Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T03:54:03.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glaciation, erosion and the evolution of the Transantarctic Mountains, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew Kerr
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Scotland
Alan Gilchrist
Affiliation:
Costal Mountain Consultants, 3504 Gorden Drive, Terrace, BC V8G 5P5, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Modelling studies of the tectonic evolution of the Transantarctic Mountains in Antarctica have drawn differing conclusions as to the primary mechanisms involved. None has considered the role of the East Antarctic ice sheet in detail. We use a denudation—flexural model to examine the isostatic response of the continental margin to glacial erosion to determine whether glacial processes have played a role in forcing mountain uplift.

The conclusion is that, although there are insufficient data formally to delimit the role of glacial erosion, available geophysical and geomorphological data are not inconsistent with the results of the differential denudation model, providing certain conditions are met. These results indicate that the current topography of the Transantarctic Mountains can be simulated, in part, from the isostatic response of the lithosphere to glacial erosion. The short wavelength and high amplitude of the Transantarctic Mountains do not require a low flexural rigidity in the unrated lithosphere, provided there is a fast escarpment retreat from the rift hinge, high escarpment denudation rates and a large differential in denudation between the coastal zone and the interior.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1996
Figure 0

Fig. 1.A schematic diagram outlining the geometry of the model. Parameters are required for the rate of escarpment retreat and the denudation in the coastal zone, the hinterland and on the escarpment.

Figure 1

Table 1.The input parameters to the model

Figure 2

Fig. 2.The evolution of the continental margin and the development of a mountain escarpment resulting from a combination of lithospheric flexure and accumulative denudation, from 60 Ma to the present (0 Ma).

Figure 3

Fig. 3.The evolution of the lithospheric flexure caused by denudational unloading at the continental margin, from 60 Ma to the present (0 Ma).

Figure 4

Fig. 4.The evolution of the accumulative denudation across the continental margin, which is constrained by fission-track data, from 60 Ma to the present (0 Ma).

Figure 5

Fig. 5.A comparison between the modelled topography and a schematic profile of the present Transantarctic Mountains in the Dry Valleys area. Of note are the maximum elevation of the topography and the flexural wavelength rather than the quality of fit.

Figure 6

Table 2.The effect of varying the input parameters by ± 50% on the maximum elevation of the accumulative denudation, the lithospheric flexure and the topography. This is one of two possible measures, the second being the flexural wavelength: qualitatively, the results are similar

Figure 7

Fig. 6.A comparison between the modelled topography, assuming different initial topographic elevations, and a schematic profile of the present Transantarctic Mountains in the Dry Valleys area. An initial topographic elevation of 1200 m leads to a high hinterland; an initial elevation of 500 m leads to a low mountain escarpment; an initial elevation of 1200 m at the coast and 500 m in the hinterland produces a relatively good fit. Since the initial elevation is unknown, the implication is that we cannot delimit the role of differential denudation in forcing mountain uplift.