Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:27:36.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the potential use of glacier and permafrost observations forverification of climate models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Martin Beniston
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), CH-8017 Zürich, Switzerland
Wilfried Haeberli
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
Martin Hoelzle
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), CH-8017 Zürich, SwitzerlandLaboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology, ETH-Zürich, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Alan Taylor
Affiliation:
Global Change Working Group, International Permafrost Association, Sidney, British Columbia VBL 3L5, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While the capability of global and regional climate models in reproducingcurrent climate has significantly improved over the past few years, theconfidence in model results for remote regions, or those where complexorography is a dominant feature, is still relatively low. This is, in part,linked to the lack of observational data for model verification andintercomparison purposes.

Glacier and permafrost observations are directly related to past and presentenergy flux patterns at the Earth-atmosphere interface and could be used asa proxy for air temperature and precipitation, particularly of value inremote mountain regions and boreal and Arctic zones where instrumentalclimate records are sparse or non-existent. It is particularly important toverify climate-model performance in these regions, as this is where mostgeneral circulation models (GCMs) predict the greatest changes in airtemperatures in a warmer global climate.

Existing datasets from glacier and permafrost monitoring sites in remote andhigh altitudes are described in this paper; the data could be used inmodel-verification studies, as a means to improving model performance inthese regions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1997
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Changes in annual mean global temperatures between current climate and 2 × CO2 climate as simulated by the ECHAM GCM of the Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Upper: LAM-simulated temperature changes in January (left) and July (right), between current and 2 × CO2 climate in °K; Lower: as for upper, except for precipitation changes in mm d1.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Mean glacier elevation in the European Alps as based on glacier inventories compiled for Austria (1969), France (1967–71), Germany (1979), Italy (1975–84) and Switzerland (1973).

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Mean net balance (upper) and cumulative-mean net balance (lower) continuously measured for the period 1980–93 on 33 glaciers in 11 mountain unices (from Haeberli and others, 1994).

Figure 4

Table 1.Circumpolar active layer monitoring (CALM) Program. Note: abstracts and posters reporting these results were presented and published in April 1996 at the ITEX workshop in Copenhagen and the geocryology conference in Pushchino. Additional mountain site and those measuring soild temperatures are being identified and will be added to the network and reported with 1996 observations (Brown, 1996, 1997)

Figure 5

Fig. 5.Temperature evolution at 2.5 m depth (active layer) and at 11.5m Within the permafrost borehole Murtèl/Corvatsch (eastern Swiss Alps). Active-layer temperatures help with understanding energy-exchange processes at the surface and can be used for calibrating statistical relations between ground temperatures and meteorological parameters (such as air temperature and precipitation). Heat-conduction effects filter out high-frequency irregularities at the surface and show longer-term trends with extreme clarity. Snow-poor winters in 1988–89, 1994–95 and 1995–90 with intense ground cooling interrupt the general-warming trend since the late 1980s.