Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T22:57:48.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New constraints on the last deglaciation of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet in coastal Southeast Alaska

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2020

Alia J. Lesnek*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14209, USA
Jason P. Briner
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14209, USA
James F. Baichtal
Affiliation:
Tongass National Forest, Thorne Bay, AK99919, USA
Alex S. Lyles
Affiliation:
Tongass National Forest, Thorne Bay, AK99919, USA
*
*Corresponding author at: University of New Hampshire, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham, NH03824, USA. E-mail: alia.lesnek@unh.edu (Alia Lesnek)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding marine-terminating ice sheet response to past climate transitions provides valuable long-term context for observations of modern ice sheet change. Here, we reconstruct the last deglaciation of marine-terminating Cordilleran Ice Sheet (CIS) margins in Southeast Alaska and explore potential forcings of western CIS retreat. We combine 27 new cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages, 13 recently published 10Be ages, and 25 new 14C ages from raised marine sediments to constrain CIS recession. Retreat from the outer coast was underway by 17 ka, and the inner fjords and sounds were ice-free by 15 ka. After 15 ka, the western margin of the CIS became primarily land-terminating and alpine glaciers disappeared from the outer coast. Isolated alpine glaciers may have persisted in high inland peaks until the early Holocene. Our results suggest that the most rapid phase of CIS retreat along the Pacific coast occurred between ~17 and 15 ka. This retreat was likely driven by processes operating at the ice-ocean interface, including sea level rise and ocean warming. CIS recession after ~15 ka occurred during a time of climatic amelioration in this region, when both ocean and air temperatures increased. These data highlight the sensitivity of marine-terminating CIS regions to deglacial climate change.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2020
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the Cordilleran and Laurentide ice sheets with locations of relevant chronologies. Study area in Southeast Alaska is indicated by the black box. The approximate location and direction of the Alaska Current (Weingartner et al., 2005) is shown by the red arrows. Shaded light blue areas are ice sheet extents at ~17.3 cal ka BP (Dyke, 2004). Black dots indicate locations of marine sediment cores: SO202-27-6 (Maier et al., 2018), EW0408-85JC (Davies et al., 2011; Praetorius and Mix, 2014; Praetorius et al., 2015), EW0408-22JC (Praetorius et al., 2016), and MD02-2946 (Cosma and Hendy, 2008; Hendy and Cosma, 2008; Taylor et al., 2014). Yellow dots indicate locations of terrestrial CIS chronology: APGC = Alaska Peninsula Glacier Complex (Misarti et al., 2012), Kodiak Island (Mann and Peteet, 1994), Mt. Logan (Fisher et al., 2008), Haida Gwaii (Clague et al., 1982; Mathewes and Clague, 2017), and Calvert Island (Darvill et al., 2018). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 1

Figure 2. Map of study area. 10Be sampling sites are indicated by the dots. Sites are color coded, where yellow = western region, purple = Baker Island (local glaciers), blue = central region, and black = eastern region. 14C sampling locations are indicated by squares. Green = Shuká Káa cave (Lesnek et al., 2018), pink = shell-bearing raised marine sediments. White stars indicate locations of previous work mentioned in the text. HL = Hummingbird Lake (Ager et al., 2019), EC = El Capitan Cave (Wilcox et al., 2019). Modern glacier extents (white) are from version 6 of the Randolph Glacier Inventory (NSIDC, 2005, updated 2018). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 2

Figure 3. (color online) Examples of surfaces sampled for 10Be dating. 10Be ages are shown at 1 SD internal uncertainty. See online supplemental information for photographs of all samples.

Figure 3

Table 1. 10Be age information.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (color online) Samples with 10Be ages that are potentially impacted by snow shielding. Photos were taken during field work in July 2017. All 10Be ages are shown at 1 SD internal uncertainty. (A) Boulder from Zarembo Island. The boulder surface is lichen-covered, but the boulder is less than 1 m in height. (B) Boulder from the Katete River site. Note the largely lichen-free surface and snow field in the background. Sample is ~3 m above the snow surface. (C–D) Boulders from the Bradfield River site. The boulders are large and appear to be stable, but the lack of lichen on their surfaces may be indicative of seasonal snow cover. Samples are ~4 m above the snowfield surface.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (color online) Representative raised marine sediments and samples for 14C dating. (A) Shells embedded in raised marine sediments on Mitkof Island. (B) Marine sediments on Wrangell Island. (C) Section of raised marine sediments from Kupreanof Island. (D) Shells from Gravina Island. (E) Section of raised marine sediments on Revillagigedo Island.

Figure 6

Table 2. 14C age information.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Map of Southeast Alaska with deglaciation chronology. Ages are color coded by type and region.14C ages from Shuká Káa (Lesnek et al., 2018) are shown in green boxes with white text. Minimum-limiting 14C ages from raised marine sediments are shown in pink boxes with white text. All 14C ages are calibrated and shown at 2 SD uncertainty. 10Be ages from this study are shown in white boxes with black text. Previously published 10Be ages (Lesnek et al., 2018) are indicated with gray text. Boulder ages are in bold text, bedrock ages are in normal text. All 10Be ages are color coded by region: yellow = western region, purple = Baker Island (local glaciers), blue = central region, and black = eastern region. Outliers are indicated by italic text. All 10Be ages are shown at 1 SD external uncertainty. Average 10Be ages for each region (mean ± 1 SD) are shown at the top of the image. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 8

Figure 7. (color online) Normalized kernel density estimates for 10Be ages in the western region of the study area. All 10Be ages are plotted with 1 SD internal uncertainty. In the bottom panel, all ages from the western region are summed, and the average age for the western region group excludes three outliers (two young outliers, one old outlier that is not pictured) that were 2 SD outside of the mean.

Figure 9

Figure 8. (color online) Normalized kernel density estimates for 10Be ages in the central region of the study area. All 10Be ages are plotted with 1 SD internal uncertainty. In the bottom panel, all ages from the central region are summed, and the average age for the central region excludes three young outliers.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Normalized kernel density estimates for 10Be ages in the eastern region of the study area. In the bottom panel, all ages from the eastern region are summed, and the average age for the eastern region excludes six young outliers.

Figure 11

Figure 10. (color online) Normalized kernel density estimates for 10Be ages in all regions in the study area, including Baker Island.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Map of inferred CIS maximum extent (~20-17 ka) and flow direction during the latest Pleistocene. CIS extent (white lines and shading) is updated from Carrara et al. (2007) and inferred from 10Be ages in the western region of the study area and bathymetry. Ice-free refugia may have existed on Baranof, Coronation, Noyes, Baker, and Forrester islands (red text). Black arrows represent average ice flow based on groups of at least five directional indicators, such as striations, drumlins, and crag and tails. For additional details on the ice flow indicators, we direct the reader to the online supplementary information. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 13

Figure 12. Glacial and climate history of the Pacific coast. (A) GISP2 δ18O (Grootes and Stuiver, 1997). (B) Global eustatic sea level stack (Spratt and Lisiecki, 2016). (C) Gulf of Alaska surface δ18O from marine sediment core SO202-27-6, which relates to salinity (Maier et al., 2018). (D) Sea surface temperatures derived from alkenones in marine sediment core EW0408-85JC (Praetorius et al., 2015). (E) Surface (light blue dotted line) and subsurface (dark blue solid line) ocean temperatures derived from Mg/Ca ratios in foraminifera in marine sediment core MD02-2946 (Taylor et al., 2014). (F) Time distance diagrams for the marine-terminating CIS margin in coastal Southeast Alaska. Circles represent average 10Be ages plotted against distance from the CIS maximum extent, color coded by group. Triangles are 14C ages; green triangles are 14C ages on ringed seal bones in Shuká Káa (Lesnek et al., 2018), pink triangles are on shells in raised marine sediments (this study). (G) Ice-rafted debris in marine sediment core MD02-2946, offshore Vancouver Island (Cosma and Hendy, 2008). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Supplementary material: File

Lesnek et al. supplementary material

Lesnek et al. supplementary material

Download Lesnek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 244.3 KB