Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:51:49.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antiallodynia and antihyperalgesia effects of ceftriaxone in treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2013

Valiollah Hajhashemi
Affiliation:
Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Hossein Hosseinzadeh
Affiliation:
Pharmaceutical Research Center, Pharmacodynamy and Toxicology Department, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR, Iran
Bahareh Amin*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
*
Bahareh Amin, Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Tel: +983117922630; Fax: +983116680011; E-mail: b_amin@pharm.mui.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Neuropathic pain is a chronic and disabling syndrome with complex pathogenesis. It has been suggested that the function of glutamate transporters (GLTs) has a major role in the development of neuropathic pain. This study was performed to evaluate various doses of ceftriaxone, a beta-lactam antibiotic, on the symptoms in the rat chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain. This drug has been recently introduced as a selective up-regulator and activator of GLT1.

Methods

Neuropathy was induced in adult male Wistar rats and animals were treated intraperitoneally with 100–400 mg/kg of ceftriaxone for seven consecutive days immediately after surgery. Gabapentin (100 mg/kg, i.p.) was used as a reference drug. von Frey filaments, acetone drop and radiant heat methods were used to assess mechanical allodynia, thermal allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, respectively.

Results

Ceftriaxone in the repeated doses for 7 days showed significant antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects especially at a dose of 200 mg/kg twice a day.

Conclusion

The results suggest that ceftriaxone as a modulator of glutamate uptake could provide beneficial effects in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain, especially allodynia that is less sensitive to the most available drugs.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2013
Figure 0

Figure 1 The effect of various doses of intraperitoneal administration of ceftriaxone (Cef) on mechanical allodynia caused by CCI surgery on the left sciatic nerve in rats. Groups of n = 6–8 animals were chosen. Values are based on mg/kg of animal weight. Administration of drug was done in day 1 and continued until day 7. Baseline assessment (day 0). Data were analysed by nonparametric statics (Mann–Whitney U-test) and presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus control group (CCI + i.p. NS group).

Figure 1

Figure 2 The effect of various doses of intraperitoneal administration of ceftriaxone (Cef) on thermal allodynia induced by CCI surgery on the left sciatic nerve in rats. Groups of n = 6–8 animals were chosen. Administration of drug was done in day 1 and continued until day 7. Baseline assessment (day 0). Data were analysed using nonparametric statics (Mann–Whitney U-test) and presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus control group (CCI + i.p. NS group).

Figure 2

Figure 3 The effect of various doses of intraperitoneal administration of ceftriaxone (Cef) on thermal hyperalgesia induced by CCI surgery on the left sciatic nerve in rats. Groups of n = 6–8 animals were chosen. Administration of drugs was done in day 1 and continued until day 7. Baseline assessment (day 0). Data are analysed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Scheffe post hoc test and presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus control group (CCI + i.p. NS group).