Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T05:00:41.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF RICHARD LYNN'S REPORTS ON REACTION TIME AND RACE – Erratum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , May 2011, pp. 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Thomas, D. M. (2011) A critical review of Richard Lynn's reports on reaction time and race. Journal of Biosocial Science 43(1), 113–123.

Page 120, lines 27–29, should read:

… insignificant differences are those for which the pairwise mean difference's confidence interval included zero, and significant differences are those for which the confidence interval excluded zero.

References

Thomas, D. M. (2011) A critical review of Richard Lynn's reports on reaction time and race. Journal of Biosocial Science 43(1), 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar