Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:04:25.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leaf tissue water relations in tree species from contrasting habitats within the upper Rio Negro forests of the Amazon region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

M. A. Sobrado*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Biología Ambiental de Plantas, Departamento de Biología de Organismos, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Apartado 89.000, Caracas 1080 A, Venezuela
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The landscape of the upper Rio Negro basin (North Amazon) exhibits distinctive habitats that are associated with differential soil characteristics and topographical conditions as well as species composition (Herrera et al. 1978). The mixed forests thrive on well-structured oxisols on slightly more elevated areas. The valleys with sandy podzols are occupied by the ‘Amazon caatinga’ complex with three distinct zones: the bottom valley and the gentle slopes, both of which have closed forests, and the sandy domes with open forests (‘bana’ or sclerophyllous forest; Breimer 1985). From the mixed forest towards the caatinga valley-slope-dome habitats, the leaf δ15N signatures become increasingly negative, suggesting a trend in N limitation in the same direction (Sobrado 2010). Thus, negative leaf δ15N signatures depleted in 15N compared with the soil indicate a very tight N cycle in all of the habitats. Water availability follows a similar pattern from the top of the oxisol towards the flooded valley bottom of the caatinga, with extreme water-table fluctuations in the sandy domes (Klinge 1978). Thus, parallel variation in nutrient and water availabilities exist in this area that are associated with soil characteristics and topography. Under such contrasting habitats, species-specific responses would be linked to particular conditions of the habitat at a local scale (Comita & Engelbrecht 2009, Engelbrecht et al. 2007). A number of studies in these habitats have shown that this is the case for soil fertility (Coomes 1997, Medina et al. 1990, Sobrado 2010, Sobrado & Medina 1980). Similarly, the hydraulic characteristics and long-term water use are species specific and related to particular conditions of the habitat at the local scale (Sobrado 2010). In this report, it was hypothesized that the leaf tissue water relations of species thriving in different habitats may reflect the water availability at the particular sites as well. The leaf tissue water relations of species thriving in the extreme nutrient and water-supply conditions of the sandy domes from the caatinga complex have been previously studied in detail (Sobrado 2009a). However, these data are currently not available for the species that thrive in the surrounding area of the closed forests, and importantly, such information would allow for a comparison across habitats. Therefore, the present study assessed the minimum leaf water potential (midday) under field conditions as well as the leaf tissue water relations by using pressure-volume analysis of dominant tree species in the top canopy of these high-stature forests.

Information

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Figure 1. Leaf water potential (Ψ) and osmotic potential (Ψπ) as a function of relative water content (a–d) as well as leaf turgor pressure (Ψp) as a function of leaf water potential (e–h) in two species of the mixed forest (Caryocar glabrum and Ocotea aciphylla) and two species of the Amazon caatinga forest (Eperua leucantha and Micranda sprucei). Plots were derived from six pressure–volume (P–V) curves for each species. Linear regressions are shown with the following equations: Ψ = 0.15 RWC – 14.9 (r = 0.97; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.03 RWC – 4.25 (r = 0.77; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.85 Ψ + 1.17 (r = 0.98; P < 0.001) for C. glabrum, Ψ = 0.14 RWC – 14.3 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.03 RWC – 3.96 (r = 0.80; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.93 Ψ +1.32 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) for O. aciphylla, Ψ = 0.09 RWC – 10.2 (r = 0.95; P < 0.01), Ψπ = 0.02 RWC – 2.75 (r = 0.83; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.79 Ψ +1.16 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) for E. leucantha and Ψ = 0.05 RWC – 4.84 (r = 0.94; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.02 RWC – 2.66 (r = 0.82; P < 0.001) and Ψp = 0.61 Ψ +0.76 (r = 0.96; P < 0.001) for M. sprucei.

Figure 1

Table 1. Leaf water content based on surface area (Wa), fresh weight (Wf) and dry mass (Wd), midday leaf water potential (Ψ) during rainy (RY) and rainless (RL) days, as well as the following pressure-volume parameters: osmotic potential at full (Ψ) and zero turgor (Ψ), relative water content at zero turgor (RWCo), apoplastic water content (A) and elastic modulus (ɛ). All measurements were taken in Caryocar glabrum and Ocotea aciphylla from the mixed forest and Eperua leucantha and Micranda sprucei from the Amazon caatinga. Each value is the mean ± SE of measurements taken from three trees per species. For each parameter, the mean followed by a letter represent statistical differences at P < 0.05.