurrence distribution function of $\phi$ (or $f(\phi )$) versus instantaneous order parameter $\phi$ of the 2-D PIP system for constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) in the absence of the obstacle is plotted by taking aspect ratio values $L_{y}=L_{x}$, $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$. This figure helps in clarifying the ordering in the PIP system.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Occurrence distribution function of $\phi$ ($f(\phi )$) is calculated for different geometric aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$ and (d) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$, after turning on the external electric field at $t\omega _{pd}=600$ simulation time step. The area under each curve is recorded for various simulation time zones of the 2-D PIP system for constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) in the absence of the obstacle. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Cumulative order parameter $\phi ^{\prime }$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ plots of the 2-D PIP system for constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) in the absence of the obstacle. The aspect ratio values used are (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (d) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (e) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (f) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 8

Figure 9. (a) Typical simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system with constant external electric field ($\omega = 0$) in the presence of the obstacle are plotted by taking aspect ratio values (i) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (ii) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (iii) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (iv) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (v) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (vi) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The snapshots are recorded at time $t\omega _{pd}=6000$. (b) The corresponding order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ plots. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$. Here, the external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ is applied along the $Y$ direction.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Cumulative order parameter $\phi ^{\prime }$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ plots of the 2-D PIP system for constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) in the presence of the obstacle. The aspect ratio values used are (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (d) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (e) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (f) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Occurrence distribution function of $\phi$ (or $f(\phi )$) versus instantaneous order parameter $\phi$ of the 2-D PIP system for constant ($\omega =0$) external electric field in the presence of the obstacle is plotted by taking aspect ratio values $L_{y}=L_{x}$, $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Occurrence distribution function of $\phi$ ($f(\phi )$) calculated for different geometric aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}= L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}= 7L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}= 10L_{x}$ and (d) $L_{y}= 20L_{x}$, after turning on the external electric field at $t\omega _{pd}=600$ simulation time step. The area under each curve is recorded for various simulation time zones of the 2-D PIP system for constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) in presence of the obstacle. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$, $\rho = 1.0$.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Typical simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system with constant external electric field ($\omega = 0$) in the presence of the obstacle are plotted by taking $\gamma =7, 10$ and $20$, with aspect ratio value $L_{y}=L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$. Here, the external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ is applied along the $Y$ direction.

Figure 13

Figure 14. Comparative order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ of the 2-D PIP system for constant ($\omega = 0$) external electric field in both the presence and absence of the obstacle is plotted by taking aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (d) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (e) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (f) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 14

Figure 15. Comparative plots of occurrence distribution function of $\phi$ (or $f(\phi )$) versus instantaneous order parameter $\phi$ of the 2-D PIP system for constant ($\omega = 0$) external electric field in both the presence and absence of the obstacle taking aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (d) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (e) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (f) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 15

Figure 16. Typical comparative simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system with constant ($\omega = 0$) external electric field in both the presence and absence of the obstacle are plotted by taking aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, and (c) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$. Here, the external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ is applied along the $Y$ direction.

Figure 16

Figure 17. Comparative plot of order parameter $\phi$ versus aspect ratio $L_{y}/L_{x}$ of the 2-D PIP system with constant ($\omega = 0$) external electric field in both the presence and absence of the obstacle. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$.

Figure 17

Figure 18. Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ of the 2-D PIP system for oscillatory external electric field ($\omega \neq 0$) in the absence of the obstacle is plotted by taking aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (d) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (e) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (f) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$, $\omega =0.001, 0.01$.

Figure 18

Figure 19. Typical simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system with oscillatory external electric field ($\omega \neq 0$) in the absence of the obstacle are plotted by taking aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (d) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (e) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (f) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$, $\omega =0.01$. Here, the external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ is applied along the $Y$ direction.

Figure 19

Figure 20. Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ of the 2-D PIP system for oscillatory external electric field ($\omega \neq 0$) in the presence of the obstacle is plotted by taking aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (d) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (e) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (f) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$, $E_{0}=150$, $\omega =0.001, 0.01$.

Figure 20

Figure 21. Typical simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system with oscillatory external electric field ($\omega =0.01$) in the presence of the obstacle are plotted by taking aspect ratio values (a) $L_{y}=L_{x}$, (b) $L_{y}=3L_{x}$, (c) $L_{y}=7L_{x}$, (d) $L_{y}=10L_{x}$, (e) $L_{y}=20L_{x}$ and (f) $L_{y}=30L_{x}$. The other parameters used are $E=150$, $\varGamma =2.5$. Here, the external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ is applied along the $Y$ direction.

Figure 21

Figure 22. Comparative order parameter $\phi$ versus aspect ratio $L_{y}/L_{x}$ plot of the 2-D PIP system in both the presence and absence of external magnetic field with obstacle. The other parameters used are $\beta =0.1$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$, $\omega =0$.

Figure 22

Figure 23. (a) Typical simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system in the presence of constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) with the obstacle are plotted at different simulation time steps. The study is done in the presence of external magnetic field with $\beta =0.1$. Here, the external electric force is applied along the $Y$ direction. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$, $\omega =0.0$. (b) Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ plot of the 2-D PIP system with constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) with the obstacle. The snapshots recorded at different simulation times are shown in figure 21. The study is done in the presence of external magnetic field with $\beta =0.1$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$, $\omega =0$.

Figure 23

Figure 24. (a) Typical simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system in the presence of constant external electric field ($\omega =0$) with obstacle are plotted at different simulation time steps. To denote a lane consisting of positive (red-coloured) PIP particles, two blue dashed lines are used and instantaneous positions of that particular lane with time are noted, which indicates the presence of $E \times B$ drift. (b) Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{pd}$ plot corresponding to (a). The right-hand panel is a zoomed plot from $t\omega _{pd}=2500$ to $3500$. The snapshots recorded at different simulation times are shown in (a). The study is done in the presence of the external magnetic field with $\beta =0.1$. Here, the external electric force is applied along the $Y$ direction. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$, $\omega =0$.

Figure 24

Figure 25. The $Y$-averaged charge profile $\bar {Q}(x)$ is plotted corresponding to the instantaneous particle snapshots recorded in figure 24(a), at (a) $t\omega _{pd}=2802$, (b) $t\omega _{pd}=2832$, (c) $t\omega _{pd}=2873$, (d) $t\omega _{pd}=2897$, (e) $t\omega _{pd}=2938$ and (f) $t\omega _{pd}=2999$. The parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=150$, $\omega =0$, $\beta =0.1$ and $L_{y}/L_{x}=3$.