Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:05:30.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prescribed daily-dose–based metrics of oral antibiotic use for hospitalized children in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2023

Wataru Mimura,
Daisuke ShinjoOpen the ORCID record for Daisuke Shinjo[Opens in a new window],
Kensuke Shoji and
Kiyohide FushimiOpen the ORCID record for Kiyohide Fushimi[Opens in a new window]
Wataru Mimura
Affiliation:
Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
Daisuke Shinjo*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
Kensuke Shoji
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
Kiyohide Fushimi
Affiliation:
Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Daisuke Shinjo, PhD, MMA, Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1138519, Japan. E-mail: dshinjo.hci@tmd.ac.jp

Abstract

Objective:

Defined daily-dose (DDD)–based metrics are frequently used to measure antibiotic consumption. However, they are unsuitable for the pediatric population because they are defined using the maintenance dose for 70-kg adults. Moreover, children have large body weight variations. We assessed the prescribed daily dose (PDD) and PDD-based metrics of oral antibiotics for children to develop an alternative to DDD-based metrics in Japan.

Design:

We performed observational study using data from the Japanese administrative claims database between April 2018 and March 2019.

Methods:

Of 453,001 patients (aged 1 month–15 years), 564,326 admissions to 1,159 hospitals were included. We showed the median PDD (mg/day and mg/kg/day) and PDD-based metrics for 8 antibiotics for each age category (1 month to <1 year old and 1–6, 7–12, and 13–15 years old). We also assessed the relationship between PDD-based metrics and days of therapy (DOT)–based metrics using a scatter plot and correlation.

Results:

In total, 86,389 patients (19.1%) were prescribed oral antibiotics; amoxicillin, macrolides, and third-generation cephalosporins were the most common. The PDD (mg/day) for each antibiotic increased with age to 7–12 years old, when an adult dose was reached. The PDD (mg/kg/day) decreased with age to 13–15 years old, due to increasing body weight. The relationship between PDD per 1,000 patient days and DOT per 1,000 patient days differed depending on the antibiotic.

Conclusions:

PDD-based metrics stratified by age could characterize antibiotic consumption, even with body-weight variations. Therefore, PDD-based metrics, in addition to DOT-based metrics, are helpful benchmarks for antibiotic use in children.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , 2023, e24
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

A defined daily dose (DDD) has been commonly used in previous studies to quantify antibiotic consumption. Reference Natsch, Hekster, de Jong, Heerdink, Herings and van der Meer1–Reference Stanic Benic, Milanic and Monnier4 DDDs are described by the World Health Organization as the maintenance dose per day for its main indication in 70 kg-adults. 5 DDD-based metrics allowed us to compare the use of antibiotics by standardization, even in different countries, areas, or hospitals. However, applying DDDs to the child population is unsuitable due to variations in body weight. Instead, days of therapy (DOT), defined as the total number of days that patients were administered antibiotics regardless of the dose, has been used. Reference Gerber, Newland and Coffin6–Reference Singh, Steurer, Cantey and Wattier8 Using the DOT metric has advantages and disadvantages; while it is unaffected by the changes and inconsistencies of DDDs, it cannot account for dose variations. Reference Polk, Fox, Mahoney, Letcavage and MacDougall9,Reference Gravatt and Pakyz10

DOT is the primary benchmark for monitoring the use of antibiotics and assessing antibiotic resistance in children. However, there are alternative metrics to quantify the dose of antibiotics, such as neonate DDDs, recommended daily doses per 100 kg days, and the prescribed daily dose (PDD). Reference Fortin, Fontela, Manges, Platt, Buckeridge and Quach2,Reference Liem, Heerdink, Egberts and Rademaker11–Reference Gagliotti, Ricchizzi, Buttazzi, Tumietto, Resi and Moro16 The PDD is based on data that reflect the prescribed dose. To deal with body weight variations, some studies have utilized PDDs as PDD (mg/kg/day) or have combined PDD (mg/day) with body weight stratification. Reference Amadeo, Zarb and Muller17–Reference Sánchez-Huesca, Lerma, Guzmán-Saldaña and Lerma20 PDDs are flexible and helpful metrics, even with weight variations similar to those in the child population. However, this metric must be developed in each country because of differences in indications or recommendations.

Several studies regarding the consumption of antibiotics have been conducted in the pediatric field since the antimicrobial resistance action plan was adopted in 2016. 21–Reference Okubo, Uda and Kinoshita27 These studies are important for comparing differences between area or hospitalization and evaluating associations between consumption and antimicrobial resistance. Most studies have used DOT-based metrics to assess antibiotics; however, data regarding additional metrics that should be used within the child population are insufficient in Japan. Therefore, to develop a PDD methodology in Japan, we examined PDDs and assessed the relationship between PDD- and DOT-based metrics using a national administrative claims database.

Methods

Study design and setting

In this observational study, we used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) data from April 2018 to March 2019. The DPC is a case-mix patient classification system that was adopted by ∼1,700 hospitals by 2018. Reference Matsuda, Fujimori and Fushimi28–Reference Hayashida, Murakami, Matsuda and Fushimi30 The data consist of discharge abstracts; administrative claims data from acute-care hospitals and patient background information including age, sex, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes, procedures, and medications. The study included patients aged <16 years at admission. Neonates aged 28 days and younger were excluded because we focused on the assessment of oral antibiotics. We excluded admissions with body-weight outliers due to data-entry errors by using a mean ±3 standard deviation (SD) cutoff for every 1 year of age. To adjust for a large body-weight distribution, we categorized patient admissions into 4 age groups: 1 month to <1 year, 1–6 years, 7–12 years, and 13–15 years. We included all hospitalized patients throughout the year; thus, some patients were classified into 2 groups.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tokyo Medical and Dental University. In addition, we used anonymized data for the studies; thus, the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Variable definition

Age and body weight were recorded at admission. Ages were summarized as days in the 1 month to <1 year group and as years in the remaining 3 age groups. We used the medical diagnostic categories (MDCs) to indicate the inpatient diagnoses. Reference Hayashida, Murakami, Matsuda and Fushimi30 The MDC system comprises 18 categories corresponding to a single organ system or etiology. Patients are assigned a 14-digit code related to the diagnosis of the most-used medical resources.

In Japan, the ratio of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in the tablet form of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (Augmentin) is 2:1, which is different from the international standard ratio of 7:1. Therefore, clinicians occasionally prescribe amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid simultaneously to adjust the ratio. We classified the medication as amoxicillin-clavulanic acid when amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were administered on the same day. The PDD of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was shown as an amoxicillin dose, and sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were shown as trimethoprim doses.

Statistical analysis

We assessed patient age (days or years), sex, body weight, length of stay (LOS), and MDC in each age category. Continuous variables are shown as the median and interquartile range (IQR) or mean and SD, as appropriate. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. We assessed the PDD metrics in 3 steps based on a previous study. Reference Porta, Hsia and Doerholt18 First, we summarized the proportion of each antibiotic among patients who were prescribed oral antibiotics. We did not assess parenteral antibiotics because the data would reflect the dose for payment rather than the administered dose based on body weight. Second, we calculated median PDDs (mg/day and mg/kg/day) and interquartile ranges for frequently prescribed antibiotics, to deal with outliers. Third, we standardized the antibiotic use in each hospital using the median PDDs (mg/day and mg/kg/day) stratified by age group, as follows: (1) PDD per 1,000 patient days based on the median PDD (mg/day) and (2) PDD per 1,000 patient days based on the median PDD (mg/kg/day). In the latter metric, PDD per 1,000 patient days standardized using PDD (mg/day) was calculated as the median PDD (mg/kg/day) × body weight (kg); thus, both metrics of PDD per 1,000 patient days were unified to compare them with each other. In addition, we showed the differences between the 2 metrics, since PDD per 1,000 patient days by median PDD (mg/day) may not reflect the dosing variation associated with body weight, compared with PDD per 1,000 patient days by median PDD (mg/kg/day). Fourth, we compared hospital-level metrics, estimated as PDD per 1,000 patient days by median PDD (mg/kg/day) and DOT per 1,000 patient days, from hospitals that showed >30 days of therapy for each antibiotic. In addition, we confirmed the relationship between the PDD- and DOT-based methods using a scatter plot and Spearman correlation coefficients. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

In this study, we evaluated several antibiotics that were highly ranked according to the first step. We excluded the data of doses >10 times the median PDD for each antibiotic when calculating the PDD per 1,000 patient days based on the median PDD (mg/kg/day) and DOT per 1,000 patient days. All analyses were performed using R version 4.0.5 software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Among 465,407 patients and 579,417 admissions between April 2018 and March 2019, we included 453,001 patients and 564,326 admissions. In total, 12,406 patients (2.7%) and 1,5091admissions (2.6%) were excluded by the body weight outlier or mission data. Table 1 shows the characteristics of admitted patients in each age group, and the mean age and mean weight were 5 years (SD, 4) and 19 kg (SD, 14), respectively. The most common MDCs in the 1 month to <1 year group and the 1–6 years group were MDC04 (diseases and disorders of the respiratory system, mainly lower respiratory infections, influenza, and pneumonia; 40%) and MDC04 (diseases and disorders of the respiratory system, such as respiratory infections and asthma; 28%), respectively. In the 7–12 and 13–15 years old groups, the common diseases were MDC06 (diseases and disorders of the digestive system, hepatobiliary system, and pancreas, especially appendicitis, viral, and other specified intestinal infections, and inguinal hernia; 16%) and MDC16 (trauma, burns, and poisoning, including any type of fracture and injury; 22%), respectively. For the 86,389 patients (19.1%) that were prescribed oral antibiotics, the commonly prescribed oral antibiotics ranked as follows: amoxicillin (21.8%), clarithromycin (16.8%), cefditoren (12.7%), cefcapene (10.2%), cefaclor (9.4%), cefdinir (6.9%), sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim (6.7%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (4.7%), and azithromycin (4.4%) (Supplementary Table 1). We assessed the PDD for the following 8 antibiotics: amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefalexin, cefaclor, cefditoren, clarithromycin, tosufloxacin, and sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim. The median PDDs (mg/day) were increased in the 1 month to <1 year group and the 7–12 years group, and it did not increase in the 7–12 years group or the 13–15 years group for all antibiotics (Table 2). Regarding PDDs (mg/kg/day), there were no significant differences between the 1 month to <1 year group and the 1–6 years group; however, they were gradually decreased in the 7–12 years group. After the use of antibiotic was standardized using the median PDD (mg/day) and median PDD (mg/kg/day), no differences were observed between PDD per 1,000 patient days based on the median PDD (mg/day) and PDD per 1,000 patient days based on the median PDD (mg/kg/day) (Table 3). The correlation coefficients were high for most antibiotics; however, the relationship between PDD per 1,000 patient days based on the median PDD (mg/kg/day) and DOT per 1,000 patient days differed between antibiotics (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Material).

Table 1.

Admission Characteristics for Pediatric Patients in Each Age Category

Note. IQR, interquartile range; LOS, length of stay; MDC, major diagnosis category; SD, standard deviation.

a The age presented as days in 1 month to <1 year, others presented as years.

Table 2.

Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD, mg/day and mg/kg/day) in 4 Age Groups

Note. IQR, interquartile range.

a Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid presented as the amoxicillin dose.

b Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim presented as the trimethoprim dose.

Table 3.

Comparison of Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD) per 1,000 Patient Days Based on Median PDD (mg/day and mg/kg/day)

a The groups included >30 days of therapy per age group.

Fig. 1.

The relationship between DOT per 1,000 patient days and PDD per 1,000 patient days per hospital for amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. The solid line represents a slope of 1; the upper dot line represents slope of 2, and the upper dot line represents slope of 0.5. PDD per 1,000 patient days based on the median PDD (mg/kg/day).

Discussion

In this study, we developed a PDD-based methodology to assess the use of antibiotics in children. We showed median PDDs (mg/day and mg/kg/day) and the relationship between DOT per 1,000 patient days and PDD per 1,000 patient days for pediatric patients using the nationwide inpatient database in Japan. In addition, we characterized the relationship between PDD (mg/day) and DOT metrics and used scatter plots to describe the variation between the hospitals. We found that PDD (mg/day) metrics-stratified age groups could be an alternative to DDD-based metrics in the pediatric population.

Our results for oral antibiotic prescriptions for pediatric inpatients showed a similar tendency to that of pediatric outpatients in Japan. Reference Yamasaki, Tanabe, Muraki, Kato, Ohmagari and Yagi22–Reference Uda, Okubo, Kinoshita, Morisaki, Kasai, Horikoshi and Miyairi24 These studies also reported that penicillin with an extended-spectrum (anatomical therapeutic chemical code: J01CA), third-generation cephalosporins (J01DD), and macrolides (J01FA) were commonly prescribed for several years. In addition to the prevalence of antibiotics, we calculated PDDs for each antibiotic. The median PDD (mg/day) increased gradually with increasing age, reaching a plateau at 7–12 years for each antibiotic. In contrast, PDDs (mg/kg/day) decreased for each antibiotic because the patients were more likely to reach an adult body weight; thus, the median PDDs (mg/day) gradually decreased with increasing age.

For amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, the PDDs showed a significant difference in the amoxicillin dose (Table 2). The PDDs of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were more than double that of the PDDs of amoxicillin in all groups. These doses coincide with the Japanese guidelines for respiratory disease and labeled doses in Japan, and these variations may reflect the indications for each antibiotic. Reference Mikasa, Aoki and Aoki31 In our study, we indicated the PDDs as an amoxicillin dose instead of as a unit dose because the ratios of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid differed depending on the product used Reference Huttner, Bielicki, Clements, Frimodt-Møller, Muller, Paccaud and Mouton32 ; some are at a ratio of 2:1 and others are 14:1. In addition, clinicians occasionally prescribe amoxicillin-clavulanic acid products with amoxicillin products to adjust the ratio. Porta et al Reference Porta, Hsia and Doerholt18 reported that the PDDs (mg/kg/day) of amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid varied widely between centers, even though it was commonly prescribed in each hospital. These variations are explained mainly by differences in the disease or indications, which characterize the use of antibiotics.

The relationship between PDD per 1,000 patient days and DOT per 1,000 patient days varied with the antibiotics. For example, for tosufloxacin, the 2 metrics were almost identical (Supplementary Fig. 1). The study also reported a similar tendency for the difference between DDD per 1,000 patient days and DOT per 1,000 patient days for levofloxacin. Reference Polk, Fox, Mahoney, Letcavage and MacDougall9 In contrast, clarithromycin and sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were widely distributed. The results were associated with the wide range of doses. Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim are used to prevent urinary tract infections in children with vesicoureteral reflux or Pneumocystis pneumonia in children with immune suppression. Reference Wang, Gbadegesin, Foreman, Nagaraj, Wigfall, Wiener and Routh33,Reference Stern, Green, Paul, Vidal and Leibovici34 Macrolides also have low-dose treatment options for chronic airway diseases. Reference Sun and Long-term35 Thus, PDD-based metrics are more likely to be beneficial than DOT-based metrics for assessing the consumption of antibiotics when the range of doses is wide due to indications. The results imply that the PDD and DOT methodologies have different characteristics as metrics, and combining the 2 metrics was beneficial to audit child antibiotic use.

We used the median PDDs (mg/day) with stratification by age instead of the median PDDs (mg/kg/day) with body weight to adjust the dosing variation due to body weight. The stratification by age were valuable to control variations because the differences between the 2 metrics of PDD per 1,000 patient days may not be significant. Using the median PDDs (mg/day) in the stratified cohort is acceptable, given that DDDs are defined by the dose in 70-kg adults. Furthermore, there is a benefit to using the PDDs (mg/day) stratified by age because there are limitations to obtaining information on patient body weight in Japan. The Japanese claims database, which is mainly used to evaluate oral antibiotics in an outpatient setting, does not generally contain body-weight data, but it includes age. Thus, using PDD (mg/day) after stratifying by age would be one of the most practical approaches to assess the consumption of antibiotics rather than PDD (mg/kg/day).

The Manual of Antimicrobial Stewardship and changes in the reimbursement system regarding the regulation of antimicrobial stewardship fees after the national action plan for antimicrobial resistance were adopted in Japan. 21,36 Studies have reported that after the new antimicrobial stewardship fee was implemented, the frequency of antibiotic prescriptions decreased. Reference Muraki, Kusama and Tanabe37–Reference Kimura, Fukuda and Hayakawa39 These changes were made to promote appropriate antimicrobial therapy and affect decision making regarding the necessity of treatment, antibiotic selection, treatment period, and dose. Monitoring PDDs and the use of PDD benchmarking allows us to assess the effects in detail.

This study has notable strengths. It is the largest reported study on this subject based on a national administrative database. In addition, we have developed metrics for the use of antibiotics in Japanese pediatric settings, and we have assessed hospital variations for PDD- and DOT-based metrics. Our results indicate that the use of PDD- and DOT-based metrics, instead of DDD-based metrics, is helpful in pediatric settings and informs future interventions to improve the use of antibiotics in children. The metrics can also be used for benchmarking hospitals and further longitudinal analyses based on the database. Moreover, DDD-based metrics are not suitable for patients with renal dysfunction and children. Reference Polk, Fox, Mahoney, Letcavage and MacDougall9 Therefore, the potential application of PDD-based metrics should be examined by utilizing more detailed data, such as electronic health records, in further studies including patients and populations that reported large deviations between PDD and DDD. Reference Nunes19

This study had several limitations. First, these metrics cannot be applied to children in other countries because the PDDs indicate the dose prescribed for pediatric patients in Japan. In addition, our findings may not be generalizable to other populations, although we used the nationwide database in Japan. We could not assess the validity in outpatients due to the use of inpatient data. Second, we excluded admissions with an outlier or missing values of body weight due to data-entry errors. However, median PDD (mg/day) and PDD (mg/kg/day) values could be reasonable under the approved dosage and indications for infectious disease in Japan. Third, we could not show the PDD for parenteral antibiotics because the data more likely reflected the dose for payments and not the dose received by patients. Thus, these data were not suitable for PDD, and we alternative methods or data are needed to assess the dose of parenteral antibiotics in addition to DOT metrics in pediatric patients.

In conclusion, we assessed PDD (mg/day and mg/kg/day) and oral antibiotic metrics among children admitted to hospitals in Japan. The PDDs (mg/day) and PDDs (mg/kg/day) changed gradually, increasing with age. In addition, the relationship between the PDD per 1,000 patient days and DOT per 1,000 patient days was antibiotic dependent. Therefore, PDD could be useful for auditing intra- and interhospital changes and differences in antibiotic usage in Japan.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.2.

Acknowledgments

Financial support

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (grant no. 22AA2003 to K.F.) and a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant no. JSPS KAKENHI, 20H03921 to D.S.).

Conflicts of interest

K.S. has received lecture fees from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Astellas, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Gilead, BioMérieux Japan Ltd, and Abbie GK. All other authors have no conflicts to declare.

References

Natsch, S, Hekster, YA, de Jong, R, Heerdink, ER, Herings, RM, van der Meer, JW. Application of the ATC/DDD methodology to monitor antibiotic drug use. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1998;17:20–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortin, E, Fontela, PS, Manges, AR, Platt, RW, Buckeridge, DL, Quach, C. Measuring antimicrobial use in hospitalized patients: a systematic review of available measures applicable to paediatrics. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:1447–1456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanichelli, V, Monnier, AA, Gyssens, IC, et al. Variation in antibiotic use among and within different settings: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:vi17–vi29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanic Benic, M, Milanic, R, Monnier, AA, et al. Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:vi50–vi58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment, 2022. Oslo, Norway, 2021. World Health Organization website. https://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/2022_guidelines_web.pdf. Published 2021. Accessed January 25, 2022.Google Scholar
Gerber, JS, Newland, JG, Coffin, SE, et al. Variability in antibiotic use at children’s hospitals. Pediatrics 2010;126:1067–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Leary, EN, van Santen, KL, Edwards, EM, et al. Using NHSN’s antimicrobial use option to monitor and improve antibiotic stewardship in neonates. Hosp Pediatr 2019;9:340–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, P, Steurer, MA, Cantey, JB, Wattier, RL. Hospital-level antibiotic use and complexity of care among neonates. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2020;9:656–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polk, RE, Fox, C, Mahoney, A, Letcavage, J, MacDougall, C. Measurement of adult antibacterial drug use in 130 US hospitals: comparison of defined daily dose and days of therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:664–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gravatt, LAH, Pakyz, AL. Challenges in measuring antibiotic consumption. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2013;15:559–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liem, TBY, Heerdink, ER, Egberts, ACG, Rademaker, CMA. Quantifying antibiotic use in paediatrics: a proposal for neonatal DDDs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;29:1301–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merlo, J, Wessling, A, Melander, A. Comparison of dose standard units for drug utilisation studies. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1996;50:27–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, A, Monnet, DL, Talon, D, Hénon, T, Bertrand, X. Discrepancies between prescribed daily doses and WHO defined daily doses of antibacterials at a university hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006;61:585–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de With, K, Bestehorn, H, Steib-Bauert, M, Kern, WV. Comparison of defined versus recommended versus prescribed daily doses for measuring hospital antibiotic consumption. Infection 2009;37:349–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raastad, R, Tvete, IF, Abrahamsen, TG, Berild, D, Leegaard, TM, Walberg, M, Müller, F. A worrying trend in weight-adjusted paediatric antibiotic use in a Norwegian tertiary-care hospital. Acta Paediatr 2015;104:687–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliotti, C, Ricchizzi, E, Buttazzi, R, Tumietto, F, Resi, D, Moro, ML. Hospital statistics for antibiotics: defined versus prescribed daily dose. Infection 2014;42:869–873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amadeo, B, Zarb, P, Muller, A, et al. European Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption (ESAC) point prevalence survey 2008: paediatric antimicrobial prescribing in 32 hospitals of 21 European countries. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:2247–2252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porta, A, Hsia, Y, Doerholt, K, et al. Comparing neonatal and paediatric antibiotic prescribing between hospitals: a new algorithm to help international benchmarking. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:1278–1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunes, PHC, Moreira JP de L, Thompson A de F, Machado TL da S, Cerbino-Neto J, Bozza FA. Antibiotic consumption and deviation of prescribed daily dose from the defined daily dose in critical care patients: a point-prevalence study. Front Pharmacol 2022;13:913568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Huesca, R, Lerma, A, Guzmán-Saldaña, RME, Lerma, C. Prevalence of antibiotics prescription and assessment of prescribed daily dose in outpatients from Mexico City. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020;9:38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National action plan on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The Government of Japan website. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10900000-Kenkoukyoku/0000138942.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed January 25, 2022.Google Scholar
Yamasaki, D, Tanabe, M, Muraki, Y, Kato, G, Ohmagari, N, Yagi, T. The first report of Japanese antimicrobial use measured by national database based on health insurance claims data (2011–2013): comparison with sales data, and trend analysis stratified by antimicrobial category and age group. Infection 2018;46:207–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinoshita, N, Morisaki, N, Uda, K, Kasai, M, Horikoshi, Y, Miyairi, I. Nationwide study of outpatient oral antimicrobial utilization patterns for children in Japan (2013–2016). J Infect Chemother 2019;25:22–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uda, K, Okubo, Y, Kinoshita, N, Morisaki, N, Kasai, M, Horikoshi, Y, Miyairi, I. Nationwide survey of indications for oral antimicrobial prescription for pediatric patients from 2013 to 2016 in Japan. J Infect Chemother 2019;25:758–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uda, K, Kinoshita, N, Morisaki, N, Kasai, M, Horikoshi, Y, Miyairi, I. Targets for optimizing oral antibiotic prescriptions for pediatric outpatients in Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis 2019;72:149–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyairi, I, Shoji, K, Kinoshita, N, et al. Prospective monitoring of carbapenem use and pseudomonal resistance across pediatric institutions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:1042–1047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okubo, Y, Uda, K, Kinoshita, N, et al. National trends in appropriate antibiotics use among pediatric inpatients with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections in Japan. J Infect Chemother 2020;26:1122–1128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsuda, S, Fujimori, K, Fushimi, K. Development of case mix based evaluation system in Japan. Asian Pac J Dis Manag 2013;4:55–66.Google Scholar
Yasunaga, H. Real-world data in Japan: Chapter II, the diagnosis procedure combination database. Ann Epidemiol 2019;1:76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashida, K, Murakami, G, Matsuda, S, Fushimi, K. History and profile of diagnosis procedure combination (DPC): development of a real data collection system for acute inpatient care in Japan. J Epidemiol 2021;31:1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikasa, K, Aoki, N, Aoki, Y, et al. JAID/JSC Guidelines for the treatment of respiratory infectious diseases: the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases/Japanese Society of Chemotherapy—The JAID/JSC guide to clinical management of infectious disease/guideline-preparing committee respiratory infectious disease WG. J Infect Chemother 2016;22:S1–S65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttner, A, Bielicki, J, Clements, MN, Frimodt-Møller, N, Muller, AE, Paccaud, J-P, Mouton, JW. Oral amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid: properties, indications and usage. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:871–879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, HHS, Gbadegesin, RA, Foreman, JW, Nagaraj, SK, Wigfall, DR, Wiener, JS, Routh, JC. Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in children with vesicoureteral reflux: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2015;193:963–969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, A, Green, H, Paul, M, Vidal, L, Leibovici, L. Prophylaxis for pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in non-HIV immunocompromised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014:CD005590.Google ScholarPubMed
Sun, J, Long-term, Li Y., low-dose macrolide antibiotic treatment in pediatric chronic airway diseases. Pediatr Res 2022;91:1036–1042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Government of Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Health Service Bureau Tuberculosis and Infectious Diseases Control Division. Manual of Antimicrobial Stewardship (1st Edition). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10900000-Kenkoukyoku/0000193504.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed January, 25 2022.Google Scholar
Muraki, Y, Kusama, Y, Tanabe, M, et al. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship fee on prescribing for Japanese pediatric patients with upper respiratory infections. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, D, Goto, T, Uda, K, Kumazawa, R, Matsui, H, Yasunaga, H. Impact of national guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship to reduce antibiotic use in upper respiratory tract infection and gastroenteritis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:280–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Y, Fukuda, H, Hayakawa, K, et al. Longitudinal trends of and factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for nonbacterial acute respiratory tract infection in Japan: a retrospective claims database study, 2012–2017. PLoS One 2019;14:e0223835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1.Admission Characteristics for Pediatric Patients in Each Age Category

Figure 1

Table 2.Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD, mg/day and mg/kg/day) in 4 Age Groups

Figure 2

Table 3.Comparison of Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD) per 1,000 Patient Days Based on Median PDD (mg/day and mg/kg/day)

Figure 3

Fig. 1.The relationship between DOT per 1,000 patient days and PDD per 1,000 patient days per hospital for amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. The solid line represents a slope of 1; the upper dot line represents slope of 2, and the upper dot line represents slope of 0.5. PDD per 1,000 patient days based on the median PDD (mg/kg/day).

Supplementary material: File

Mimura et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figure S1 Legend

Download Mimura et al. supplementary material(File)
File 67.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Mimura et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Mimura et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 16.7 MB