Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:45:19.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic variation in leaf photosynthesis and associated traits in elite and landrace-derived genotypes in wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2024

Shadia H. S. Kareem
Affiliation:
Division of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, UK Department of Biotechnology and Crop Science, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq
Jayalath De Silva
Affiliation:
Division of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, UK
Minuka Weerasinghe
Affiliation:
Division of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, UK
Malcolm J. Hawkesford
Affiliation:
Department Sustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK
Simon Griffiths
Affiliation:
Department Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK
Phil Howell
Affiliation:
Department Crop Genetic Resources, National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), Cambridge, UK
M. John Foulkes*
Affiliation:
Division of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, UK
*
Corresponding author: M. John Foulkes; Email: John.Foulkes@nottingham.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is an increasing emphasis worldwide on breeding wheat cultivars with higher biomass and grain yield, whilst reducing excessive input of N fertilizers. Modern plant breeding has narrowed the genetic base of bread wheat, so exploring new sources of genetic variation for leaf photosynthesis traits and biomass to underpin grain yield improvement has become necessary. Our objectives were to quantify the genetic variability in a range of landrace-derived lines and elite bread wheat genotypes in flag-leaf photosynthesis traits, biomass and N-use efficiency for potential application in pre-breeding. Sixteen bread wheat genotypes including elite spring wheat cultivar Paragon × landrace crosses were tested in two field experiments in the UK. Averaging across years, pre-anthesis flag-leaf photosynthesis rate ranged amongst genotypes from 26.0 to 31.5 μmol/m2/s (P < 0.001) and post-anthesis from 14.2 to 18.6 μmol/m2/s (P < 0.001). Two landrace-derived lines had greater post-anthesis flag-leaf photosynthesis rate (P < 0.001) than their elite parent Paragon. There was a trend for a positive correlation among genotypes between post-anthesis flag-leaf photosynthesis rate and biomass (r = 0.47, P = 0.06). Two landrace derivatives showed higher post-anthesis flag-leaf stomatal conductance than Paragon. Our results indicated that introgression of traits from wider germplasm into elite UK modern wheat germplasm offers scope to raise flag-leaf photosynthetic rate and biomass.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Wheat genotypes used in the field experiments

Figure 1

Table 2. Plant height and days to anthesis (GS61) for the 16 wheat genotypes

Figure 2

Figure 1. Linear regression of grain yield (100% DM) on (a) anthesis date (days after sowing, DAS); (b) plant height (cm); (c) above-ground dry matter; (d) harvest index (HI) (e) grains per m2 and (f) thousand grain weight for 16 wheat genotypes (Paragon wheat cultivar ■; single seed descent (SSD) elite derivative ▴; MAGIC lines ♦ and single seed descent landrace derivative •) Values represent means in 2017 and 2017–2018.

Figure 3

Table 3. Grain yield (GY), above-ground dry matter (AGDM), grains per m2, grains per ear, thousand-grain weight (TGW), N uptake, N-utilization efficiency (NUtE), and the onset of flag-leaf post-anthesis senescence (SENONSET) in 16 wheat genotypes (including (Paragon wheat cultivar; single seed descent elite derivatives; MAGIC lines and single seed descent landrace derivatives)

Figure 4

Figure 2. Linear regression of grain yield on (a) N-uptake and (b) N-utilization efficiency for 16 wheat genotypes. Values are means of 2017 and 2017–18) (Paragon wheat cultivar ■; single seed descent (SSD) elite derivative ▴; MAGIC lines ♦ and single seed descent (SSD) landrace derivative •). For genotype codes see Table 1.

Figure 5

Table 4. Flag-leaf photosynthetic rate (Amax), stomatal conductance (gs) at pre-anthesis and post-anthesis of 16 genotypes (Paragon wheat cultivar; single seed descent (SSD) elite derivatives; MAGIC lines and SSD landrace derivatives) in 2017 and 2017–18

Figure 6

Figure 3. Linear regression of (a) flag-leaf (Amax) pre-anthesis on flag-leaf relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) at anthesis (GS61) and (b) grain yield on flag-leaf relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) at anthesis (GS61) for 16 wheat genotypes (Paragon wheat cultivar ■; 3 single seed descent (SSD) elite lines ▴; 3 MAGIC lines ♦ and 9 SSD) landrace derivatives •). (Value represents means of 2017–2018). For genotype codes see Table 1.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Linear regression of (a) grain yield (g/m2) on flag-leaf visual senescence onset (SENONSET, °Cd) in 2017; (b) grain yield (g/m2) on flag-leaf visual senescence onset (SENONSET, °Cd) in 2018; and (c) grain yield (g/m2) on flag-leaf visual senescence onset (SENONSET, °Cd) in 2017–2018; for 16 wheat genotypes (Paragon wheat cultivar ■; 3 single seed descent elite derivatives ▴; 3 MAGIC lines ♦ and 9 single seed descent landrace derivatives).

Supplementary material: File

Kareem et al. supplementary material

Kareem et al. supplementary material
Download Kareem et al. supplementary material(File)
File 43.9 KB