Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T05:16:59.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Tantalum on phase stability and mechanical properties of WB2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2019

Christoph Fuger*
Affiliation:
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Application Oriented Coating Development, Institute of Materials Science and Technology, TU Wien, A-1060 Wien, Austria
Vincent Moraes
Affiliation:
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Application Oriented Coating Development, Institute of Materials Science and Technology, TU Wien, A-1060 Wien, Austria
Rainer Hahn
Affiliation:
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Application Oriented Coating Development, Institute of Materials Science and Technology, TU Wien, A-1060 Wien, Austria
Hamid Bolvardi
Affiliation:
Oerlikon Balzers, Oerlikon Surface Solutions AG, FL-9496 Balzers, Liechtenstein
Peter Polcik
Affiliation:
Plansee Composite Materials GmbH, D-86983 Lechbruck am See, Germany
Helmut Riedl
Affiliation:
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Application Oriented Coating Development, Institute of Materials Science and Technology, TU Wien, A-1060 Wien, Austria Institute of Materials Science and Technology, TU Wien, A-1060 Wien, Austria
Paul Heinz Mayrhofer
Affiliation:
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Application Oriented Coating Development, Institute of Materials Science and Technology, TU Wien, A-1060 Wien, Austria Institute of Materials Science and Technology, TU Wien, A-1060 Wien, Austria
*
Address all correspondence to Christoph Fuger at christoph.fuger@tuwien.ac.at

Abstract

Based on density functional theory, we recently suggested that metastable α-WB2 is a promising candidate combining very high hardness with high toughness. These calculations further suggested that the addition of Tantalum supports the crystallization of α-structured W1−xTaxB2−z, with only minor reduction in toughness. Thus, various Ta containing WB2-based coatings have been synthesized using physical vapor deposition. With increasing Ta content, the hardness increases from ~41 GPa (WB2) to ~45 GPa (W0.74Ta0.26B2). In situ micromechanical cantilever bending tests exhibit fracture toughness KIC values of 3.7 to 3.0 MPa√m for increasing Ta content (single-phased up to 26 at.% Ta).

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of W1−xTaxB2−z powders with increasing Ta content (0 < x < 1). The standardized 2θ-peak positions of α-WB2 (a = 3.010 Å, c = 3.050 Å),[25]α-TaB2 (a = 3.098 Å, c = 3.227 Å)[26] and o-TaB (a = 3.2801 Å, b = 8.6708 Å, c = 3.1557 Å)[27] are indicated with green, orange, and blue symbols, respectively.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) B-rich part of the ternary W-Ta-B concentration triangle with indicated chemical compositions (obtained by TOF-ERDA) of the sputtered W1−xTaxB2−z films (red squared data points) and chemical compositions used for the DFT studies (data points with full hexagons [labeled with ωperfect, for defect-free crystals) and data points with open hexagons (labeled with αperfect, for defect-free crystals and $\alpha _{{\rm exp}{\rm. \; comp}{\rm.}} ^{{\rm boron\; def}{\rm.}} $, for B-vacant crystals to meet the experimental chemical compositions) and data points with half-filled hexagons (labeled with $\alpha _{{\rm exp}{\rm. \; comp}{\rm.}} ^{{\rm Schottky}} $, for B-vacant and Schottky-defected crystals to meet the experimental chemical composition)]. (b) Energy of formation (Ef) as a function of the Ta content for defect-free α- and ω-W1−xTaxB2−z lattices as well as for defected α-structures [same labeling of the data points as in (a)].

Figure 2

Figure 3. SEM fracture cross-section of as-deposited (a) WB1.78, (b) W0.93Ta0.07B1.76, (c) W0.86Ta0.14B1.83, and (d) W0.74Ta0.26B1.87 thin films.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Hardness (H), (b) indentation moduli (E), and (c) residual stresses (σ) of our single-phased α-W1−xTaxB2−z coatings with x = 0, 7, 14, 26 at.%. The nanoindentation experiments are conducted on coated sapphire samples, whereas the stresses are obtained by curvature measurements of coated Si substrates.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Critical stress intensity factor (KIC) values determined by micromechanical bending tests of microscopic cantilevers, produced from the coatings. The tests were carried out with the following samples: WB1.78, W0.93Ta0.07B1.76, W0.86Ta0.14B1.83, and W0.74Ta0.26B1.87. Literature values of (Ti,Al)N, CrN/TiN, Ti-Si-N, TiN, and TiB2 are indicated by the blue, orange, purple, red, and green areas and lines, respectively.