Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:39:15.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The anthelmintic efficacy of natural plant cysteine proteinases against Hymenolepis microstoma in vivo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2014

F. Mansur
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UKFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
W. Luoga
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UKDepartment of Life Sciences, Mkwawa University College of Education, Iringa, Tanzania
D.J. Buttle
Affiliation:
Department of Infection and Immunity, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
I.R. Duce
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
A. Lowe
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
J.M. Behnke*
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
*
*Fax: 44 115 951 3251 E-mail: jerzy.behnke@nottingham.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Little is known about the efficacy of cysteine proteinases (CP) as anthelmintics for cestode infections in vivo. Hymenolepis microstoma is a natural parasite of house mice, and provides a convenient model system for the assessment of novel drugs for anthelmintic activity against cestodes. The experiments described in this paper indicate that treatment of H. microstoma infections in mice with the supernatant of papaya latex (PLS), containing active cysteine proteinases, is only minimally efficacious. The statistically significant effects seen on worm burden and biomass showed little evidence of dose dependency, were temporary and the role of cysteine proteinases as the active principles in PLS was not confirmed by specific inhibition with E-64. Worm fecundity was not affected by treatment at the doses used. We conclude also that this in vivo host–parasite system is not sensitive enough to be used reliably for the detection of cestocidal activity of compounds being screened as potential, novel anthelmintics.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1Effect of papaya latex supernatant extract (PLS) on H. microstoma in vivo (Experiment 1). (A) The mean log10 of eggs per gram of faeces before (days 22–26) and during (days 28–32) treatment (arrows) of C3H mice infected with H. microstoma with PLS (▲; n= 9) or water (○; n= 9). (B) Mean worm burden of C3H mice infected with H. microstoma and treated with 240 nmol PLS (n= 9, stippled columns) or water (n= 9, open columns). (C) Mean wet biomass and (D) mean dry biomass. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 1

Fig. 2Involvement of cysteine proteinases in PLS (Experiment 3). C3H mice were infected with H. microstoma and treated either with PLS 240 nmol, PLS 240 nmol pre-treated with 280 nmol E-64 before administration to mice, E-64 280 nmol or water (n= 5 mice for each treatment). (A) Mean worm burden; (B) mean wet biomass; (C) mean dry biomass. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 2

Fig. 3Scanning electron microscopical observations of surface changes to worms in PLS-treated animals (Experiment 4). SEM images of detached proglottid segments of H. microstoma recovered from the colons of infected mice treated with (A) PLS 240 nmol; (B) PLS 240 nmol pre-treated with 280 nmol E-64; (C) E-64 280 nmol; (D) water. Note the erosions in (A) revealing internal structure of the worm, shown at increased magnification ( × 200) in the insert, and the otherwise smooth appearance of other segments.

Figure 3

Fig. 4Dose dependency of the effect of PLS on H. microstoma (Experiment 4). The relationship between increasing PLS dose and worm burden (A), wet biomass (B); and dry biomass (C). All groups were of the same sample size (n= 3) except groups 1 and 5 (n= 5). For statistical analyses and further details of experimental design see text. The line of best fit is provided.

Figure 4

Fig. 5The effect of PLS on H. microstoma 1 week after treatment (Experiment 6). C3H mice were infected with H. microstoma and culled immediately after 6 days of treatment with either 240 nmol of PLS or water (n= 5 mice for both treatments) and a further 1 week after withholding treatment (n= 5 for both treatments). (A) Mean worm burden; (B) mean wet biomass; (C) mean dry biomass. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 5

Fig. 6Effects of PLS on pre-patent, migratory stages of H. microstoma (Experiment 7). C3H mice were infected with H. microstoma and treated with PLS 240 nmol (n= 9) or water (n= 9). (A) Mean worm burden; (B) mean wet biomass; (C) mean dry biomass. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.